Los nacionalismos y las canteras del tercerismo. Entre el hispanismo y el orientalismo en los sesenta
In these reflections on nationalism as an alternative option, which aims to overcome the division of the field between right and left, we advance in two ways. We first went through the moments of nationalism in national history, attending to the double drive, which invests it in a bivalent sense: a...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN FR PT |
| Publicado: |
Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dab8b1b45be54445be9570dca5b954a4 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | In these reflections on nationalism as an alternative option, which aims to overcome the division of the field between right and left, we advance in two ways. We first went through the moments of nationalism in national history, attending to the double drive, which invests it in a bivalent sense: a defensive and emancipationist and another offensive and coercive of freedoms, which bring it closer to one or another margin of the ideological political spectrum. Then, we refer to the treatment of the subject in the second half of the Argentine twentieth century, and particularly, to our inquiries about the Mendoza locus, referring to the third-party quarries in which they water sectors of Catholic nationalism in the sixties, in the explanatory framework of conflicting international and national contexts. While a part of these sectors strengthened ties with the Franco regime and recovered the different meanings of Hispanicism, with its reactionary, conservative and modernizing facets. Others looked with sympathy on the eastern nationalist and emancipation movements, approaching the revolutionary and anti-imperialist imaginary of the emerging new left. |
|---|