Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures

Abstract Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langqing Zeng, Lulu Zeng, Xiaogang Miao, Yunfeng Chen, Weiguo Liang, Yuwen Jiang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dacf8159937f4fc283cb3718029cd00d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dacf8159937f4fc283cb3718029cd00d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dacf8159937f4fc283cb3718029cd00d2021-12-02T11:50:40ZSingle versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures10.1038/s41598-021-81242-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/dacf8159937f4fc283cb3718029cd00d2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81242-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.Langqing ZengLulu ZengXiaogang MiaoYunfeng ChenWeiguo LiangYuwen JiangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Langqing Zeng
Lulu Zeng
Xiaogang Miao
Yunfeng Chen
Weiguo Liang
Yuwen Jiang
Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
description Abstract Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.
format article
author Langqing Zeng
Lulu Zeng
Xiaogang Miao
Yunfeng Chen
Weiguo Liang
Yuwen Jiang
author_facet Langqing Zeng
Lulu Zeng
Xiaogang Miao
Yunfeng Chen
Weiguo Liang
Yuwen Jiang
author_sort Langqing Zeng
title Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_short Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_full Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_fullStr Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_sort single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dacf8159937f4fc283cb3718029cd00d
work_keys_str_mv AT langqingzeng singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT luluzeng singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT xiaogangmiao singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT yunfengchen singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT weiguoliang singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT yuwenjiang singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
_version_ 1718395194787758080