Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool

JiSheng Lin,* Yong Yang,* Qi Fei, XiaoDong Zhang, Zhao Ma, Qi Wang, JinJun Li, Dong Li, Qian Meng, BingQiang Wang Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Objec...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin JS, Yang Y, Fei Q, Zhang XD, Ma Z, Wang Q, Li JJ, Li D, Meng Q, Wang BQ
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dae9b3bf3943400e9728752f46f7a13f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dae9b3bf3943400e9728752f46f7a13f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dae9b3bf3943400e9728752f46f7a13f2021-12-02T07:56:42ZValidation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/dae9b3bf3943400e9728752f46f7a13f2016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/validation-of-three-tools-for-identifying-painful-new-osteoporotic-ver-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998JiSheng Lin,* Yong Yang,* Qi Fei, XiaoDong Zhang, Zhao Ma, Qi Wang, JinJun Li, Dong Li, Qian Meng, BingQiang Wang Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Objective: This cross-sectional study compared three tools for predicting painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures (PNOVFs) in older Chinese men: bone mineral density (BMD), the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), and the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) (without BMD). Methods: Men aged ≥50 years were apportioned to a group for men with fractures who had undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty (n=111), or a control group of healthy men (n=385). Fractures were verified on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. BMD T-scores were determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Diagnosis of osteoporosis was determined by a BMD T-score of ≤2.5 standard deviations below the average for a young adult at peak bone density at the femoral neck, total hip, or L1–L4. Demographic and clinical risk factor data were self-reported through a questionnaire. BMD, OSTA, and FRAX scores were assessed for identifying PNOVFs via receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Optimal cutoff points, sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were determined. Results: Between the men with fractures and the control group, there were significant differences in BMD T-scores (at femoral neck, total hip, and L1–L4), and OSTA and FRAX scores. In those with fractures, only 53.15% satisfied the criteria for osteoporosis. Compared to BMD or OSTA, the FRAX score had the best predictive value for PNOVFs: the AUC of the FRAX score (cutoff =2.9%) was 0.738, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion: FRAX may be a valuable tool for identifying PNOVFs in older Chinese men. Keywords: osteoporosis, male, vertebral fracture, FRAX, OSTA, bone mineral density Lin JSYang YFei QZhang XDMa ZWang QLi JJLi DMeng QWang BQDove Medical PressarticleOsteoporosismalevertebral fractureFRAXOSTAbone mineral densityGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 11, Pp 461-469 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Osteoporosis
male
vertebral fracture
FRAX
OSTA
bone mineral density
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle Osteoporosis
male
vertebral fracture
FRAX
OSTA
bone mineral density
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Lin JS
Yang Y
Fei Q
Zhang XD
Ma Z
Wang Q
Li JJ
Li D
Meng Q
Wang BQ
Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
description JiSheng Lin,* Yong Yang,* Qi Fei, XiaoDong Zhang, Zhao Ma, Qi Wang, JinJun Li, Dong Li, Qian Meng, BingQiang Wang Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Objective: This cross-sectional study compared three tools for predicting painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures (PNOVFs) in older Chinese men: bone mineral density (BMD), the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), and the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) (without BMD). Methods: Men aged ≥50 years were apportioned to a group for men with fractures who had undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty (n=111), or a control group of healthy men (n=385). Fractures were verified on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. BMD T-scores were determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Diagnosis of osteoporosis was determined by a BMD T-score of ≤2.5 standard deviations below the average for a young adult at peak bone density at the femoral neck, total hip, or L1–L4. Demographic and clinical risk factor data were self-reported through a questionnaire. BMD, OSTA, and FRAX scores were assessed for identifying PNOVFs via receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Optimal cutoff points, sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were determined. Results: Between the men with fractures and the control group, there were significant differences in BMD T-scores (at femoral neck, total hip, and L1–L4), and OSTA and FRAX scores. In those with fractures, only 53.15% satisfied the criteria for osteoporosis. Compared to BMD or OSTA, the FRAX score had the best predictive value for PNOVFs: the AUC of the FRAX score (cutoff =2.9%) was 0.738, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion: FRAX may be a valuable tool for identifying PNOVFs in older Chinese men. Keywords: osteoporosis, male, vertebral fracture, FRAX, OSTA, bone mineral density 
format article
author Lin JS
Yang Y
Fei Q
Zhang XD
Ma Z
Wang Q
Li JJ
Li D
Meng Q
Wang BQ
author_facet Lin JS
Yang Y
Fei Q
Zhang XD
Ma Z
Wang Q
Li JJ
Li D
Meng Q
Wang BQ
author_sort Lin JS
title Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
title_short Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
title_full Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
title_fullStr Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
title_full_unstemmed Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
title_sort validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older chinese men: bone mineral density, osteoporosis self-assessment tool for asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/dae9b3bf3943400e9728752f46f7a13f
work_keys_str_mv AT linjs validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT yangy validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT feiq validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT zhangxd validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT maz validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT wangq validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT lijj validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT lid validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT mengq validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
AT wangbq validationofthreetoolsforidentifyingpainfulnewosteoporoticvertebralfracturesinolderchinesemenbonemineraldensityosteoporosisselfassessmenttoolforasiansandfractureriskassessmenttool
_version_ 1718399132456976384