Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation

Accurate stratification of sepsis can effectively guide the triage of patient care and shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). However, previous research on sepsis identification models focused mainly on ICU patients, and discrepancies in model performance between the development an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pei-Chen Lin, Kuo-Tai Chen, Huan-Chieh Chen, Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Ming-Chin Lin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/db4f7d1a0f004fad91523c388f3c115a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:db4f7d1a0f004fad91523c388f3c115a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:db4f7d1a0f004fad91523c388f3c115a2021-11-25T18:06:46ZMachine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation10.3390/jpm111110552075-4426https://doaj.org/article/db4f7d1a0f004fad91523c388f3c115a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/11/1055https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426Accurate stratification of sepsis can effectively guide the triage of patient care and shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). However, previous research on sepsis identification models focused mainly on ICU patients, and discrepancies in model performance between the development and external validation datasets are rarely evaluated. The aim of our study was to develop and externally validate a machine learning model to stratify sepsis patients in the ED. We retrospectively collected clinical data from two geographically separate institutes that provided a different level of care at different time periods. The Sepsis-3 criteria were used as the reference standard in both datasets for identifying true sepsis cases. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was developed to stratify sepsis patients and the performance of the model was compared with traditional clinical sepsis tools; quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). There were 8296 patients (1752 (21%) being septic) in the development and 1744 patients (506 (29%) being septic) in the external validation datasets. The mortality of septic patients in the development and validation datasets was 13.5% and 17%, respectively. In the internal validation, XGBoost achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86, exceeding SIRS (0.68) and qSOFA (0.56). The performance of XGBoost deteriorated in the external validation (the AUROC of XGBoost, SIRS and qSOFA was 0.75, 0.57 and 0.66, respectively). Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, such as sepsis prevalence, severity, age, comorbidity and infection focus, could reduce model performance. Our model showed good discriminative capabilities for the identification of sepsis patients and outperformed the existing sepsis identification tools. Implementation of the ML model in the ED can facilitate timely sepsis identification and treatment. However, dataset discrepancies should be carefully evaluated before implementing the ML approach in clinical practice. This finding reinforces the necessity for future studies to perform external validation to ensure the generalisability of any developed ML approaches.Pei-Chen LinKuo-Tai ChenHuan-Chieh ChenMd. Mohaimenul IslamMing-Chin LinMDPI AGarticlesepsisseptic shockmachine learningemergency departmentintensive care unitMedicineRENJournal of Personalized Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 1055, p 1055 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic sepsis
septic shock
machine learning
emergency department
intensive care unit
Medicine
R
spellingShingle sepsis
septic shock
machine learning
emergency department
intensive care unit
Medicine
R
Pei-Chen Lin
Kuo-Tai Chen
Huan-Chieh Chen
Md. Mohaimenul Islam
Ming-Chin Lin
Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
description Accurate stratification of sepsis can effectively guide the triage of patient care and shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). However, previous research on sepsis identification models focused mainly on ICU patients, and discrepancies in model performance between the development and external validation datasets are rarely evaluated. The aim of our study was to develop and externally validate a machine learning model to stratify sepsis patients in the ED. We retrospectively collected clinical data from two geographically separate institutes that provided a different level of care at different time periods. The Sepsis-3 criteria were used as the reference standard in both datasets for identifying true sepsis cases. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was developed to stratify sepsis patients and the performance of the model was compared with traditional clinical sepsis tools; quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). There were 8296 patients (1752 (21%) being septic) in the development and 1744 patients (506 (29%) being septic) in the external validation datasets. The mortality of septic patients in the development and validation datasets was 13.5% and 17%, respectively. In the internal validation, XGBoost achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86, exceeding SIRS (0.68) and qSOFA (0.56). The performance of XGBoost deteriorated in the external validation (the AUROC of XGBoost, SIRS and qSOFA was 0.75, 0.57 and 0.66, respectively). Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, such as sepsis prevalence, severity, age, comorbidity and infection focus, could reduce model performance. Our model showed good discriminative capabilities for the identification of sepsis patients and outperformed the existing sepsis identification tools. Implementation of the ML model in the ED can facilitate timely sepsis identification and treatment. However, dataset discrepancies should be carefully evaluated before implementing the ML approach in clinical practice. This finding reinforces the necessity for future studies to perform external validation to ensure the generalisability of any developed ML approaches.
format article
author Pei-Chen Lin
Kuo-Tai Chen
Huan-Chieh Chen
Md. Mohaimenul Islam
Ming-Chin Lin
author_facet Pei-Chen Lin
Kuo-Tai Chen
Huan-Chieh Chen
Md. Mohaimenul Islam
Ming-Chin Lin
author_sort Pei-Chen Lin
title Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
title_short Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
title_full Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
title_fullStr Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation
title_sort machine learning model to identify sepsis patients in the emergency department: algorithm development and validation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/db4f7d1a0f004fad91523c388f3c115a
work_keys_str_mv AT peichenlin machinelearningmodeltoidentifysepsispatientsintheemergencydepartmentalgorithmdevelopmentandvalidation
AT kuotaichen machinelearningmodeltoidentifysepsispatientsintheemergencydepartmentalgorithmdevelopmentandvalidation
AT huanchiehchen machinelearningmodeltoidentifysepsispatientsintheemergencydepartmentalgorithmdevelopmentandvalidation
AT mdmohaimenulislam machinelearningmodeltoidentifysepsispatientsintheemergencydepartmentalgorithmdevelopmentandvalidation
AT mingchinlin machinelearningmodeltoidentifysepsispatientsintheemergencydepartmentalgorithmdevelopmentandvalidation
_version_ 1718411649286668288