Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism

This special issue problematizes the often-uncritical use of images in publications and displays about communism. It poses a number of questions for anthropologists, historians, museologists and others: when does an image or a museum display present itself as problematic and for whom? Under what cir...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	David Crowley, James Kapalo, Gabriela Nicolescu
Format:	article
Langue:	EN FR
Publié:	National Museum of the Romanian Peasant 2021
Sujets:	ethical practice visual legacies material legacies communism post-communism Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674
Accès en ligne:	https://doaj.org/article/dba1fdd77c5c44fbb5a515ebbd76e39d
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:dba1fdd77c5c44fbb5a515ebbd76e39d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:dba1fdd77c5c44fbb5a515ebbd76e39d2021-11-22T13:23:07ZIntroduction. Visual Ethics after Communism2734-83501224-6271https://doaj.org/article/dba1fdd77c5c44fbb5a515ebbd76e39d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://martor.muzeultaranuluiroman.ro/archive/martor-26-2021/2021_01/https://doaj.org/toc/2734-8350https://doaj.org/toc/1224-6271This special issue problematizes the often-uncritical use of images in publications and displays about communism. It poses a number of questions for anthropologists, historians, museologists and others: when does an image or a museum display present itself as problematic and for whom? Under what circumstances is it ethically justifiable to exhibit or publish such images or, conversely, to put images aside, leaving them undisplayed? When do arguments based on “the public good” outweigh the right to personal privacy, individual integrity and cultural patrimony of source communities? David CrowleyJames KapaloGabriela NicolescuNational Museum of the Romanian Peasantarticleethical practicevisual legaciesmaterial legaciescommunismpost-communismEthnology. Social and cultural anthropologyGN301-674ENFRMartor, Vol 26, Pp 7-22 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	ethical practice visual legacies material legacies communism post-communism Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674
spellingShingle	ethical practice visual legacies material legacies communism post-communism Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674 David Crowley James Kapalo Gabriela Nicolescu Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
description	This special issue problematizes the often-uncritical use of images in publications and displays about communism. It poses a number of questions for anthropologists, historians, museologists and others: when does an image or a museum display present itself as problematic and for whom? Under what circumstances is it ethically justifiable to exhibit or publish such images or, conversely, to put images aside, leaving them undisplayed? When do arguments based on “the public good” outweigh the right to personal privacy, individual integrity and cultural patrimony of source communities?
format	article
author	David Crowley James Kapalo Gabriela Nicolescu
author_facet	David Crowley James Kapalo Gabriela Nicolescu
author_sort	David Crowley
title	Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
title_short	Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
title_full	Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
title_fullStr	Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
title_full_unstemmed	Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism
title_sort	introduction. visual ethics after communism
publisher	National Museum of the Romanian Peasant
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/dba1fdd77c5c44fbb5a515ebbd76e39d
work_keys_str_mv	AT davidcrowley introductionvisualethicsaftercommunism AT jameskapalo introductionvisualethicsaftercommunism AT gabrielanicolescu introductionvisualethicsaftercommunism
_version_	1718417583615508480

Introduction. Visual Ethics after Communism

Documents similaires