Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models

Abstract Background This paper compares a hybrid traffic flow model with benchmark macroscopic and microscopic models. The proposed hybrid traffic flow model may be applied considering a mixed traffic flow and is based on the combination of the macroscopic cell transmission model and the microscopic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Facundo Storani, Roberta Di Pace, Francesca Bruno, Chiara Fiori
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dba62aab1fd9400585a504b131e3b8fb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dba62aab1fd9400585a504b131e3b8fb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dba62aab1fd9400585a504b131e3b8fb2021-11-28T12:14:41ZAnalysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models10.1186/s12544-021-00515-01867-07171866-8887https://doaj.org/article/dba62aab1fd9400585a504b131e3b8fb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00515-0https://doaj.org/toc/1867-0717https://doaj.org/toc/1866-8887Abstract Background This paper compares a hybrid traffic flow model with benchmark macroscopic and microscopic models. The proposed hybrid traffic flow model may be applied considering a mixed traffic flow and is based on the combination of the macroscopic cell transmission model and the microscopic cellular automata. Modelled variables The hybrid model is compared against three microscopic models, namely the Krauß model, the intelligent driver model and the cellular automata, and against two macroscopic models, the Cell Transmission Model and the Cell Transmission Model with dispersion, respectively. To this end, three main applications were considered: (i) a link with a signalised junction at the end, (ii) a signalised artery, and (iii) a grid network with signalised junctions. Results The numerical simulations show that the model provides acceptable results. Especially in terms of travel times, it has similar behaviour to the microscopic model. By contrast, it produces lower values of queue propagation than microscopic models (intrinsically dominated by stochastic phenomena), which are closer to the values shown by the enhanced macroscopic cell transmission model and the cell transmission model with dispersion. The validation of the model regards the analysis of the wave propagation at the boundary region.Facundo StoraniRoberta Di PaceFrancesca BrunoChiara FioriSpringerOpenarticleMacroscopic traffic flow modelsMicroscopic traffic flow modelsHybrid traffic flow modelsTransportation engineeringTA1001-1280Transportation and communicationsHE1-9990ENEuropean Transport Research Review, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Macroscopic traffic flow models
Microscopic traffic flow models
Hybrid traffic flow models
Transportation engineering
TA1001-1280
Transportation and communications
HE1-9990
spellingShingle Macroscopic traffic flow models
Microscopic traffic flow models
Hybrid traffic flow models
Transportation engineering
TA1001-1280
Transportation and communications
HE1-9990
Facundo Storani
Roberta Di Pace
Francesca Bruno
Chiara Fiori
Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
description Abstract Background This paper compares a hybrid traffic flow model with benchmark macroscopic and microscopic models. The proposed hybrid traffic flow model may be applied considering a mixed traffic flow and is based on the combination of the macroscopic cell transmission model and the microscopic cellular automata. Modelled variables The hybrid model is compared against three microscopic models, namely the Krauß model, the intelligent driver model and the cellular automata, and against two macroscopic models, the Cell Transmission Model and the Cell Transmission Model with dispersion, respectively. To this end, three main applications were considered: (i) a link with a signalised junction at the end, (ii) a signalised artery, and (iii) a grid network with signalised junctions. Results The numerical simulations show that the model provides acceptable results. Especially in terms of travel times, it has similar behaviour to the microscopic model. By contrast, it produces lower values of queue propagation than microscopic models (intrinsically dominated by stochastic phenomena), which are closer to the values shown by the enhanced macroscopic cell transmission model and the cell transmission model with dispersion. The validation of the model regards the analysis of the wave propagation at the boundary region.
format article
author Facundo Storani
Roberta Di Pace
Francesca Bruno
Chiara Fiori
author_facet Facundo Storani
Roberta Di Pace
Francesca Bruno
Chiara Fiori
author_sort Facundo Storani
title Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
title_short Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
title_full Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
title_fullStr Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
title_sort analysis and comparison of traffic flow models: a new hybrid traffic flow model vs benchmark models
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dba62aab1fd9400585a504b131e3b8fb
work_keys_str_mv AT facundostorani analysisandcomparisonoftrafficflowmodelsanewhybridtrafficflowmodelvsbenchmarkmodels
AT robertadipace analysisandcomparisonoftrafficflowmodelsanewhybridtrafficflowmodelvsbenchmarkmodels
AT francescabruno analysisandcomparisonoftrafficflowmodelsanewhybridtrafficflowmodelvsbenchmarkmodels
AT chiarafiori analysisandcomparisonoftrafficflowmodelsanewhybridtrafficflowmodelvsbenchmarkmodels
_version_ 1718408107271389184