Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer

Background: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) presented in recent years as a novel technique to achieve better outcome in circumferential margin (CRM) and distal margin (DRM) in lower rectal cancer operation. The current study aimed to assess the perioperative and pathological characterist...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Leila Ghahramani, Seyed Farhad Tayari, Alireza Izadi, Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi, Zahra Beizavi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dbaa1207a625420485d75a5a2fa41c80
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dbaa1207a625420485d75a5a2fa41c80
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dbaa1207a625420485d75a5a2fa41c802021-11-14T08:12:23ZComparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer2783-243010.30476/acrr.2021.88825.1072https://doaj.org/article/dbaa1207a625420485d75a5a2fa41c802020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://colorectalresearch.sums.ac.ir/article_47235_641391d04a4dd6f97294373bf8704043.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2783-2430Background: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) presented in recent years as a novel technique to achieve better outcome in circumferential margin (CRM) and distal margin (DRM) in lower rectal cancer operation. The current study aimed to assess the perioperative and pathological characteristics of TaTME in comparison with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, we enrolled all consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent TaTME and LaTME. Primary endpoints like circumferential rectal margin (CRM) status, distal rectal margin (DRM) status, and pathological outcomes, as well as secondary endpoints including perioperative outcomes (total blood loss, duration of hospitalization, anastomosis leakage, as well as 30-day mortality) were evaluated and compared statistically (α=0.05). Results: 11 patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma which was biopsy-proven, underwent TaTME, and 19 patients operated on using LaTME. Both groups were similar in the baseline characteristics. Also, the perioperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Regarding pathological outcomes, no patients with CRM Conclusion: TaTME is a reasonable procedure in patients with low rectal cancer. But no remarkable superiority was observed in this method compared to laparoscopy with respect to the pathological outcomes.Seyed Vahid HosseiniLeila GhahramaniSeyed Farhad TayariAlireza IzadiRazieh Sadat Mousavi-RoknabadiZahra BeizaviShiraz University of Medical Sciencesarticlecancerrectumlaparoscopycolorectal surgeryMedicineRENIranian Journal of Colorectal Research, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 181-186 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cancer
rectum
laparoscopy
colorectal surgery
Medicine
R
spellingShingle cancer
rectum
laparoscopy
colorectal surgery
Medicine
R
Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Leila Ghahramani
Seyed Farhad Tayari
Alireza Izadi
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi
Zahra Beizavi
Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
description Background: Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) presented in recent years as a novel technique to achieve better outcome in circumferential margin (CRM) and distal margin (DRM) in lower rectal cancer operation. The current study aimed to assess the perioperative and pathological characteristics of TaTME in comparison with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, we enrolled all consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent TaTME and LaTME. Primary endpoints like circumferential rectal margin (CRM) status, distal rectal margin (DRM) status, and pathological outcomes, as well as secondary endpoints including perioperative outcomes (total blood loss, duration of hospitalization, anastomosis leakage, as well as 30-day mortality) were evaluated and compared statistically (α=0.05). Results: 11 patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma which was biopsy-proven, underwent TaTME, and 19 patients operated on using LaTME. Both groups were similar in the baseline characteristics. Also, the perioperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Regarding pathological outcomes, no patients with CRM Conclusion: TaTME is a reasonable procedure in patients with low rectal cancer. But no remarkable superiority was observed in this method compared to laparoscopy with respect to the pathological outcomes.
format article
author Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Leila Ghahramani
Seyed Farhad Tayari
Alireza Izadi
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi
Zahra Beizavi
author_facet Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Leila Ghahramani
Seyed Farhad Tayari
Alireza Izadi
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi
Zahra Beizavi
author_sort Seyed Vahid Hosseini
title Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
title_short Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
title_full Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
title_sort comparison of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/dbaa1207a625420485d75a5a2fa41c80
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedvahidhosseini comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
AT leilaghahramani comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
AT seyedfarhadtayari comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
AT alirezaizadi comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
AT raziehsadatmousaviroknabadi comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
AT zahrabeizavi comparisonoftransanalversuslaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisioninlowrectalcancer
_version_ 1718429806965555200