Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system

Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nathan McDannold, Yongzhi Zhang, Jeffrey G. Supko, Chanikarn Power, Tao Sun, Natalia Vykhodtseva, Alexandra J. Golby, David A. Reardon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a2021-12-02T14:49:11ZBlood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system10.1038/s41598-020-65617-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a2020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65617-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions of FUS, FUS and 10 mg/kg irinotecan, or irinotecan alone. In each session, four volumetric sonications targeted 36 locations in one hemisphere. With feedback control based on recordings of acoustic emissions, 98% of the sonication targets (1045/1071) reached a pre-defined level of acoustic emission, while the probability of wideband emission (a signature for inertial cavitation) was than 1%. BBB disruption, evaluated by mapping the R1 relaxation rate after administration of an MRI contrast agent, was significantly higher in the sonicated hemisphere (P < 0.01). Histological evaluation found minimal tissue effects. Irinotecan concentrations in the brain were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with BBB disruption, but SN-38 was only detected in <50% of the samples and only with an excessive irinotecan dose. Irinotecan with BBB disruption did not impede tumor growth or increase survival. Overall these results demonstrate safe and controlled BBB disruption with a low-frequency clinical TcMRgFUS device. While irinotecan delivery to the brain was not neurotoxic, it did not improve outcomes in the F98 glioma model.Nathan McDannoldYongzhi ZhangJeffrey G. SupkoChanikarn PowerTao SunNatalia VykhodtsevaAlexandra J. GolbyDavid A. ReardonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nathan McDannold
Yongzhi Zhang
Jeffrey G. Supko
Chanikarn Power
Tao Sun
Natalia Vykhodtseva
Alexandra J. Golby
David A. Reardon
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
description Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions of FUS, FUS and 10 mg/kg irinotecan, or irinotecan alone. In each session, four volumetric sonications targeted 36 locations in one hemisphere. With feedback control based on recordings of acoustic emissions, 98% of the sonication targets (1045/1071) reached a pre-defined level of acoustic emission, while the probability of wideband emission (a signature for inertial cavitation) was than 1%. BBB disruption, evaluated by mapping the R1 relaxation rate after administration of an MRI contrast agent, was significantly higher in the sonicated hemisphere (P < 0.01). Histological evaluation found minimal tissue effects. Irinotecan concentrations in the brain were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with BBB disruption, but SN-38 was only detected in <50% of the samples and only with an excessive irinotecan dose. Irinotecan with BBB disruption did not impede tumor growth or increase survival. Overall these results demonstrate safe and controlled BBB disruption with a low-frequency clinical TcMRgFUS device. While irinotecan delivery to the brain was not neurotoxic, it did not improve outcomes in the F98 glioma model.
format article
author Nathan McDannold
Yongzhi Zhang
Jeffrey G. Supko
Chanikarn Power
Tao Sun
Natalia Vykhodtseva
Alexandra J. Golby
David A. Reardon
author_facet Nathan McDannold
Yongzhi Zhang
Jeffrey G. Supko
Chanikarn Power
Tao Sun
Natalia Vykhodtseva
Alexandra J. Golby
David A. Reardon
author_sort Nathan McDannold
title Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
title_short Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
title_full Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
title_fullStr Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
title_full_unstemmed Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
title_sort blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial mri-guided focused ultrasound system
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanmcdannold bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT yongzhizhang bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT jeffreygsupko bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT chanikarnpower bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT taosun bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT nataliavykhodtseva bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT alexandrajgolby bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
AT davidareardon bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem
_version_ 1718389537529397248