Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system
Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a2021-12-02T14:49:11ZBlood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system10.1038/s41598-020-65617-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a2020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65617-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions of FUS, FUS and 10 mg/kg irinotecan, or irinotecan alone. In each session, four volumetric sonications targeted 36 locations in one hemisphere. With feedback control based on recordings of acoustic emissions, 98% of the sonication targets (1045/1071) reached a pre-defined level of acoustic emission, while the probability of wideband emission (a signature for inertial cavitation) was than 1%. BBB disruption, evaluated by mapping the R1 relaxation rate after administration of an MRI contrast agent, was significantly higher in the sonicated hemisphere (P < 0.01). Histological evaluation found minimal tissue effects. Irinotecan concentrations in the brain were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with BBB disruption, but SN-38 was only detected in <50% of the samples and only with an excessive irinotecan dose. Irinotecan with BBB disruption did not impede tumor growth or increase survival. Overall these results demonstrate safe and controlled BBB disruption with a low-frequency clinical TcMRgFUS device. While irinotecan delivery to the brain was not neurotoxic, it did not improve outcomes in the F98 glioma model.Nathan McDannoldYongzhi ZhangJeffrey G. SupkoChanikarn PowerTao SunNatalia VykhodtsevaAlexandra J. GolbyDavid A. ReardonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Nathan McDannold Yongzhi Zhang Jeffrey G. Supko Chanikarn Power Tao Sun Natalia Vykhodtseva Alexandra J. Golby David A. Reardon Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
description |
Abstract We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions of FUS, FUS and 10 mg/kg irinotecan, or irinotecan alone. In each session, four volumetric sonications targeted 36 locations in one hemisphere. With feedback control based on recordings of acoustic emissions, 98% of the sonication targets (1045/1071) reached a pre-defined level of acoustic emission, while the probability of wideband emission (a signature for inertial cavitation) was than 1%. BBB disruption, evaluated by mapping the R1 relaxation rate after administration of an MRI contrast agent, was significantly higher in the sonicated hemisphere (P < 0.01). Histological evaluation found minimal tissue effects. Irinotecan concentrations in the brain were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with BBB disruption, but SN-38 was only detected in <50% of the samples and only with an excessive irinotecan dose. Irinotecan with BBB disruption did not impede tumor growth or increase survival. Overall these results demonstrate safe and controlled BBB disruption with a low-frequency clinical TcMRgFUS device. While irinotecan delivery to the brain was not neurotoxic, it did not improve outcomes in the F98 glioma model. |
format |
article |
author |
Nathan McDannold Yongzhi Zhang Jeffrey G. Supko Chanikarn Power Tao Sun Natalia Vykhodtseva Alexandra J. Golby David A. Reardon |
author_facet |
Nathan McDannold Yongzhi Zhang Jeffrey G. Supko Chanikarn Power Tao Sun Natalia Vykhodtseva Alexandra J. Golby David A. Reardon |
author_sort |
Nathan McDannold |
title |
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
title_short |
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
title_full |
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
title_fullStr |
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system |
title_sort |
blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial mri-guided focused ultrasound system |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/dbbc08312ca148409c6d22571344c92a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nathanmcdannold bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT yongzhizhang bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT jeffreygsupko bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT chanikarnpower bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT taosun bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT nataliavykhodtseva bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT alexandrajgolby bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem AT davidareardon bloodbrainbarrierdisruptionanddeliveryofirinotecaninaratmodelusingaclinicaltranscranialmriguidedfocusedultrasoundsystem |
_version_ |
1718389537529397248 |