COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Objectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 P...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amir Iqbal Ali, Shehzad Abbasi, Syed Mukarram Hussain
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2019
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b20
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b20
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b202021-11-12T06:07:55ZCOMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b202019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/2733/2141https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 Patients presenting in surgical OPD and undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures were included and randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. In group A, open technique (Hasson cannula) and in group B, closed technique (Veress needle) was used. All patients were monitored during surgery for any first access related complications and this was carried out at regular intervals. Data for each patient was recorded on patient’s proforma. Results: We found better safety profile of open (Hassan) method over close (Veress Needle). Except for more gas leakage in open group (6.2%) as compared to closed (5.1%), all other complications occurred more frequent in closed group. The mean access time in the Open Group (3.2 ± 1.1 minutes) was less than for the Closed Arm (5.4 ± 0.7 minutes). Conclusions: There was difference in frequency of complications in both groups with Open method being safer and rate of complication was less as compared to the close method.Amir Iqbal AliShehzad AbbasiSyed Mukarram HussainArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticlepneumoperitoneumveress needlelaparoscopyMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 69, Iss 2, Pp 255-261 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic pneumoperitoneum
veress needle
laparoscopy
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle pneumoperitoneum
veress needle
laparoscopy
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
description Objectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 Patients presenting in surgical OPD and undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures were included and randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. In group A, open technique (Hasson cannula) and in group B, closed technique (Veress needle) was used. All patients were monitored during surgery for any first access related complications and this was carried out at regular intervals. Data for each patient was recorded on patient’s proforma. Results: We found better safety profile of open (Hassan) method over close (Veress Needle). Except for more gas leakage in open group (6.2%) as compared to closed (5.1%), all other complications occurred more frequent in closed group. The mean access time in the Open Group (3.2 ± 1.1 minutes) was less than for the Closed Arm (5.4 ± 0.7 minutes). Conclusions: There was difference in frequency of complications in both groups with Open method being safer and rate of complication was less as compared to the close method.
format article
author Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
author_facet Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
author_sort Amir Iqbal Ali
title COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_short COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_full COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_sort comparison of open (hasson) and closed (veress needle) methods of creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b20
work_keys_str_mv AT amiriqbalali comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT shehzadabbasi comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT syedmukarramhussain comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries
_version_ 1718431200333266944