Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks

A space station is a typical phased-mission system, and assessing its reliability during its configuration is an important engineering action. Traditional methods usually require extensive data to carry out a layered reliability assessment from components to the system. These methods suffer from lac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaopeng Li, Fuqiu Li
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dc7f7494d7e84d19b7664111b2fcb9ae
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dc7f7494d7e84d19b7664111b2fcb9ae
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dc7f7494d7e84d19b7664111b2fcb9ae2021-11-11T15:17:44ZReliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks10.3390/app1121102582076-3417https://doaj.org/article/dc7f7494d7e84d19b7664111b2fcb9ae2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10258https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417A space station is a typical phased-mission system, and assessing its reliability during its configuration is an important engineering action. Traditional methods usually require extensive data to carry out a layered reliability assessment from components to the system. These methods suffer from lack of sufficient test data, and the assessment process becomes very difficult, especially in the early stage of the configuration. This paper proposes a reliability assessment method for the space station configuration mission, using multi-layer and multi-type risks. Firstly, the risk layer and the risk type for the space station configuration are defined and identified. Then, the key configuration risks are identified comprehensively, considering their occurrence likelihood and consequence severity. High load risks are identified through risk propagation feature analysis. Finally, the configuration reliability model is built and the state probabilities are computed, based on the probabilistic risk propagation assessment (PRPA) method using the assessment probability data. Two issues are addressed in this paper: (1) how to build the configuration reliability model with three layers and four types of risks in the early stage of the configuration; (2) how to quantitatively assess the configuration mission reliability using data from the existing operational database and data describing the propagation features. The proposed method could be a useful tool for the complex aerospace system reliability assessment in the early stage.Xiaopeng LiFuqiu LiMDPI AGarticlereliability assessmentrisk propagationPRPAmulti-layer risksmulti-type risksspace stationTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10258, p 10258 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic reliability assessment
risk propagation
PRPA
multi-layer risks
multi-type risks
space station
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle reliability assessment
risk propagation
PRPA
multi-layer risks
multi-type risks
space station
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Xiaopeng Li
Fuqiu Li
Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
description A space station is a typical phased-mission system, and assessing its reliability during its configuration is an important engineering action. Traditional methods usually require extensive data to carry out a layered reliability assessment from components to the system. These methods suffer from lack of sufficient test data, and the assessment process becomes very difficult, especially in the early stage of the configuration. This paper proposes a reliability assessment method for the space station configuration mission, using multi-layer and multi-type risks. Firstly, the risk layer and the risk type for the space station configuration are defined and identified. Then, the key configuration risks are identified comprehensively, considering their occurrence likelihood and consequence severity. High load risks are identified through risk propagation feature analysis. Finally, the configuration reliability model is built and the state probabilities are computed, based on the probabilistic risk propagation assessment (PRPA) method using the assessment probability data. Two issues are addressed in this paper: (1) how to build the configuration reliability model with three layers and four types of risks in the early stage of the configuration; (2) how to quantitatively assess the configuration mission reliability using data from the existing operational database and data describing the propagation features. The proposed method could be a useful tool for the complex aerospace system reliability assessment in the early stage.
format article
author Xiaopeng Li
Fuqiu Li
author_facet Xiaopeng Li
Fuqiu Li
author_sort Xiaopeng Li
title Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
title_short Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
title_full Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
title_fullStr Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
title_full_unstemmed Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks
title_sort reliability assessment of space station based on multi-layer and multi-type risks
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dc7f7494d7e84d19b7664111b2fcb9ae
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaopengli reliabilityassessmentofspacestationbasedonmultilayerandmultityperisks
AT fuqiuli reliabilityassessmentofspacestationbasedonmultilayerandmultityperisks
_version_ 1718435589827592192