Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM

In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: J. Pelfrene, S. van Dam, R. Sevenois, F. Gilabert, W. van Paepegem
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Challenging Glass Conference 2016
Materias:
FEM
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f2126602021-12-04T05:12:36ZFracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM10.7480/cgc.5.22702589-8019https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f2126602016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://proceedings.challengingglass.com/index.php/cgc/article/view/165https://doaj.org/toc/2589-8019 In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure behaviour of an element are possible, differentiated by the physical correctness of their representation and by their implications on the numerical stability of the calculation. In this paper, three failure models are characterised by use of a unit element model and evaluated for the drop weight impact on a monolithic glass plate. Several issues can be identified: (i) incorrect calculation of fracture energy for large-sized elements; (ii) shock wave propagation upon deletion of an element leading to spurious failure of other elements; (iii) unrealistic crack formation when the failure model does not account for crack directionality. A crack delay failure model for structural glass is proposed to avoid the aforementioned problems. This failure model uses only physical material properties as input and limits the damage rate during fracture. J. PelfreneS. van DamR. SevenoisF. GilabertW. van PaepegemChallenging Glass ConferencearticleGlassBrittleFractureFEMElement DeletionClay industries. Ceramics. GlassTP785-869ENChallenging Glass Conference Proceedings, Vol 5 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Glass
Brittle
Fracture
FEM
Element Deletion
Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass
TP785-869
spellingShingle Glass
Brittle
Fracture
FEM
Element Deletion
Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass
TP785-869
J. Pelfrene
S. van Dam
R. Sevenois
F. Gilabert
W. van Paepegem
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
description In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure behaviour of an element are possible, differentiated by the physical correctness of their representation and by their implications on the numerical stability of the calculation. In this paper, three failure models are characterised by use of a unit element model and evaluated for the drop weight impact on a monolithic glass plate. Several issues can be identified: (i) incorrect calculation of fracture energy for large-sized elements; (ii) shock wave propagation upon deletion of an element leading to spurious failure of other elements; (iii) unrealistic crack formation when the failure model does not account for crack directionality. A crack delay failure model for structural glass is proposed to avoid the aforementioned problems. This failure model uses only physical material properties as input and limits the damage rate during fracture.
format article
author J. Pelfrene
S. van Dam
R. Sevenois
F. Gilabert
W. van Paepegem
author_facet J. Pelfrene
S. van Dam
R. Sevenois
F. Gilabert
W. van Paepegem
author_sort J. Pelfrene
title Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
title_short Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
title_full Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
title_fullStr Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
title_sort fracture simulation of structural glass by element deletion in explicit fem
publisher Challenging Glass Conference
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660
work_keys_str_mv AT jpelfrene fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem
AT svandam fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem
AT rsevenois fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem
AT fgilabert fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem
AT wvanpaepegem fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem
_version_ 1718372882328846336