Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM
In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Challenging Glass Conference
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f2126602021-12-04T05:12:36ZFracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM10.7480/cgc.5.22702589-8019https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f2126602016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://proceedings.challengingglass.com/index.php/cgc/article/view/165https://doaj.org/toc/2589-8019 In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure behaviour of an element are possible, differentiated by the physical correctness of their representation and by their implications on the numerical stability of the calculation. In this paper, three failure models are characterised by use of a unit element model and evaluated for the drop weight impact on a monolithic glass plate. Several issues can be identified: (i) incorrect calculation of fracture energy for large-sized elements; (ii) shock wave propagation upon deletion of an element leading to spurious failure of other elements; (iii) unrealistic crack formation when the failure model does not account for crack directionality. A crack delay failure model for structural glass is proposed to avoid the aforementioned problems. This failure model uses only physical material properties as input and limits the damage rate during fracture. J. PelfreneS. van DamR. SevenoisF. GilabertW. van PaepegemChallenging Glass ConferencearticleGlassBrittleFractureFEMElement DeletionClay industries. Ceramics. GlassTP785-869ENChallenging Glass Conference Proceedings, Vol 5 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Glass Brittle Fracture FEM Element Deletion Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass TP785-869 |
spellingShingle |
Glass Brittle Fracture FEM Element Deletion Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass TP785-869 J. Pelfrene S. van Dam R. Sevenois F. Gilabert W. van Paepegem Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
description |
In finite element simulation of glass cracking for practical engineering problems, the method of element deletion is often used despite its shortcomings. With this technique, an element is removed from the system upon reaching a certain failure criterion. Many different formulations for the failure behaviour of an element are possible, differentiated by the physical correctness of their representation and by their implications on the numerical stability of the calculation. In this paper, three failure models are characterised by use of a unit element model and evaluated for the drop weight impact on a monolithic glass plate. Several issues can be identified: (i) incorrect calculation of fracture energy for large-sized elements; (ii) shock wave propagation upon deletion of an element leading to spurious failure of other elements; (iii) unrealistic crack formation when the failure model does not account for crack directionality. A crack delay failure model for structural glass is proposed to avoid the aforementioned problems. This failure model uses only physical material properties as input and limits the damage rate during fracture.
|
format |
article |
author |
J. Pelfrene S. van Dam R. Sevenois F. Gilabert W. van Paepegem |
author_facet |
J. Pelfrene S. van Dam R. Sevenois F. Gilabert W. van Paepegem |
author_sort |
J. Pelfrene |
title |
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
title_short |
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
title_full |
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
title_fullStr |
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fracture Simulation of Structural Glass by Element Deletion in Explicit FEM |
title_sort |
fracture simulation of structural glass by element deletion in explicit fem |
publisher |
Challenging Glass Conference |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/dcc047db103341e6ae00a7e80f212660 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jpelfrene fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem AT svandam fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem AT rsevenois fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem AT fgilabert fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem AT wvanpaepegem fracturesimulationofstructuralglassbyelementdeletioninexplicitfem |
_version_ |
1718372882328846336 |