The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform.
<h4>Background</h4>Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects ~6-7 million people worldwide. Significant limitations still exist in our understanding of CD. Harnessing individual participant data (IPD) from studies could support more in-depth analyses to addre...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dcd21cb307b9408ea2efdc4b2c2c13ac |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:dcd21cb307b9408ea2efdc4b2c2c13ac |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:dcd21cb307b9408ea2efdc4b2c2c13ac2021-12-02T20:24:17ZThe Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform.1935-27271935-273510.1371/journal.pntd.0009697https://doaj.org/article/dcd21cb307b9408ea2efdc4b2c2c13ac2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009697https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735<h4>Background</h4>Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects ~6-7 million people worldwide. Significant limitations still exist in our understanding of CD. Harnessing individual participant data (IPD) from studies could support more in-depth analyses to address the many outstanding research questions. This systematic review aims to describe the characteristics and treatment practices of clinical studies in CD and assess the breadth and availability of research data for the potential establishment of a data-sharing platform.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>This review includes prospective CD clinical studies published after 1997 with patients receiving a trypanocidal treatment. The following electronic databases and clinical trial registry platforms were searched: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, Scielo, Clintrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Of the 11,966 unique citations screened, 109 (0.9%) studies (31 observational and 78 interventional) representing 23,116 patients were included. Diagnosis for patient enrolment required 1 positive test result in 5 (4.6%) studies (2 used molecular method, 1 used molecular and serology, 2 used serology and parasitological methods), 2 in 60 (55.0%), 3 in 14 (12.8%) and 4 or more in 4 (3.7%) studies. A description of treatment regimen was available for 19,199 (83.1%) patients, of whom 14,605 (76.1%) received an active treatment and 4,594 (23.9%) were assigned to a placebo/no-treatment. Of the 14,605 patients who received an active treatment, benznidazole was administered in 12,467 (85.4%), nifurtimox in 825 (5.6%), itraconazole in 284 (1.9%), allopurinol in 251 (1.7%) and other drugs in 286 (1.9%). Assessment of efficacy varied largely and was based primarily on biological outcome; parasitological efficacy relied on serology in 67/85 (78.8%) studies, molecular methods in 52/85 (61.2%), parasitological in 34/85 (40.0%), microscopy in 3/85 (3.5%) and immunohistochemistry in 1/85 (1.2%). The median time at which parasitological assessment was carried out was 79 days [interquartile range (IQR): 30-180] for the first assessment, 180 days [IQR: 60-500] for second, and 270 days [IQR: 18-545] for the third assessment.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This review demonstrates the heterogeneity of clinical practice in CD treatment and in the conduct of clinical studies. The sheer volume of potential IPD identified demonstrates the potential for development of an IPD platform for CD and that such efforts would enable in-depth analyses to optimise the limited pharmacopoeia of CD and inform prospective data collection.Brittany J MaguirePrabin DahalSumayyah RashanRoland NguAnca BoonColin ForsythNathalie Strub-WourgaftEric ChatelainFabiana BarreiraSergio Sosa-EstaniPhilippe J GuérinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleArctic medicine. Tropical medicineRC955-962Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e0009697 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Brittany J Maguire Prabin Dahal Sumayyah Rashan Roland Ngu Anca Boon Colin Forsyth Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft Eric Chatelain Fabiana Barreira Sergio Sosa-Estani Philippe J Guérin The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects ~6-7 million people worldwide. Significant limitations still exist in our understanding of CD. Harnessing individual participant data (IPD) from studies could support more in-depth analyses to address the many outstanding research questions. This systematic review aims to describe the characteristics and treatment practices of clinical studies in CD and assess the breadth and availability of research data for the potential establishment of a data-sharing platform.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>This review includes prospective CD clinical studies published after 1997 with patients receiving a trypanocidal treatment. The following electronic databases and clinical trial registry platforms were searched: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, Scielo, Clintrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Of the 11,966 unique citations screened, 109 (0.9%) studies (31 observational and 78 interventional) representing 23,116 patients were included. Diagnosis for patient enrolment required 1 positive test result in 5 (4.6%) studies (2 used molecular method, 1 used molecular and serology, 2 used serology and parasitological methods), 2 in 60 (55.0%), 3 in 14 (12.8%) and 4 or more in 4 (3.7%) studies. A description of treatment regimen was available for 19,199 (83.1%) patients, of whom 14,605 (76.1%) received an active treatment and 4,594 (23.9%) were assigned to a placebo/no-treatment. Of the 14,605 patients who received an active treatment, benznidazole was administered in 12,467 (85.4%), nifurtimox in 825 (5.6%), itraconazole in 284 (1.9%), allopurinol in 251 (1.7%) and other drugs in 286 (1.9%). Assessment of efficacy varied largely and was based primarily on biological outcome; parasitological efficacy relied on serology in 67/85 (78.8%) studies, molecular methods in 52/85 (61.2%), parasitological in 34/85 (40.0%), microscopy in 3/85 (3.5%) and immunohistochemistry in 1/85 (1.2%). The median time at which parasitological assessment was carried out was 79 days [interquartile range (IQR): 30-180] for the first assessment, 180 days [IQR: 60-500] for second, and 270 days [IQR: 18-545] for the third assessment.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This review demonstrates the heterogeneity of clinical practice in CD treatment and in the conduct of clinical studies. The sheer volume of potential IPD identified demonstrates the potential for development of an IPD platform for CD and that such efforts would enable in-depth analyses to optimise the limited pharmacopoeia of CD and inform prospective data collection. |
format |
article |
author |
Brittany J Maguire Prabin Dahal Sumayyah Rashan Roland Ngu Anca Boon Colin Forsyth Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft Eric Chatelain Fabiana Barreira Sergio Sosa-Estani Philippe J Guérin |
author_facet |
Brittany J Maguire Prabin Dahal Sumayyah Rashan Roland Ngu Anca Boon Colin Forsyth Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft Eric Chatelain Fabiana Barreira Sergio Sosa-Estani Philippe J Guérin |
author_sort |
Brittany J Maguire |
title |
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
title_short |
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
title_full |
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
title_fullStr |
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
title_sort |
chagas disease study landscape: a systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/dcd21cb307b9408ea2efdc4b2c2c13ac |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brittanyjmaguire thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT prabindahal thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT sumayyahrashan thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT rolandngu thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT ancaboon thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT colinforsyth thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT nathaliestrubwourgaft thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT ericchatelain thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT fabianabarreira thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT sergiososaestani thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT philippejguerin thechagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT brittanyjmaguire chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT prabindahal chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT sumayyahrashan chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT rolandngu chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT ancaboon chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT colinforsyth chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT nathaliestrubwourgaft chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT ericchatelain chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT fabianabarreira chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT sergiososaestani chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform AT philippejguerin chagasdiseasestudylandscapeasystematicreviewofclinicalandobservationalantiparasitictreatmentstudiestoassessthepotentialforestablishinganindividualparticipantleveldataplatform |
_version_ |
1718374080145522688 |