EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE

The international actorness of the European Union is an object of prolonged scholarly and political debates. As an association of states with both complementary and competing interests it faces the problem of collective action. The EU elaborated several mechanisms to mitigate it effect, which, howev...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju. D. Zhdanova, I. A. Istomin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd1126788fec402f995dd25e4f5f148b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd1126788fec402f995dd25e4f5f148b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd1126788fec402f995dd25e4f5f148b2021-11-23T14:50:38ZEU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56-91-113https://doaj.org/article/dd1126788fec402f995dd25e4f5f148b2017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/672https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The international actorness of the European Union is an object of prolonged scholarly and political debates. As an association of states with both complementary and competing interests it faces the problem of collective action. The EU elaborated several mechanisms to mitigate it effect, which, however, do not necessarily avail it to conduct a coherent policy towards other major powers. The current article demonstrates that when it comes to defending European interests in the world arena,Brusselsfaces a range of challenges even in the most developed spheres of the integration process, such as international economic cooperation. Due to the insufficiency of hegemony, common identity and institutional weakness, the member states of the European Union tend to pursue their own private interests, rather than speak for the common interest. This tendency is traced in the article using the record of relations between the EU andChina. Despite the fact that the EU is, in many ways, wealthier and technologically more developed thanChina, its dependence on huge financial resources flowing from the Asian ascending power has grown in 2010s. While the European Commission’s goal is to secure access to Chinese market for European companies, individual member states vie for Chinese investments. To illustrate this, the article highlights competitive strategies ofGermany,Great Britain,Franceand Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). It examines engagement of the CEECs in the Chinese initiative “16+1”. The authors conclude that competition between European states in financial sphere reduces their bargaining leverage not only in economic matters, but also on some political issues.Ju. D. ZhdanovaI. A. IstominMGIMO University Pressarticleeuropean unionchinacollective action problemcentral and eastern europeeuropean troikaeconomic cooperationInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(56), Pp 91-113 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic european union
china
collective action problem
central and eastern europe
european troika
economic cooperation
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle european union
china
collective action problem
central and eastern europe
european troika
economic cooperation
International relations
JZ2-6530
Ju. D. Zhdanova
I. A. Istomin
EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
description The international actorness of the European Union is an object of prolonged scholarly and political debates. As an association of states with both complementary and competing interests it faces the problem of collective action. The EU elaborated several mechanisms to mitigate it effect, which, however, do not necessarily avail it to conduct a coherent policy towards other major powers. The current article demonstrates that when it comes to defending European interests in the world arena,Brusselsfaces a range of challenges even in the most developed spheres of the integration process, such as international economic cooperation. Due to the insufficiency of hegemony, common identity and institutional weakness, the member states of the European Union tend to pursue their own private interests, rather than speak for the common interest. This tendency is traced in the article using the record of relations between the EU andChina. Despite the fact that the EU is, in many ways, wealthier and technologically more developed thanChina, its dependence on huge financial resources flowing from the Asian ascending power has grown in 2010s. While the European Commission’s goal is to secure access to Chinese market for European companies, individual member states vie for Chinese investments. To illustrate this, the article highlights competitive strategies ofGermany,Great Britain,Franceand Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). It examines engagement of the CEECs in the Chinese initiative “16+1”. The authors conclude that competition between European states in financial sphere reduces their bargaining leverage not only in economic matters, but also on some political issues.
format article
author Ju. D. Zhdanova
I. A. Istomin
author_facet Ju. D. Zhdanova
I. A. Istomin
author_sort Ju. D. Zhdanova
title EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
title_short EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
title_full EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
title_fullStr EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
title_full_unstemmed EU REACTIONS TO CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE
title_sort eu reactions to china’s economic rise
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/dd1126788fec402f995dd25e4f5f148b
work_keys_str_mv AT judzhdanova eureactionstochinaseconomicrise
AT iaistomin eureactionstochinaseconomicrise
_version_ 1718416734627561472