Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.

<h4>Background</h4>Measuring implicit attitudes is difficult due to social desirability (SD). A new method, the Emotion Based Approach (EBA), can solve this by using emotions from a display of faces as response categories. We applied this on an EBA Spirituality tool (EBA-SPT) and an Actu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klara Malinakova, Richard Korinek, Peter Tavel, Iva Polackova Solcova, Harold G Koenig, Jitse P van Dijk, Sijmen A Reijneveld
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd2402fd2961431995f784bd2b877be8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd2402fd2961431995f784bd2b877be8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd2402fd2961431995f784bd2b877be82021-12-02T20:05:35ZUsing photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0250922https://doaj.org/article/dd2402fd2961431995f784bd2b877be82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250922https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Measuring implicit attitudes is difficult due to social desirability (SD). A new method, the Emotion Based Approach (EBA), can solve this by using emotions from a display of faces as response categories. We applied this on an EBA Spirituality tool (EBA-SPT) and an Actual Situation tool (EBA-AST). Our aim was to assess the structure, reliability and validity of the tools and to compare two EBA assessment approaches, i.e., an explicit one (only assessing final replies to items) and an implicit one (assessing also the selection process).<h4>Methods</h4>We obtained data on a sample of Czech adults (n = 522, age 30.3±12.58; 27.0% men) via an online survey; cortisol was assessed in 46 participants. We assessed the structure and psychometric properties (internal consistency and test-retest reliability; convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity) of the EBA, and examined the differences between explicit vs. implicit EBA approaches.<h4>Results</h4>We found an acceptable-good internal consistency reliability of the EBA tools, acceptable discriminant validity between them and low (neutral expression) to good (joy) test-retest reliability for concrete emotions assessed by the tools. An implicit EBA approach showed stronger correlations between emotions and weaker convergent validity, but higher criterion validity, than an explicit approach and standard questionnaires.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Compared to standard questionnaires, EBA is a more reliable approach for measuring attitudes, with an implicit approach that reflects the selection process yielding the best results.Klara MalinakovaRichard KorinekPeter TavelIva Polackova SolcovaHarold G KoenigJitse P van DijkSijmen A ReijneveldPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0250922 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Klara Malinakova
Richard Korinek
Peter Tavel
Iva Polackova Solcova
Harold G Koenig
Jitse P van Dijk
Sijmen A Reijneveld
Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
description <h4>Background</h4>Measuring implicit attitudes is difficult due to social desirability (SD). A new method, the Emotion Based Approach (EBA), can solve this by using emotions from a display of faces as response categories. We applied this on an EBA Spirituality tool (EBA-SPT) and an Actual Situation tool (EBA-AST). Our aim was to assess the structure, reliability and validity of the tools and to compare two EBA assessment approaches, i.e., an explicit one (only assessing final replies to items) and an implicit one (assessing also the selection process).<h4>Methods</h4>We obtained data on a sample of Czech adults (n = 522, age 30.3±12.58; 27.0% men) via an online survey; cortisol was assessed in 46 participants. We assessed the structure and psychometric properties (internal consistency and test-retest reliability; convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity) of the EBA, and examined the differences between explicit vs. implicit EBA approaches.<h4>Results</h4>We found an acceptable-good internal consistency reliability of the EBA tools, acceptable discriminant validity between them and low (neutral expression) to good (joy) test-retest reliability for concrete emotions assessed by the tools. An implicit EBA approach showed stronger correlations between emotions and weaker convergent validity, but higher criterion validity, than an explicit approach and standard questionnaires.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Compared to standard questionnaires, EBA is a more reliable approach for measuring attitudes, with an implicit approach that reflects the selection process yielding the best results.
format article
author Klara Malinakova
Richard Korinek
Peter Tavel
Iva Polackova Solcova
Harold G Koenig
Jitse P van Dijk
Sijmen A Reijneveld
author_facet Klara Malinakova
Richard Korinek
Peter Tavel
Iva Polackova Solcova
Harold G Koenig
Jitse P van Dijk
Sijmen A Reijneveld
author_sort Klara Malinakova
title Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
title_short Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
title_full Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
title_fullStr Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
title_full_unstemmed Using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
title_sort using photos of basic facial expressions as a new approach to measuring implicit attitudes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dd2402fd2961431995f784bd2b877be8
work_keys_str_mv AT klaramalinakova usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT richardkorinek usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT petertavel usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT ivapolackovasolcova usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT haroldgkoenig usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT jitsepvandijk usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
AT sijmenareijneveld usingphotosofbasicfacialexpressionsasanewapproachtomeasuringimplicitattitudes
_version_ 1718375511433936896