RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE

Laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is based on detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). E.g., aPLs are directed against conformational epitopes of the so-called “co-factor” proteins: β2-gycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), annexin V (An V) and prothrombin (Pt) that are formed during...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O. Yu. Tkachenko, S. V Lapin, A. A. Shmonin, L. N. Solovyova, E. A. Bondareva, S. A. Selkov, S. V. Chepanov, Areg A. Totolian, Dirk Roggenbuck
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: SPb RAACI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd2883eb948d44c78372e9204484807f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd2883eb948d44c78372e9204484807f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd2883eb948d44c78372e9204484807f2021-11-18T08:03:47ZRANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE1563-06252313-741X10.15789/1563-0625-2018-5-753-762https://doaj.org/article/dd2883eb948d44c78372e9204484807f2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mimmun.ru/mimmun/article/view/1644https://doaj.org/toc/1563-0625https://doaj.org/toc/2313-741XLaboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is based on detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). E.g., aPLs are directed against conformational epitopes of the so-called “co-factor” proteins: β2-gycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), annexin V (An V) and prothrombin (Pt) that are formed during interaction with phospholipids – cardiolipin (CL), phosphatic acid (Pha), phosphatidylcholine (Pch), phosphatidylethanolamine (Pe), phosphatidylglycerol (Pg), phosphatidylinositol (Pi), phosphatidylserine (Ps). A routine methodology of detection based on ELISA testing is challenged by new tests when the antigen is absorbed on another kind of support like microbeads or membranes that can influence density of conformational epitopes for aPL’s binding. The aim of our study was to compare the results of aPLs detection by ELISA and multi-line immunodot assay (MLD). We collected blood serum samples from 45 patients with noncardioembolic ischemic strokes, 19 patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, 44 females with recurrent miscarriages, and 50 clinically healthy donors. To compare the results of aPL detection by ELISA and MLD kits, the test systems from different manufacturers were evaluated. We used an ELISA kits for detection of antibodies to CL IgG, aCL IgM, β2-GP1 produced by Euroimmun AG (Mr1) and Orgentec Diagnostica GmbH (Mr2) and MLD – for detection of antibodies to CL, β2-GP1, Pch, Pe, Pg, Pi, Ps, AnV and Pt (Medipan GmbH, Mr3). When a cut-off titer was used as the main index, 30.5% of patients were aPLs-positive with ELISA method by Mr1 and 38%, wiht Mr2. By MLD aPls were detected in 30% of patients. In the same cohort, medium and high aPLs titers (> 40 U/mL) were determined in 12% of patients using ELISA kits. Positive and highly positive aPLs titers were determined in 16% when using a new method by Mr3. Medium and high titer were detected only for antibodies to β2-GP1, CL, An V, Pha and Phs. The use of ELISA approach for detection of aPLs in patients with thrombosis and obstetric pathology is associated with relatively high number of low-positive ELISA results. Due to higher sensitivity for medium and high aPLs titers, MLD testing may be used as a confirming method for APS diagnosis.O. Yu. TkachenkoS. V LapinA. A. ShmoninL. N. SolovyovaE. A. BondarevaS. A. SelkovS. V. ChepanovAreg A. TotolianDirk RoggenbuckSPb RAACIarticleantiphospholipid syndromeantiphospholipid antibodiesenzyme-linked immunosorbent assaysmulti-line dot assaynew methodsImmunologic diseases. AllergyRC581-607RUMedicinskaâ Immunologiâ, Vol 20, Iss 5, Pp 753-762 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic antiphospholipid syndrome
antiphospholipid antibodies
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
multi-line dot assay
new methods
Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
spellingShingle antiphospholipid syndrome
antiphospholipid antibodies
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
multi-line dot assay
new methods
Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
O. Yu. Tkachenko
S. V Lapin
A. A. Shmonin
L. N. Solovyova
E. A. Bondareva
S. A. Selkov
S. V. Chepanov
Areg A. Totolian
Dirk Roggenbuck
RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
description Laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is based on detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). E.g., aPLs are directed against conformational epitopes of the so-called “co-factor” proteins: β2-gycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), annexin V (An V) and prothrombin (Pt) that are formed during interaction with phospholipids – cardiolipin (CL), phosphatic acid (Pha), phosphatidylcholine (Pch), phosphatidylethanolamine (Pe), phosphatidylglycerol (Pg), phosphatidylinositol (Pi), phosphatidylserine (Ps). A routine methodology of detection based on ELISA testing is challenged by new tests when the antigen is absorbed on another kind of support like microbeads or membranes that can influence density of conformational epitopes for aPL’s binding. The aim of our study was to compare the results of aPLs detection by ELISA and multi-line immunodot assay (MLD). We collected blood serum samples from 45 patients with noncardioembolic ischemic strokes, 19 patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, 44 females with recurrent miscarriages, and 50 clinically healthy donors. To compare the results of aPL detection by ELISA and MLD kits, the test systems from different manufacturers were evaluated. We used an ELISA kits for detection of antibodies to CL IgG, aCL IgM, β2-GP1 produced by Euroimmun AG (Mr1) and Orgentec Diagnostica GmbH (Mr2) and MLD – for detection of antibodies to CL, β2-GP1, Pch, Pe, Pg, Pi, Ps, AnV and Pt (Medipan GmbH, Mr3). When a cut-off titer was used as the main index, 30.5% of patients were aPLs-positive with ELISA method by Mr1 and 38%, wiht Mr2. By MLD aPls were detected in 30% of patients. In the same cohort, medium and high aPLs titers (> 40 U/mL) were determined in 12% of patients using ELISA kits. Positive and highly positive aPLs titers were determined in 16% when using a new method by Mr3. Medium and high titer were detected only for antibodies to β2-GP1, CL, An V, Pha and Phs. The use of ELISA approach for detection of aPLs in patients with thrombosis and obstetric pathology is associated with relatively high number of low-positive ELISA results. Due to higher sensitivity for medium and high aPLs titers, MLD testing may be used as a confirming method for APS diagnosis.
format article
author O. Yu. Tkachenko
S. V Lapin
A. A. Shmonin
L. N. Solovyova
E. A. Bondareva
S. A. Selkov
S. V. Chepanov
Areg A. Totolian
Dirk Roggenbuck
author_facet O. Yu. Tkachenko
S. V Lapin
A. A. Shmonin
L. N. Solovyova
E. A. Bondareva
S. A. Selkov
S. V. Chepanov
Areg A. Totolian
Dirk Roggenbuck
author_sort O. Yu. Tkachenko
title RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
title_short RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
title_full RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
title_fullStr RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
title_full_unstemmed RANGING OF ANTIPHOSPOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN THE PATIENTS WITH THROMBOPHILIA AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE
title_sort ranging of antiphospolipid antibodies in the patients with thrombophilia and recurrent miscarriage
publisher SPb RAACI
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/dd2883eb948d44c78372e9204484807f
work_keys_str_mv AT oyutkachenko rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT svlapin rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT aashmonin rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT lnsolovyova rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT eabondareva rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT saselkov rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT svchepanov rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT aregatotolian rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
AT dirkroggenbuck rangingofantiphospolipidantibodiesinthepatientswiththrombophiliaandrecurrentmiscarriage
_version_ 1718422385832493056