Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut

Abstract Findings from gut microbiome studies are strongly influenced by both experimental and analytical factors that can unintentionally bias their interpretation. Environment is also critical. Both co-housing and maternal effects are expected to affect microbiomes and have the potential to confou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurdeep Singh, Andrew Brass, Sheena M. Cruickshank, Christopher G. Knight
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd2e2f3314e44cd681b20f0ea2334bf2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd2e2f3314e44cd681b20f0ea2334bf2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd2e2f3314e44cd681b20f0ea2334bf22021-12-02T16:57:26ZCage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut10.1038/s41598-021-89185-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/dd2e2f3314e44cd681b20f0ea2334bf22021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89185-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Findings from gut microbiome studies are strongly influenced by both experimental and analytical factors that can unintentionally bias their interpretation. Environment is also critical. Both co-housing and maternal effects are expected to affect microbiomes and have the potential to confound other manipulated factors, such as genetics. We therefore analysed microbiome data from a mouse experiment using littermate controls and tested differences among genotypes (wildtype versus colitis prone-mdr1a −/− ), gut niches (stool versus mucus), host ages (6 versus 18 weeks), social groups (co-housed siblings of different genotypes) and maternal influence. We constructed a 16S phylogenetic tree from bacterial communities, fitting random forest models using all 428,234 clades identified. Models discriminated all criteria except host genotype, where no community differences were found. Host social groups differed in abundant, low-level, taxa whereas intermediate phylogenetic and abundance scales distinguished ages and niches. Thus, a carefully controlled experiment treating evolutionary clades of microbes equivalently without reference to taxonomy, clearly identifies whether and how gut microbial communities are distinct across ecologically important factors (niche and host age) and other experimental factors, notably cage effects and maternal influence. These findings highlight the importance of considering such environmental factors in future microbiome studies.Gurdeep SinghAndrew BrassSheena M. CruickshankChristopher G. KnightNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gurdeep Singh
Andrew Brass
Sheena M. Cruickshank
Christopher G. Knight
Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
description Abstract Findings from gut microbiome studies are strongly influenced by both experimental and analytical factors that can unintentionally bias their interpretation. Environment is also critical. Both co-housing and maternal effects are expected to affect microbiomes and have the potential to confound other manipulated factors, such as genetics. We therefore analysed microbiome data from a mouse experiment using littermate controls and tested differences among genotypes (wildtype versus colitis prone-mdr1a −/− ), gut niches (stool versus mucus), host ages (6 versus 18 weeks), social groups (co-housed siblings of different genotypes) and maternal influence. We constructed a 16S phylogenetic tree from bacterial communities, fitting random forest models using all 428,234 clades identified. Models discriminated all criteria except host genotype, where no community differences were found. Host social groups differed in abundant, low-level, taxa whereas intermediate phylogenetic and abundance scales distinguished ages and niches. Thus, a carefully controlled experiment treating evolutionary clades of microbes equivalently without reference to taxonomy, clearly identifies whether and how gut microbial communities are distinct across ecologically important factors (niche and host age) and other experimental factors, notably cage effects and maternal influence. These findings highlight the importance of considering such environmental factors in future microbiome studies.
format article
author Gurdeep Singh
Andrew Brass
Sheena M. Cruickshank
Christopher G. Knight
author_facet Gurdeep Singh
Andrew Brass
Sheena M. Cruickshank
Christopher G. Knight
author_sort Gurdeep Singh
title Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
title_short Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
title_full Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
title_fullStr Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
title_full_unstemmed Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
title_sort cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dd2e2f3314e44cd681b20f0ea2334bf2
work_keys_str_mv AT gurdeepsingh cageandmaternaleffectsonthebacterialcommunitiesofthemurinegut
AT andrewbrass cageandmaternaleffectsonthebacterialcommunitiesofthemurinegut
AT sheenamcruickshank cageandmaternaleffectsonthebacterialcommunitiesofthemurinegut
AT christophergknight cageandmaternaleffectsonthebacterialcommunitiesofthemurinegut
_version_ 1718382594705326080