Neglect of publication bias compromises meta-analyses of educational research.
Because negative findings have less chance of getting published, available studies tend to be a biased sample. This leads to an inflation of effect size estimates to an unknown degree. To see how meta-analyses in education account for publication bias, we surveyed all meta-analyses published in the...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Ivan Ropovik, Matus Adamkovic, David Greger |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dd44a95b262245719d9e5570992d1e61 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
por: Yali Liu, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Limited antibody specificity compromises epitranscriptomic analyses
por: Mark Helm, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Lag times in the publication of network meta-analyses: a survey
por: Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Neglecting uncertainties biases house-elevation decisions to manage riverine flood risks
por: Mahkameh Zarekarizi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Publication bias and the tourism-led growth hypothesis.
por: Nikeel Nishkar Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)