Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis
Taro Kishi, Shinji Matsunaga, Nakao Iwata Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan Background: There is no conclusive evidence supporting the efficacy of memantine in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of memantine...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/dd83ed873e184510ba2f258a527f8d02 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:dd83ed873e184510ba2f258a527f8d02 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:dd83ed873e184510ba2f258a527f8d022021-12-02T06:19:43ZMemantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis1178-2021https://doaj.org/article/dd83ed873e184510ba2f258a527f8d022015-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/memantine-for-the-treatment-of-frontotemporal-dementia-a-meta-analysis-peer-reviewed-article-NDThttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Taro Kishi, Shinji Matsunaga, Nakao Iwata Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan Background: There is no conclusive evidence supporting the efficacy of memantine in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of memantine concerning the efficacy and tolerability of memantine in FTD.Methods: Studies were identified through searches of PubMed, databases of the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO citations up to April 10, 2015. Outcomes were Clinical Global Impression (primary), Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Zarit Burden Interview scores as well as all-cause discontinuation. Standardized mean difference and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were calculated.Results: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total n=130) met the inclusion criteria. Memantine was marginally superior to placebo as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression scores (standardized mean difference =-0.34, 95% confidence interval =-0.68–0.01, P=0.06). However, there were no significant differences in Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Zarit Burden Interview scores as well as all-cause discontinuation between memantine and placebo.Conclusion: Our results suggest that memantine may benefit FTD patients. However, because only two randomized controlled trials have addressed this issue, further studies using larger samples are needed. Keywords: frontotemporal dementia, memantine, meta-analysis, Clinical Global ImpressionKishi TMatsunaga SIwata NDove Medical PressarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 2883-2885 (2015) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 |
spellingShingle |
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 Kishi T Matsunaga S Iwata N Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
description |
Taro Kishi, Shinji Matsunaga, Nakao Iwata Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan Background: There is no conclusive evidence supporting the efficacy of memantine in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of memantine concerning the efficacy and tolerability of memantine in FTD.Methods: Studies were identified through searches of PubMed, databases of the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO citations up to April 10, 2015. Outcomes were Clinical Global Impression (primary), Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Zarit Burden Interview scores as well as all-cause discontinuation. Standardized mean difference and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were calculated.Results: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total n=130) met the inclusion criteria. Memantine was marginally superior to placebo as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression scores (standardized mean difference =-0.34, 95% confidence interval =-0.68–0.01, P=0.06). However, there were no significant differences in Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Zarit Burden Interview scores as well as all-cause discontinuation between memantine and placebo.Conclusion: Our results suggest that memantine may benefit FTD patients. However, because only two randomized controlled trials have addressed this issue, further studies using larger samples are needed. Keywords: frontotemporal dementia, memantine, meta-analysis, Clinical Global Impression |
format |
article |
author |
Kishi T Matsunaga S Iwata N |
author_facet |
Kishi T Matsunaga S Iwata N |
author_sort |
Kishi T |
title |
Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
title_short |
Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
title_full |
Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
title_sort |
memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/dd83ed873e184510ba2f258a527f8d02 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kishit memantineforthetreatmentoffrontotemporaldementiaametaanalysis AT matsunagas memantineforthetreatmentoffrontotemporaldementiaametaanalysis AT iwatan memantineforthetreatmentoffrontotemporaldementiaametaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718399964873228288 |