Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial

The purpose of the present study was to assess the influence of cavity size on the survival of conventional and CHX modified GIC in single surface primary molars receiving Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). A randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on 90 children wit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Roshan Noor Mohamed, Sakeenabi Basha, Jooie S. Joshi, Poornima Parameshwarappa
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	ART chlorhexidine GIC survival primary teeth single surface Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/dd928ef393b6474e8a0f54a24c22f7ba
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:dd928ef393b6474e8a0f54a24c22f7ba
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:dd928ef393b6474e8a0f54a24c22f7ba2021-11-11T15:24:14ZInfluence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial10.3390/app1121104382076-3417https://doaj.org/article/dd928ef393b6474e8a0f54a24c22f7ba2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10438https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417The purpose of the present study was to assess the influence of cavity size on the survival of conventional and CHX modified GIC in single surface primary molars receiving Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). A randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on 90 children with symmetrical bilateral single surface carious lesions on primary molars. The teeth were randomly allotted to the conventional GIC group (group 1, <i>n</i> = 90) and CHX modified GIC group (group 2, <i>n</i> = 90). Both groups received atraumatic restorative treatment under rubber dam isolation. The cavity size was measured in terms of depth, mesiodistal, and buccolingual dimensions. The survival of ART restorations was measured after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The difference in proportion was tested using the Kruskal–Wallis H test, and survival curve estimation was carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method. The overall survival of all ART restorations was 83.3% at 24 months for the total sample. The survival of conventional GIC at 24 months was 83.9%, and for CHX-modified GIC was 82.7% (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The collective overall success of 65.1% was seen in the cavity volume category of 10–29.9 mm<sup>3</sup>. CHX modified GIC showed high survival percentage (60%) with depth >3 mm. To conclude, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival percentage of conventional and CHX modified GIC. Survival percentage was highest for cavities with a volume of 10–19.9 mm<sup>3</sup>.Roshan Noor MohamedSakeenabi BashaJooie S. JoshiPoornima ParameshwarappaMDPI AGarticleARTchlorhexidineGICsurvivalprimary teethsingle surfaceTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10438, p 10438 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ART chlorhexidine GIC survival primary teeth single surface Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
spellingShingle	ART chlorhexidine GIC survival primary teeth single surface Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Roshan Noor Mohamed Sakeenabi Basha Jooie S. Joshi Poornima Parameshwarappa Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
description	The purpose of the present study was to assess the influence of cavity size on the survival of conventional and CHX modified GIC in single surface primary molars receiving Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). A randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on 90 children with symmetrical bilateral single surface carious lesions on primary molars. The teeth were randomly allotted to the conventional GIC group (group 1, <i>n</i> = 90) and CHX modified GIC group (group 2, <i>n</i> = 90). Both groups received atraumatic restorative treatment under rubber dam isolation. The cavity size was measured in terms of depth, mesiodistal, and buccolingual dimensions. The survival of ART restorations was measured after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The difference in proportion was tested using the Kruskal–Wallis H test, and survival curve estimation was carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method. The overall survival of all ART restorations was 83.3% at 24 months for the total sample. The survival of conventional GIC at 24 months was 83.9%, and for CHX-modified GIC was 82.7% (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The collective overall success of 65.1% was seen in the cavity volume category of 10–29.9 mm<sup>3</sup>. CHX modified GIC showed high survival percentage (60%) with depth >3 mm. To conclude, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival percentage of conventional and CHX modified GIC. Survival percentage was highest for cavities with a volume of 10–19.9 mm<sup>3</sup>.
format	article
author	Roshan Noor Mohamed Sakeenabi Basha Jooie S. Joshi Poornima Parameshwarappa
author_facet	Roshan Noor Mohamed Sakeenabi Basha Jooie S. Joshi Poornima Parameshwarappa
author_sort	Roshan Noor Mohamed
title	Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
title_short	Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
title_full	Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr	Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed	Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial
title_sort	influence of cavity size on the survival of single surface atraumatic restorative treatment using glass ionomer cement with or without chlorhexidine diacetate—a randomized trial
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/dd928ef393b6474e8a0f54a24c22f7ba
work_keys_str_mv	AT roshannoormohamed influenceofcavitysizeonthesurvivalofsinglesurfaceatraumaticrestorativetreatmentusingglassionomercementwithorwithoutchlorhexidinediacetatearandomizedtrial AT sakeenabibasha influenceofcavitysizeonthesurvivalofsinglesurfaceatraumaticrestorativetreatmentusingglassionomercementwithorwithoutchlorhexidinediacetatearandomizedtrial AT jooiesjoshi influenceofcavitysizeonthesurvivalofsinglesurfaceatraumaticrestorativetreatmentusingglassionomercementwithorwithoutchlorhexidinediacetatearandomizedtrial AT poornimaparameshwarappa influenceofcavitysizeonthesurvivalofsinglesurfaceatraumaticrestorativetreatmentusingglassionomercementwithorwithoutchlorhexidinediacetatearandomizedtrial
_version_	1718435398497075200

Influence of Cavity Size on the Survival of Single Surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement with or without Chlorhexidine Diacetate—A Randomized Trial

Ejemplares similares