Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism

Margaret R Park1, Michelle K Banks1, Bruce Applegate2, Thomas J Webster31School of Civil Engineering; 2Department of Food Science; 3School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USAAbstract: Surfaces with nanophase compared to conventional (or nanometer smooth) topographie...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margaret R Park, Michelle K Banks, Bruce Applegate, Thomas J Webster
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd96875a91a04d739cc99ffb497c0438
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd96875a91a04d739cc99ffb497c0438
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd96875a91a04d739cc99ffb497c04382021-12-02T04:23:48ZInfluence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism1176-91141178-2013https://doaj.org/article/dd96875a91a04d739cc99ffb497c04382008-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/influence-of-nanophase-titania-topography-on-bacterial-attachment-and--a2668https://doaj.org/toc/1176-9114https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013Margaret R Park1, Michelle K Banks1, Bruce Applegate2, Thomas J Webster31School of Civil Engineering; 2Department of Food Science; 3School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USAAbstract: Surfaces with nanophase compared to conventional (or nanometer smooth) topographies are known to have different properties of area, charge, and reactivity. Previously published research indicates that the attachment of certain bacteria (such as Pseudomonas fluorescens 5RL) is higher on surfaces with nanophase compared to conventional topographies, however, their effect on bacterial metabolism is unclear. Results presented here show that the adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens 5RL and Pseudomonas putida TVA8 was higher on nanophase than conventional titania. Importantly, in terms of metabolism, bacteria attached to the nanophase surfaces had higher bioluminescence rates than on the conventional surfaces under all nutrient conditions. Thus, the results from this study show greater select bacterial metabolism on nanometer than conventional topographies, critical results with strong consequences for the design of improved biosensors for bacteria detection.Keywords: bacteria, attachment, nanophase, topography, metabolism Margaret R ParkMichelle K BanksBruce ApplegateThomas J WebsterDove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2008, Iss Issue 4, Pp 497-504 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Margaret R Park
Michelle K Banks
Bruce Applegate
Thomas J Webster
Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
description Margaret R Park1, Michelle K Banks1, Bruce Applegate2, Thomas J Webster31School of Civil Engineering; 2Department of Food Science; 3School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USAAbstract: Surfaces with nanophase compared to conventional (or nanometer smooth) topographies are known to have different properties of area, charge, and reactivity. Previously published research indicates that the attachment of certain bacteria (such as Pseudomonas fluorescens 5RL) is higher on surfaces with nanophase compared to conventional topographies, however, their effect on bacterial metabolism is unclear. Results presented here show that the adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens 5RL and Pseudomonas putida TVA8 was higher on nanophase than conventional titania. Importantly, in terms of metabolism, bacteria attached to the nanophase surfaces had higher bioluminescence rates than on the conventional surfaces under all nutrient conditions. Thus, the results from this study show greater select bacterial metabolism on nanometer than conventional topographies, critical results with strong consequences for the design of improved biosensors for bacteria detection.Keywords: bacteria, attachment, nanophase, topography, metabolism
format article
author Margaret R Park
Michelle K Banks
Bruce Applegate
Thomas J Webster
author_facet Margaret R Park
Michelle K Banks
Bruce Applegate
Thomas J Webster
author_sort Margaret R Park
title Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
title_short Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
title_full Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
title_fullStr Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
title_full_unstemmed Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
title_sort influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/dd96875a91a04d739cc99ffb497c0438
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretrpark influenceofnanophasetitaniatopographyonbacterialattachmentandmetabolism
AT michellekbanks influenceofnanophasetitaniatopographyonbacterialattachmentandmetabolism
AT bruceapplegate influenceofnanophasetitaniatopographyonbacterialattachmentandmetabolism
AT thomasjwebster influenceofnanophasetitaniatopographyonbacterialattachmentandmetabolism
_version_ 1718401278616272896