Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma

Intraocular surgery is tabooed in retinoblastoma management, due to the concern of lethal extraocular spread. We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive children with intraocular retinoblastoma diagnosed at 29 Chinese centers between 2012–2014. We compared the outcomes of three categories of treatment:...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Junyang Zhao, Qiyan Li, Zhao Xun Feng, Jianping Zhang, Songyi Wu, Liwen Jin, Brenda L. Gallie
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ddaca98c64a8471b9061541506532582
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ddaca98c64a8471b9061541506532582
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ddaca98c64a8471b90615415065325822021-11-25T17:04:50ZTylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma10.3390/cancers132258622072-6694https://doaj.org/article/ddaca98c64a8471b90615415065325822021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/22/5862https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694Intraocular surgery is tabooed in retinoblastoma management, due to the concern of lethal extraocular spread. We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive children with intraocular retinoblastoma diagnosed at 29 Chinese centers between 2012–2014. We compared the outcomes of three categories of treatment: eye salvage including tylectomy (Group I), eye salvage without tylectomy (Group II), and primary enucleation (Group III). A total of 960 patients (1243 eyes) were diagnosed: 256 in Group I, 370 in Group II, and 293 in Group III; 41 patients abandoned treatment upfront. The estimated 5-year overall survivals (OS) were, for Group I, 94%, for Group II 89%, and for Group III 95%. The estimated 5-year disease-specific survivals (DSS) were, for Group I, 96%, for Group II 90%, and for Group III 95%. Patients in Group I had a significantly higher 5-year DSS than patients in Group II (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and not significantly different than patients in Group III (<i>p</i> = 0.367). Overall survival was not compromised by the inclusion of tylectomy in eye salvage therapy compared to eye salvage without tylectomy or primary enucleation. Disease-specific survival was better when tylectomy was included in eye salvage treatments. Tylectomy as part of multimodal treatment may contribute to the care of retinoblastoma patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumor, eyes with concomitant ocular complications, or at the risk of treatment abandonment.Junyang ZhaoQiyan LiZhao Xun FengJianping ZhangSongyi WuLiwen JinBrenda L. GallieMDPI AGarticleretinoblastomatylectomypars plana vitrectomysurgeryresectionendoresectionNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancers, Vol 13, Iss 5862, p 5862 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic retinoblastoma
tylectomy
pars plana vitrectomy
surgery
resection
endoresection
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle retinoblastoma
tylectomy
pars plana vitrectomy
surgery
resection
endoresection
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Junyang Zhao
Qiyan Li
Zhao Xun Feng
Jianping Zhang
Songyi Wu
Liwen Jin
Brenda L. Gallie
Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
description Intraocular surgery is tabooed in retinoblastoma management, due to the concern of lethal extraocular spread. We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive children with intraocular retinoblastoma diagnosed at 29 Chinese centers between 2012–2014. We compared the outcomes of three categories of treatment: eye salvage including tylectomy (Group I), eye salvage without tylectomy (Group II), and primary enucleation (Group III). A total of 960 patients (1243 eyes) were diagnosed: 256 in Group I, 370 in Group II, and 293 in Group III; 41 patients abandoned treatment upfront. The estimated 5-year overall survivals (OS) were, for Group I, 94%, for Group II 89%, and for Group III 95%. The estimated 5-year disease-specific survivals (DSS) were, for Group I, 96%, for Group II 90%, and for Group III 95%. Patients in Group I had a significantly higher 5-year DSS than patients in Group II (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and not significantly different than patients in Group III (<i>p</i> = 0.367). Overall survival was not compromised by the inclusion of tylectomy in eye salvage therapy compared to eye salvage without tylectomy or primary enucleation. Disease-specific survival was better when tylectomy was included in eye salvage treatments. Tylectomy as part of multimodal treatment may contribute to the care of retinoblastoma patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumor, eyes with concomitant ocular complications, or at the risk of treatment abandonment.
format article
author Junyang Zhao
Qiyan Li
Zhao Xun Feng
Jianping Zhang
Songyi Wu
Liwen Jin
Brenda L. Gallie
author_facet Junyang Zhao
Qiyan Li
Zhao Xun Feng
Jianping Zhang
Songyi Wu
Liwen Jin
Brenda L. Gallie
author_sort Junyang Zhao
title Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
title_short Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
title_full Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
title_fullStr Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma
title_sort tylectomy safety in salvage of eyes with retinoblastoma
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ddaca98c64a8471b9061541506532582
work_keys_str_mv AT junyangzhao tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT qiyanli tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT zhaoxunfeng tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT jianpingzhang tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT songyiwu tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT liwenjin tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
AT brendalgallie tylectomysafetyinsalvageofeyeswithretinoblastoma
_version_ 1718412745749037056