Panclavism as Panmongolism. Historiosophy of Nationalism
The article discusses the historiosophical journalism of V. S. Solovyov 1890’s. It is proved that V. S. Solovyov to the historical experience of the Asian states (China and Japan) was necessary in order to show the perniciousness of the policy of isolationism and the beneficence of the civilizationa...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ddae854cc6574847a03a918e05a90be1 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The article discusses the historiosophical journalism of V. S. Solovyov 1890’s. It is proved that V. S. Solovyov to the historical experience of the Asian states (China and Japan) was necessary in order to show the perniciousness of the policy of isolationism and the beneficence of the civilizational dialogue and the borrowing of the achievements of European culture. Historical examples served VS. Soloviev basis for historiosophical generalizations and criticism of the Slavophil philosophy of history, in particular, the concept of N.Ya. Danilevsky. A comparison of the views of V. S. Solovyov with the historical concept of his father S. M. Solovyov. It is shown that, in part, an assessment of the historical role of Asian peoples and the characteristics of the Slavophil movement V. S. Soloviev borrowed from his father. |
|---|