Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Research output provides an insight into the development of the scientific capability of a country. Budget allocation for research and development (R&D) is directly proportional to the research output of a country. While developed countries spend a significant percentage of their GDP...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Manthan Janodia, Aparna I. Narayan, Santhosh Krishnan Venkata, Bharti Chogtu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	F1000 Research Ltd 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ddafbf0b41b143569158341bb73ff5e4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ddafbf0b41b143569158341bb73ff5e4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ddafbf0b41b143569158341bb73ff5e42021-11-29T14:03:15ZPublication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]2046-140210.12688/f1000research.52286.1https://doaj.org/article/ddafbf0b41b143569158341bb73ff5e42021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://f1000research.com/articles/10-510/v1https://doaj.org/toc/2046-1402Background: Research output provides an insight into the development of the scientific capability of a country. Budget allocation for research and development (R&D) is directly proportional to the research output of a country. While developed countries spend a significant percentage of their GDP on R&D, developing countries do not have enough resources to invest in R&D. Countries in the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) Nations has received significantly less attention from outside the region in studying R&D and research publication scenario of the region. The research output of BIMSTEC countries was analyzed using various metrics in this paper. Methods: Data on citation per paper, Field Weight Citation Impact (FWCI), paper per researcher, collaborative publications, and output in top 10 percent journals was extracted from one of the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, Scopus and its affiliate SciVal, for a period of 6 years between 2012-2017. Percentage of R&D spend, researchers per million population, and total scientific output were extracted from World Bank data. Results: India and Thailand have a higher quantum of publications compared to other countries. Subjects like clinical, technology, Computer Science have a larger publication number as compared to other subject areas like Social Science, Arts, Education, Law, and Physiology. The researcher population and research spend of a nation have an evident implication on the publication though no direct relation can be derived. Conclusion: Huge disparities in terms of percentage of research spent, research output, papers per researcher, and output with national and international authorship differ for countries. Higher research spent and publication count are not positively correlated with better FWCI.Manthan JanodiaAparna I. NarayanSanthosh Krishnan VenkataBharti ChogtuF1000 Research LtdarticleMedicineRScienceQENF1000Research, Vol 10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Manthan Janodia Aparna I. Narayan Santhosh Krishnan Venkata Bharti Chogtu Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
description	Background: Research output provides an insight into the development of the scientific capability of a country. Budget allocation for research and development (R&D) is directly proportional to the research output of a country. While developed countries spend a significant percentage of their GDP on R&D, developing countries do not have enough resources to invest in R&D. Countries in the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) Nations has received significantly less attention from outside the region in studying R&D and research publication scenario of the region. The research output of BIMSTEC countries was analyzed using various metrics in this paper. Methods: Data on citation per paper, Field Weight Citation Impact (FWCI), paper per researcher, collaborative publications, and output in top 10 percent journals was extracted from one of the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, Scopus and its affiliate SciVal, for a period of 6 years between 2012-2017. Percentage of R&D spend, researchers per million population, and total scientific output were extracted from World Bank data. Results: India and Thailand have a higher quantum of publications compared to other countries. Subjects like clinical, technology, Computer Science have a larger publication number as compared to other subject areas like Social Science, Arts, Education, Law, and Physiology. The researcher population and research spend of a nation have an evident implication on the publication though no direct relation can be derived. Conclusion: Huge disparities in terms of percentage of research spent, research output, papers per researcher, and output with national and international authorship differ for countries. Higher research spent and publication count are not positively correlated with better FWCI.
format	article
author	Manthan Janodia Aparna I. Narayan Santhosh Krishnan Venkata Bharti Chogtu
author_facet	Manthan Janodia Aparna I. Narayan Santhosh Krishnan Venkata Bharti Chogtu
author_sort	Manthan Janodia
title	Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short	Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full	Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr	Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed	Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort	publication analysis in bay for bengal initiative for multi-sectoral technical and economic cooperation nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher	F1000 Research Ltd
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ddafbf0b41b143569158341bb73ff5e4
work_keys_str_mv	AT manthanjanodia publicationanalysisinbayforbengalinitiativeformultisectoraltechnicalandeconomiccooperationnationsversion1peerreview2approved AT aparnainarayan publicationanalysisinbayforbengalinitiativeformultisectoraltechnicalandeconomiccooperationnationsversion1peerreview2approved AT santhoshkrishnanvenkata publicationanalysisinbayforbengalinitiativeformultisectoraltechnicalandeconomiccooperationnationsversion1peerreview2approved AT bhartichogtu publicationanalysisinbayforbengalinitiativeformultisectoraltechnicalandeconomiccooperationnationsversion1peerreview2approved
_version_	1718407316472070144

Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Ejemplares similares