Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies

(1) Background: COVID-19 disruptions offer researchers insight into how pandemics are at once biological and social threats, as communities struggle to construct meaning from novel challenges to their ontological status quo. Multiple epistemes, in which public health imperatives confront and negotia...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopher B. Raymond, Paul R. Ward
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ddb678c2d4344303961378af3844c5c7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ddb678c2d4344303961378af3844c5c7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ddb678c2d4344303961378af3844c5c72021-11-25T17:50:55ZCommunity-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies10.3390/ijerph1822120631660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/ddb678c2d4344303961378af3844c5c72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12063https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601(1) Background: COVID-19 disruptions offer researchers insight into how pandemics are at once biological and social threats, as communities struggle to construct meaning from novel challenges to their ontological status quo. Multiple epistemes, in which public health imperatives confront and negotiate locally derived knowledge and traditions, vie for legitimacy and agency, resulting in new cultural forms. (2) Methods: To investigate the context and construction of community responses, a systematic review of qualitative literature was conducted with the aim of evaluating those insights provided by empirical, social field research in low- and middle-income countries since the onset of COVID-19. Six scholarly databases were searched for empirical, qualitative, field-based, or participatory research that was published in peer-reviewed journals between December 2019 and August 2021. (3) Results: Twenty-five studies were selected for data extraction, following critical appraisal for methodological rigor by two independent reviewers, and were then analyzed thematically. Faced with unprecedented social ruptures, restrictions in social and physical mobility, and ever-looming uncertainties of infection, financial insecurity, stigma, and loss, communities worldwide reacted in multiple and complex ways. Pervasive misinformation and fear of social rejection resulted in noncompliance with pandemic sanctions, resistance, and increased isolation, allowing the spread of the disease. The meaning of, and understandings about, COVID-19 were constructed using traditional, religious, and biomedical epistemologies, which were occasionally in conflict with each other. Innovations and adaptations, through syntheses of traditional and biomedical discourses and practice, illustrated community resilience and provided models for successful engagement to improve public health outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Local context and community engagement were indispensable considerations when enacting effective public health interventions to meet the challenges of the pandemic.Christopher B. RaymondPaul R. WardMDPI AGarticleCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2community ethnographypandemic social sciencequalitativeresilienceMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 12063, p 12063 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
community ethnography
pandemic social science
qualitative
resilience
Medicine
R
spellingShingle COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
community ethnography
pandemic social science
qualitative
resilience
Medicine
R
Christopher B. Raymond
Paul R. Ward
Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
description (1) Background: COVID-19 disruptions offer researchers insight into how pandemics are at once biological and social threats, as communities struggle to construct meaning from novel challenges to their ontological status quo. Multiple epistemes, in which public health imperatives confront and negotiate locally derived knowledge and traditions, vie for legitimacy and agency, resulting in new cultural forms. (2) Methods: To investigate the context and construction of community responses, a systematic review of qualitative literature was conducted with the aim of evaluating those insights provided by empirical, social field research in low- and middle-income countries since the onset of COVID-19. Six scholarly databases were searched for empirical, qualitative, field-based, or participatory research that was published in peer-reviewed journals between December 2019 and August 2021. (3) Results: Twenty-five studies were selected for data extraction, following critical appraisal for methodological rigor by two independent reviewers, and were then analyzed thematically. Faced with unprecedented social ruptures, restrictions in social and physical mobility, and ever-looming uncertainties of infection, financial insecurity, stigma, and loss, communities worldwide reacted in multiple and complex ways. Pervasive misinformation and fear of social rejection resulted in noncompliance with pandemic sanctions, resistance, and increased isolation, allowing the spread of the disease. The meaning of, and understandings about, COVID-19 were constructed using traditional, religious, and biomedical epistemologies, which were occasionally in conflict with each other. Innovations and adaptations, through syntheses of traditional and biomedical discourses and practice, illustrated community resilience and provided models for successful engagement to improve public health outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Local context and community engagement were indispensable considerations when enacting effective public health interventions to meet the challenges of the pandemic.
format article
author Christopher B. Raymond
Paul R. Ward
author_facet Christopher B. Raymond
Paul R. Ward
author_sort Christopher B. Raymond
title Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
title_short Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
title_full Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
title_fullStr Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
title_full_unstemmed Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies
title_sort community-level experiences, understandings, and responses to covid-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative and ethnographic studies
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ddb678c2d4344303961378af3844c5c7
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherbraymond communitylevelexperiencesunderstandingsandresponsestocovid19inlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeandethnographicstudies
AT paulrward communitylevelexperiencesunderstandingsandresponsestocovid19inlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeandethnographicstudies
_version_ 1718411953904287744