Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton

Abstract Background Plants respond to changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD) between the leaf and the atmosphere through changes in stomatal response, which can consequently affect transpiration, photosynthesis, and leaf-level water use efficiencies. With projected warmer air temperatures, changes...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Katrina J. BROUGHTON, Paxton PAYTON, Daniel K. Y. TAN, David T. TISSUE, Michael P. BANGE
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMC 2021
Materias:	Climate change Gossypium hirsutum Physiology VPD Plant culture SB1-1110
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ddbc23161a3d41e1bf600c4c030e8950
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ddbc23161a3d41e1bf600c4c030e8950
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ddbc23161a3d41e1bf600c4c030e89502021-11-21T12:14:19ZEffect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton10.1186/s42397-021-00105-42523-3254https://doaj.org/article/ddbc23161a3d41e1bf600c4c030e89502021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-021-00105-4https://doaj.org/toc/2523-3254Abstract Background Plants respond to changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD) between the leaf and the atmosphere through changes in stomatal response, which can consequently affect transpiration, photosynthesis, and leaf-level water use efficiencies. With projected warmer air temperatures, changes in rainfall distribution and altered VPD in future climates, it is important to understand the potential effect of VPD on leaf-level physiology of field-grown crops. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of altered VPD on leaf-level physiology of field-grown cotton to improve the current understanding of the plant-by-environment interaction, thereby contributing to validation and improvement of physiological and yield response models. Different VPD environments in the field were generated by planting cotton on three dates within the sowing window (early-season (S1) = 5th October 2011; mid-season (S2) = 9th November 2011; and late-season (S3) = 30th November 2011). VPD was also modified by altering crop irrigations. Results VPDL accounted for the largest proportion of the explained variation in both stomatal conductance (32%∼39%) and photosynthetic (16%∼29%) responses of cotton. Generally, smaller percentages of variation were attributed to other main factors such as the individual plant (Plant), and accumulated temperature stress hours (ASH; a measure of plant water status over time) and interactive factors, including leaf vapour pressure deficit (VPDL) × Plant and Plant × ASH; however, a proportion of variation was unexplained. In addition, the A sat/E (instantaneous transpiration efficiency, ITE) model developed based on cotton grown in the glasshouse was applied to cotton grown in the field. We found that the modelled A sat/E and field-measured A sat/E were very similar, suggesting that the mechanistic basis for ITE was similar in both environments. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of accounting for VPD in climate change research, given that stomata are highly responsive to changes in VPD. This experiment provides a basis for physiology and production models, particularly in terms of cotton response to projected climatic environments.Katrina J. BROUGHTONPaxton PAYTONDaniel K. Y. TANDavid T. TISSUEMichael P. BANGEBMCarticleClimate changeGossypium hirsutumPhysiologyVPDPlant cultureSB1-1110ENJournal of Cotton Research, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Climate change Gossypium hirsutum Physiology VPD Plant culture SB1-1110
spellingShingle	Climate change Gossypium hirsutum Physiology VPD Plant culture SB1-1110 Katrina J. BROUGHTON Paxton PAYTON Daniel K. Y. TAN David T. TISSUE Michael P. BANGE Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
description	Abstract Background Plants respond to changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD) between the leaf and the atmosphere through changes in stomatal response, which can consequently affect transpiration, photosynthesis, and leaf-level water use efficiencies. With projected warmer air temperatures, changes in rainfall distribution and altered VPD in future climates, it is important to understand the potential effect of VPD on leaf-level physiology of field-grown crops. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of altered VPD on leaf-level physiology of field-grown cotton to improve the current understanding of the plant-by-environment interaction, thereby contributing to validation and improvement of physiological and yield response models. Different VPD environments in the field were generated by planting cotton on three dates within the sowing window (early-season (S1) = 5th October 2011; mid-season (S2) = 9th November 2011; and late-season (S3) = 30th November 2011). VPD was also modified by altering crop irrigations. Results VPDL accounted for the largest proportion of the explained variation in both stomatal conductance (32%∼39%) and photosynthetic (16%∼29%) responses of cotton. Generally, smaller percentages of variation were attributed to other main factors such as the individual plant (Plant), and accumulated temperature stress hours (ASH; a measure of plant water status over time) and interactive factors, including leaf vapour pressure deficit (VPDL) × Plant and Plant × ASH; however, a proportion of variation was unexplained. In addition, the A sat/E (instantaneous transpiration efficiency, ITE) model developed based on cotton grown in the glasshouse was applied to cotton grown in the field. We found that the modelled A sat/E and field-measured A sat/E were very similar, suggesting that the mechanistic basis for ITE was similar in both environments. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of accounting for VPD in climate change research, given that stomata are highly responsive to changes in VPD. This experiment provides a basis for physiology and production models, particularly in terms of cotton response to projected climatic environments.
format	article
author	Katrina J. BROUGHTON Paxton PAYTON Daniel K. Y. TAN David T. TISSUE Michael P. BANGE
author_facet	Katrina J. BROUGHTON Paxton PAYTON Daniel K. Y. TAN David T. TISSUE Michael P. BANGE
author_sort	Katrina J. BROUGHTON
title	Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
title_short	Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
title_full	Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
title_fullStr	Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
title_full_unstemmed	Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
title_sort	effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton
publisher	BMC
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ddbc23161a3d41e1bf600c4c030e8950
work_keys_str_mv	AT katrinajbroughton effectofvapourpressuredeficitongasexchangeoffieldgrowncotton AT paxtonpayton effectofvapourpressuredeficitongasexchangeoffieldgrowncotton AT danielkytan effectofvapourpressuredeficitongasexchangeoffieldgrowncotton AT davidttissue effectofvapourpressuredeficitongasexchangeoffieldgrowncotton AT michaelpbange effectofvapourpressuredeficitongasexchangeoffieldgrowncotton
_version_	1718419155810516992

Effect of vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of field-grown cotton

Ejemplares similares