A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More than 30% of deliveries are carried out by cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia is the routine and safe method but, in some situations, general anesthesia is selected instead. One complication in general anesthesia for cesarean is intraoperative awareness which sometimes...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SM Rabiee, E Alijanpour, F Naziri, H Alreza, V Esmaeili
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ddc2b2580dc44f2db63becba06bfb9aa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ddc2b2580dc44f2db63becba06bfb9aa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ddc2b2580dc44f2db63becba06bfb9aa2021-11-10T08:53:26ZA Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/ddc2b2580dc44f2db63becba06bfb9aa2012-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-4186-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More than 30% of deliveries are carried out by cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia is the routine and safe method but, in some situations, general anesthesia is selected instead. One complication in general anesthesia for cesarean is intraoperative awareness which sometimes can lead to disabling psychological sequela. This study is designed to compare sodium thiopental and propofol as induction agents in depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic variations in mothers and APGAR score of neonates. METHODS: This double blind clinical trial was conducted on 50 full term parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. They were randomly assigned into sodium thiopental (n=25) and propofol (n=25) groups. All patients received intravenous midazolam 1.5mg and lidocaine 1mg/kg. General anesthesia was induced for the first group by sodium thiopental (5mg/kg) and the second group by propofol (2.5mg/kg) and all patients then received succinylcholine (1.5mg/kg) as muscle relaxant for facilitation of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% O2 -50% N2O and 0.6% Isoflurane. Maternal BIS values (Bispecral Index System) and hemodynamic variables and also APGAR score of neonates were evaluated and recorded. FINDINGS: BIS values in different times, was similar and less than 60 (p=0.637). Maternal mean arterial pressure (p=0.630) and heart rate (p=0.623) and neonatal APGAR score in first minute (p=0.105) and fifth minute (p=0.185) were not significantly different.CONCLUSION: The effect of sodium thiopental and propofol on depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic variables of mothers as well as neonatal APGAR scores was similar and propofol can be used as an appropriate alternative for sodium thiopental in induction of anesthesia for cesarean section.SM Rabiee,E AlijanpourF NaziriH AlrezaV EsmaeiliBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlecesarean sectiondepth of anesthesiahemodynamic variablessodium thiopentalpropofolMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 7-12 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic cesarean section
depth of anesthesia
hemodynamic variables
sodium thiopental
propofol
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle cesarean section
depth of anesthesia
hemodynamic variables
sodium thiopental
propofol
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
SM Rabiee,
E Alijanpour
F Naziri
H Alreza
V Esmaeili
A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More than 30% of deliveries are carried out by cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia is the routine and safe method but, in some situations, general anesthesia is selected instead. One complication in general anesthesia for cesarean is intraoperative awareness which sometimes can lead to disabling psychological sequela. This study is designed to compare sodium thiopental and propofol as induction agents in depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic variations in mothers and APGAR score of neonates. METHODS: This double blind clinical trial was conducted on 50 full term parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. They were randomly assigned into sodium thiopental (n=25) and propofol (n=25) groups. All patients received intravenous midazolam 1.5mg and lidocaine 1mg/kg. General anesthesia was induced for the first group by sodium thiopental (5mg/kg) and the second group by propofol (2.5mg/kg) and all patients then received succinylcholine (1.5mg/kg) as muscle relaxant for facilitation of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% O2 -50% N2O and 0.6% Isoflurane. Maternal BIS values (Bispecral Index System) and hemodynamic variables and also APGAR score of neonates were evaluated and recorded. FINDINGS: BIS values in different times, was similar and less than 60 (p=0.637). Maternal mean arterial pressure (p=0.630) and heart rate (p=0.623) and neonatal APGAR score in first minute (p=0.105) and fifth minute (p=0.185) were not significantly different.CONCLUSION: The effect of sodium thiopental and propofol on depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic variables of mothers as well as neonatal APGAR scores was similar and propofol can be used as an appropriate alternative for sodium thiopental in induction of anesthesia for cesarean section.
format article
author SM Rabiee,
E Alijanpour
F Naziri
H Alreza
V Esmaeili
author_facet SM Rabiee,
E Alijanpour
F Naziri
H Alreza
V Esmaeili
author_sort SM Rabiee,
title A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
title_short A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
title_full A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
title_fullStr A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Depth of Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Variables with Sodium Thiopental and Propofol as Induction Agents for Cesarean Section
title_sort comparison of depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic variables with sodium thiopental and propofol as induction agents for cesarean section
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/ddc2b2580dc44f2db63becba06bfb9aa
work_keys_str_mv AT smrabiee acomparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT ealijanpour acomparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT fnaziri acomparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT halreza acomparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT vesmaeili acomparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT smrabiee comparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT ealijanpour comparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT fnaziri comparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT halreza comparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
AT vesmaeili comparisonofdepthofanesthesiaandhemodynamicvariableswithsodiumthiopentalandpropofolasinductionagentsforcesareansection
_version_ 1718440422398754816