Pensar el mundo y actuar en el mundo. Del mal radical a la banalidad del mal en el pensamiento de Hannah Arendt

These pages prove how A Raport on the Banality of Evil forces Arendt to re-think the category of Radical Evil, in which she had based The Origins of Totalitarism. She now has to use a new interpretative criteria, based on the idea of the Banality of Evil, in which the author of a series of criminal...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stefania Fantauzzi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CA
EN
ES
EU
FR
GL
IT
PT
Publicado: Universitat de Barcelona 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ddf7329947b1404c81ec47e2df87f00e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:These pages prove how A Raport on the Banality of Evil forces Arendt to re-think the category of Radical Evil, in which she had based The Origins of Totalitarism. She now has to use a new interpretative criteria, based on the idea of the Banality of Evil, in which the author of a series of criminal acts is not a monster but a person unable to think. The notion of the Banality of Evil rises some discussion around the meaning of conscience, and the will that this meets in the responsibility of the individual, the tool to understand and fight Evil. These questions end up converging in the analysis of a basic moral issue, the judgment, which opens new perspectives on The Life of the Mind.