Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis

Background: Dental implants have an important role in mainstream dental practice today to restore esthetics. The present study was conducted to evaluate the microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis. Materials and Methods: The present study co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Soni Kumari, Manish Shivaji Jadhav, Vishal Gupta, Tarun Koshy Isaac, Angel Subramanium, Vinit Kumar
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	microleakage zinc oxide noneugenol cement zinc polycarboxylate cement Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ddff447270c74ce483077ef7788ba37f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ddff447270c74ce483077ef7788ba37f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ddff447270c74ce483077ef7788ba37f2021-11-19T12:15:53ZMicroleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_405_21https://doaj.org/article/ddff447270c74ce483077ef7788ba37f2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1679;epage=1681;aulast=https://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Dental implants have an important role in mainstream dental practice today to restore esthetics. The present study was conducted to evaluate the microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis. Materials and Methods: The present study comprised sixty replicas of abutment analog with length 5 mm, width of platform 4.8 mm, and taper 6° which were milled and divided into three groups. In Group I, nickel–chromium copings were fabricated; marginal gap was evaluated with optical microscope and luted with zinc oxide noneugenol cement, Group II with zinc polycarboxylate cement, and Group III with zinc phosphate cement. Microleakage was scored by the method used by Tjan et al. Results: The mean microleakage score in Group I was 2.5, in Group II was 1.9, and in Group III was 1.05. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All cements showed microleakage. Minimum microleakage was seen with zinc phosphate cement than zinc oxide noneugenol cement and zinc polycarboxylate cement.Soni KumariManish Shivaji JadhavVishal GuptaTarun Koshy IsaacAngel SubramaniumVinit KumarWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlemicroleakagezinc oxide noneugenol cementzinc polycarboxylate cementPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1679-1681 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	microleakage zinc oxide noneugenol cement zinc polycarboxylate cement Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	microleakage zinc oxide noneugenol cement zinc polycarboxylate cement Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Soni Kumari Manish Shivaji Jadhav Vishal Gupta Tarun Koshy Isaac Angel Subramanium Vinit Kumar Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
description	Background: Dental implants have an important role in mainstream dental practice today to restore esthetics. The present study was conducted to evaluate the microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis. Materials and Methods: The present study comprised sixty replicas of abutment analog with length 5 mm, width of platform 4.8 mm, and taper 6° which were milled and divided into three groups. In Group I, nickel–chromium copings were fabricated; marginal gap was evaluated with optical microscope and luted with zinc oxide noneugenol cement, Group II with zinc polycarboxylate cement, and Group III with zinc phosphate cement. Microleakage was scored by the method used by Tjan et al. Results: The mean microleakage score in Group I was 2.5, in Group II was 1.9, and in Group III was 1.05. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All cements showed microleakage. Minimum microleakage was seen with zinc phosphate cement than zinc oxide noneugenol cement and zinc polycarboxylate cement.
format	article
author	Soni Kumari Manish Shivaji Jadhav Vishal Gupta Tarun Koshy Isaac Angel Subramanium Vinit Kumar
author_facet	Soni Kumari Manish Shivaji Jadhav Vishal Gupta Tarun Koshy Isaac Angel Subramanium Vinit Kumar
author_sort	Soni Kumari
title	Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
title_short	Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
title_full	Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
title_fullStr	Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed	Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
title_sort	microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ddff447270c74ce483077ef7788ba37f
work_keys_str_mv	AT sonikumari microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT manishshivajijadhav microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT vishalgupta microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT tarunkoshyisaac microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT angelsubramanium microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT vinitkumar microleakageatimplantabutmentandprosthesisinterfaceincementedimplantsupportedprosthesis
_version_	1718420162873393152

Microleakage at implant abutment and prosthesis interface in cemented implant-supported prosthesis

Ejemplares similares