Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad52021-12-01T10:05:38ZScientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry1831-473210.2903/j.efsa.2011.2426https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad52011-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2426https://doaj.org/toc/1831-4732Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The proposed method consists in a decomposition of the carcasses by a process of autolysis, putrefaction and finally digestion by insects that takes place on‐farm in a proofed pit. The carcasses are taken daily from a warehouse and immediately thrown into the pit. Lime is added at the rate of 200g/kg of carcass. Loading continues until the pit is full. The end‐product obtained is intended to be used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the identification and characterisation of the risk material was not properly addressed in the application and a comprehensive list of possible hazards was not provided. No experimental validation with representative test‐organisms under practical conditions was done. Because of a lack of information in the report, it was not possible to determine the degree of risk reduction of pathogenic bacterial, viral and parasitological agents achieved by the processes. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation.EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)WileyarticleAnimal By‐Productsalternative methodsequivalenceon‐site treatmentdead poultryNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Chemical technologyTP1-1185ENEFSA Journal, Vol 9, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2011) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Animal By‐Products alternative methods equivalence on‐site treatment dead poultry Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Chemical technology TP1-1185 |
spellingShingle |
Animal By‐Products alternative methods equivalence on‐site treatment dead poultry Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Chemical technology TP1-1185 EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
description |
Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The proposed method consists in a decomposition of the carcasses by a process of autolysis, putrefaction and finally digestion by insects that takes place on‐farm in a proofed pit. The carcasses are taken daily from a warehouse and immediately thrown into the pit. Lime is added at the rate of 200g/kg of carcass. Loading continues until the pit is full. The end‐product obtained is intended to be used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the identification and characterisation of the risk material was not properly addressed in the application and a comprehensive list of possible hazards was not provided. No experimental validation with representative test‐organisms under practical conditions was done. Because of a lack of information in the report, it was not possible to determine the degree of risk reduction of pathogenic bacterial, viral and parasitological agents achieved by the processes. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation. |
format |
article |
author |
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) |
author_facet |
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) |
author_sort |
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) |
title |
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
title_short |
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
title_full |
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
title_fullStr |
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
title_sort |
scientific opinion on isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT efsapanelonbiologicalhazardsbiohaz scientificopiniononisolationinproofedpitonfarmofdeadpoultry |
_version_ |
1718405326903967744 |