Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry

Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad52021-12-01T10:05:38ZScientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry1831-473210.2903/j.efsa.2011.2426https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad52011-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2426https://doaj.org/toc/1831-4732Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The proposed method consists in a decomposition of the carcasses by a process of autolysis, putrefaction and finally digestion by insects that takes place on‐farm in a proofed pit. The carcasses are taken daily from a warehouse and immediately thrown into the pit. Lime is added at the rate of 200g/kg of carcass. Loading continues until the pit is full. The end‐product obtained is intended to be used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the identification and characterisation of the risk material was not properly addressed in the application and a comprehensive list of possible hazards was not provided. No experimental validation with representative test‐organisms under practical conditions was done. Because of a lack of information in the report, it was not possible to determine the degree of risk reduction of pathogenic bacterial, viral and parasitological agents achieved by the processes. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation.EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)WileyarticleAnimal By‐Productsalternative methodsequivalenceon‐site treatmentdead poultryNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Chemical technologyTP1-1185ENEFSA Journal, Vol 9, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Animal By‐Products
alternative methods
equivalence
on‐site treatment
dead poultry
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle Animal By‐Products
alternative methods
equivalence
on‐site treatment
dead poultry
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
description Abstract EFSA's Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By‐Products (ABP) as defined in Reg. (EC) 1069/2009. The material to be treated consists of dead‐on‐farm poultry; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The proposed method consists in a decomposition of the carcasses by a process of autolysis, putrefaction and finally digestion by insects that takes place on‐farm in a proofed pit. The carcasses are taken daily from a warehouse and immediately thrown into the pit. Lime is added at the rate of 200g/kg of carcass. Loading continues until the pit is full. The end‐product obtained is intended to be used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the identification and characterisation of the risk material was not properly addressed in the application and a comprehensive list of possible hazards was not provided. No experimental validation with representative test‐organisms under practical conditions was done. Because of a lack of information in the report, it was not possible to determine the degree of risk reduction of pathogenic bacterial, viral and parasitological agents achieved by the processes. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation.
format article
author EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
author_facet EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
title Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
title_short Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
title_full Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
title_sort scientific opinion on isolation in proofed pit on‐farm of dead poultry
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/de0bdd98913e4250baee351dd1203ad5
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonbiologicalhazardsbiohaz scientificopiniononisolationinproofedpitonfarmofdeadpoultry
_version_ 1718405326903967744