Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability

<p>Despite efforts to decrease the discrepancy between simulated and observed terrestrial carbon fluxes, the uncertainty in trends and patterns of the land carbon fluxes remains high. This difficulty raises the question of the extent to which the terrestrial carbon cycle is predictable and whi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: I. Dunkl, A. Spring, P. Friedlingstein, V. Brovkin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Copernicus Publications 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/de1beddd5c0543c4b5e9539e53daa249
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:de1beddd5c0543c4b5e9539e53daa249
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:de1beddd5c0543c4b5e9539e53daa2492021-12-02T08:27:26ZProcess-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability10.5194/esd-12-1413-20212190-49792190-4987https://doaj.org/article/de1beddd5c0543c4b5e9539e53daa2492021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://esd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1413/2021/esd-12-1413-2021.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2190-4979https://doaj.org/toc/2190-4987<p>Despite efforts to decrease the discrepancy between simulated and observed terrestrial carbon fluxes, the uncertainty in trends and patterns of the land carbon fluxes remains high. This difficulty raises the question of the extent to which the terrestrial carbon cycle is predictable and which processes explain the predictability. Here, the perfect model approach is used to assess the potential predictability of net primary production (NPPpred) and heterotrophic respiration (Rhpred) by using ensemble simulations conducted with the Max Planck Institute Earth system model. In order to assess the role of local carbon flux predictability (CFpred) in the predictability of the global carbon cycle, we suggest a new predictability metric weighted by the amplitude of the flux anomalies. Regression analysis is used to determine the contribution of the predictability of different environmental drivers to NPPpred and Rhpred (soil moisture, air temperature, and radiation for NPP, and soil organic carbon, air temperature, and precipitation for Rh). Global NPPpred is driven to 62 % and 30 % by the predictability of soil moisture and temperature, respectively. Global Rhpred is driven to 52 % and 27 % by the predictability of soil organic carbon and temperature, respectively. The decomposition of predictability shows that the relatively high Rhpred compared to NPPpred is due to the generally high predictability of soil organic carbon. The seasonality in NPPpred and Rhpred patterns can be explained by the change in limiting factors over the wet and dry months. Consequently, CFpred is controlled by the predictability of the currently limiting environmental factor. Differences in CFpred between ensemble simulations can be attributed to the occurrence of wet and dry years, which influences the predictability of soil moisture and temperature. This variability of predictability is caused by the state dependency of ecosystem processes. Our results reveal the crucial regions and ecosystem processes to be considered when initializing a carbon prediction system.</p>I. DunklI. DunklA. SpringP. FriedlingsteinV. BrovkinV. BrovkinCopernicus PublicationsarticleScienceQGeologyQE1-996.5Dynamic and structural geologyQE500-639.5ENEarth System Dynamics, Vol 12, Pp 1413-1426 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Science
Q
Geology
QE1-996.5
Dynamic and structural geology
QE500-639.5
spellingShingle Science
Q
Geology
QE1-996.5
Dynamic and structural geology
QE500-639.5
I. Dunkl
I. Dunkl
A. Spring
P. Friedlingstein
V. Brovkin
V. Brovkin
Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
description <p>Despite efforts to decrease the discrepancy between simulated and observed terrestrial carbon fluxes, the uncertainty in trends and patterns of the land carbon fluxes remains high. This difficulty raises the question of the extent to which the terrestrial carbon cycle is predictable and which processes explain the predictability. Here, the perfect model approach is used to assess the potential predictability of net primary production (NPPpred) and heterotrophic respiration (Rhpred) by using ensemble simulations conducted with the Max Planck Institute Earth system model. In order to assess the role of local carbon flux predictability (CFpred) in the predictability of the global carbon cycle, we suggest a new predictability metric weighted by the amplitude of the flux anomalies. Regression analysis is used to determine the contribution of the predictability of different environmental drivers to NPPpred and Rhpred (soil moisture, air temperature, and radiation for NPP, and soil organic carbon, air temperature, and precipitation for Rh). Global NPPpred is driven to 62 % and 30 % by the predictability of soil moisture and temperature, respectively. Global Rhpred is driven to 52 % and 27 % by the predictability of soil organic carbon and temperature, respectively. The decomposition of predictability shows that the relatively high Rhpred compared to NPPpred is due to the generally high predictability of soil organic carbon. The seasonality in NPPpred and Rhpred patterns can be explained by the change in limiting factors over the wet and dry months. Consequently, CFpred is controlled by the predictability of the currently limiting environmental factor. Differences in CFpred between ensemble simulations can be attributed to the occurrence of wet and dry years, which influences the predictability of soil moisture and temperature. This variability of predictability is caused by the state dependency of ecosystem processes. Our results reveal the crucial regions and ecosystem processes to be considered when initializing a carbon prediction system.</p>
format article
author I. Dunkl
I. Dunkl
A. Spring
P. Friedlingstein
V. Brovkin
V. Brovkin
author_facet I. Dunkl
I. Dunkl
A. Spring
P. Friedlingstein
V. Brovkin
V. Brovkin
author_sort I. Dunkl
title Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
title_short Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
title_full Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
title_fullStr Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
title_full_unstemmed Process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
title_sort process-based analysis of terrestrial carbon flux predictability
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/de1beddd5c0543c4b5e9539e53daa249
work_keys_str_mv AT idunkl processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
AT idunkl processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
AT aspring processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
AT pfriedlingstein processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
AT vbrovkin processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
AT vbrovkin processbasedanalysisofterrestrialcarbonfluxpredictability
_version_ 1718398513818107904