Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study

Aim. To compare efficiency, safety, and cost of different treatment modalities. Materials and methods. The study included 40 patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, foot and lower leg trophic ulcers at granulation stage I-II (Wagners classification)free from wound infection. The patients were randomi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko, Evgenia Viktorovna Bublik
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Endocrinology Research Centre 2009
Materias:	trophic ulcers diabetes mellitus dressing materials Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases RC620-627
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/de2bbee1489148e28ecf6ef44076e4ac
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:de2bbee1489148e28ecf6ef44076e4ac
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:de2bbee1489148e28ecf6ef44076e4ac2021-11-14T09:00:13ZUse of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study2072-03512072-037810.14341/2072-0351-5414https://doaj.org/article/de2bbee1489148e28ecf6ef44076e4ac2009-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dia-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/5414https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0351https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0378Aim. To compare efficiency, safety, and cost of different treatment modalities. Materials and methods. The study included 40 patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, foot and lower leg trophic ulcers at granulation stage I-II (Wagners classification)free from wound infection. The patients were randomized for the treatment during 2 months with a Biatain dressing (Coloplast, Denmark)(group1) and for conventional treatment with the use of an atraumatic mesh dressing (group 2). Biatain dressings were changed every 2-4 (up to 5) daysand conventional dressings once daily. Patients in the two groups were adjusted for age, sex, ulcer type, size and duration, length of antibiotic therapy beforeand during treatment, blood glucose level, and other characteristics (p>0.05). Results. Ulcers healed within 2 months in 70% of the patients in group 1 and in 53.3% in group 2 (insignificant difference, p = 0.48). Other efficiency (medianhealing time, survival curves) and safety parameters were not significantly different either. The cost of treatment by the two methods was comparabledespite a higher cost of Biatain dressings due to their rarer change and economy of material for secondary dressing. When dressings were changed by medicalprofessionals rather than by the patient or his (her) relatives at home, treatment with the use of Biatain dressings proved 1.75 times cheaper. Conclusion. Efficiency and safety of high-tech and conventional dressing materials is comparable. The real difference between the costs of treatment byeither method is significantly smaller than the difference between retail prices of the two materials. Cost effectiveness of high-tech dressings is higher if thetreatment is accomplished in a medical facility.Oleg Viktorovich UdovichenkoEvgenia Viktorovna BublikEndocrinology Research Centrearticletrophic ulcersdiabetes mellitusdressing materialsNutritional diseases. Deficiency diseasesRC620-627ENRUСахарный диабет, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 18-21 (2009)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	trophic ulcers diabetes mellitus dressing materials Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases RC620-627
spellingShingle	trophic ulcers diabetes mellitus dressing materials Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases RC620-627 Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko Evgenia Viktorovna Bublik Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
description	Aim. To compare efficiency, safety, and cost of different treatment modalities. Materials and methods. The study included 40 patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, foot and lower leg trophic ulcers at granulation stage I-II (Wagners classification)free from wound infection. The patients were randomized for the treatment during 2 months with a Biatain dressing (Coloplast, Denmark)(group1) and for conventional treatment with the use of an atraumatic mesh dressing (group 2). Biatain dressings were changed every 2-4 (up to 5) daysand conventional dressings once daily. Patients in the two groups were adjusted for age, sex, ulcer type, size and duration, length of antibiotic therapy beforeand during treatment, blood glucose level, and other characteristics (p>0.05). Results. Ulcers healed within 2 months in 70% of the patients in group 1 and in 53.3% in group 2 (insignificant difference, p = 0.48). Other efficiency (medianhealing time, survival curves) and safety parameters were not significantly different either. The cost of treatment by the two methods was comparabledespite a higher cost of Biatain dressings due to their rarer change and economy of material for secondary dressing. When dressings were changed by medicalprofessionals rather than by the patient or his (her) relatives at home, treatment with the use of Biatain dressings proved 1.75 times cheaper. Conclusion. Efficiency and safety of high-tech and conventional dressing materials is comparable. The real difference between the costs of treatment byeither method is significantly smaller than the difference between retail prices of the two materials. Cost effectiveness of high-tech dressings is higher if thetreatment is accomplished in a medical facility.
format	article
author	Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko Evgenia Viktorovna Bublik
author_facet	Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko Evgenia Viktorovna Bublik
author_sort	Oleg Viktorovich Udovichenko
title	Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
title_short	Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
title_full	Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
title_fullStr	Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
title_full_unstemmed	Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
title_sort	use of biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study
publisher	Endocrinology Research Centre
publishDate	2009
url	https://doaj.org/article/de2bbee1489148e28ecf6ef44076e4ac
work_keys_str_mv	AT olegviktorovichudovichenko useofbiataindressingmaterialinpatientswithdiabeticfootsyndromerandomizedcomparativestudy AT evgeniaviktorovnabublik useofbiataindressingmaterialinpatientswithdiabeticfootsyndromerandomizedcomparativestudy
_version_	1718429683439108096

Use of Biatain dressing material in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: randomized comparative study

Ejemplares similares