Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML

Abstract Background Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanize...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonia Jaramillo, Johannes Krisam, Lucian Le Cornet, Markus Kratzmann, Lukas Baumann, Tim Sauer, Martina Crysandt, Andreas Rank, Dirk Behringer, Lino Teichmann, Martin Görner, Ralf-Ulrich Trappe, Christoph Röllig, Stefan Krause, Maher Hanoun, Olaf Hopfer, Gerhard Held, Sebastian Buske, Lars Fransecky, Sabine Kayser, Christoph Schliemann, Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart, Yousef Al-Fareh, Jörg Schubert, Thomas Geer, Martin Kaufmann, Arne Brecht, Dirk Niemann, Meinhard Kieser, Martin Bornhäuser, Uwe Platzbecker, Hubert Serve, Claudia D. Baldus, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Richard F. Schlenk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/de39e7989b1540d2a1eb5143a0cffc57
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:de39e7989b1540d2a1eb5143a0cffc57
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:de39e7989b1540d2a1eb5143a0cffc572021-11-08T11:03:15ZRationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w1745-6215https://doaj.org/article/de39e7989b1540d2a1eb5143a0cffc572021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05703-whttps://doaj.org/toc/1745-6215Abstract Background Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial. Methods/Design This is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4, and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7 + 3 schedule with cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 days 1, 2, and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1 g/m2, bi-daily, days 1, 2, and 3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings. Trial status Protocol version: 1st version 20.10.2020, no amendments yet. Study initiation on February 16, 2021. First patient was recruited on April 1st. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04093505 ; EudraCT 2019-003913-32. Registered on October 30, 2018.Sonia JaramilloJohannes KrisamLucian Le CornetMarkus KratzmannLukas BaumannTim SauerMartina CrysandtAndreas RankDirk BehringerLino TeichmannMartin GörnerRalf-Ulrich TrappeChristoph RölligStefan KrauseMaher HanounOlaf HopferGerhard HeldSebastian BuskeLars FranseckySabine KayserChristoph SchliemannKerstin Schaefer-EckartYousef Al-FarehJörg SchubertThomas GeerMartin KaufmannArne BrechtDirk NiemannMeinhard KieserMartin BornhäuserUwe PlatzbeckerHubert ServeClaudia D. BaldusCarsten Müller-TidowRichard F. SchlenkBMCarticlegemtuzumab ozogamicinglasdegibacute myeloid leukemiameasurable residual diseaseMedicine (General)R5-920ENTrials, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gemtuzumab ozogamicin
glasdegib
acute myeloid leukemia
measurable residual disease
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle gemtuzumab ozogamicin
glasdegib
acute myeloid leukemia
measurable residual disease
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Sonia Jaramillo
Johannes Krisam
Lucian Le Cornet
Markus Kratzmann
Lukas Baumann
Tim Sauer
Martina Crysandt
Andreas Rank
Dirk Behringer
Lino Teichmann
Martin Görner
Ralf-Ulrich Trappe
Christoph Röllig
Stefan Krause
Maher Hanoun
Olaf Hopfer
Gerhard Held
Sebastian Buske
Lars Fransecky
Sabine Kayser
Christoph Schliemann
Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart
Yousef Al-Fareh
Jörg Schubert
Thomas Geer
Martin Kaufmann
Arne Brecht
Dirk Niemann
Meinhard Kieser
Martin Bornhäuser
Uwe Platzbecker
Hubert Serve
Claudia D. Baldus
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Richard F. Schlenk
Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
description Abstract Background Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial. Methods/Design This is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4, and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7 + 3 schedule with cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 days 1, 2, and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1 g/m2, bi-daily, days 1, 2, and 3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings. Trial status Protocol version: 1st version 20.10.2020, no amendments yet. Study initiation on February 16, 2021. First patient was recruited on April 1st. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04093505 ; EudraCT 2019-003913-32. Registered on October 30, 2018.
format article
author Sonia Jaramillo
Johannes Krisam
Lucian Le Cornet
Markus Kratzmann
Lukas Baumann
Tim Sauer
Martina Crysandt
Andreas Rank
Dirk Behringer
Lino Teichmann
Martin Görner
Ralf-Ulrich Trappe
Christoph Röllig
Stefan Krause
Maher Hanoun
Olaf Hopfer
Gerhard Held
Sebastian Buske
Lars Fransecky
Sabine Kayser
Christoph Schliemann
Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart
Yousef Al-Fareh
Jörg Schubert
Thomas Geer
Martin Kaufmann
Arne Brecht
Dirk Niemann
Meinhard Kieser
Martin Bornhäuser
Uwe Platzbecker
Hubert Serve
Claudia D. Baldus
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Richard F. Schlenk
author_facet Sonia Jaramillo
Johannes Krisam
Lucian Le Cornet
Markus Kratzmann
Lukas Baumann
Tim Sauer
Martina Crysandt
Andreas Rank
Dirk Behringer
Lino Teichmann
Martin Görner
Ralf-Ulrich Trappe
Christoph Röllig
Stefan Krause
Maher Hanoun
Olaf Hopfer
Gerhard Held
Sebastian Buske
Lars Fransecky
Sabine Kayser
Christoph Schliemann
Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart
Yousef Al-Fareh
Jörg Schubert
Thomas Geer
Martin Kaufmann
Arne Brecht
Dirk Niemann
Meinhard Kieser
Martin Bornhäuser
Uwe Platzbecker
Hubert Serve
Claudia D. Baldus
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Richard F. Schlenk
author_sort Sonia Jaramillo
title Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
title_short Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
title_full Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
title_sort rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design gng-trial: a randomized phase-iii study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed aml
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/de39e7989b1540d2a1eb5143a0cffc57
work_keys_str_mv AT soniajaramillo rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT johanneskrisam rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT lucianlecornet rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT markuskratzmann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT lukasbaumann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT timsauer rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT martinacrysandt rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT andreasrank rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT dirkbehringer rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT linoteichmann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT martingorner rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT ralfulrichtrappe rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT christophrollig rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT stefankrause rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT maherhanoun rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT olafhopfer rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT gerhardheld rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT sebastianbuske rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT larsfransecky rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT sabinekayser rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT christophschliemann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT kerstinschaefereckart rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT yousefalfareh rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT jorgschubert rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT thomasgeer rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT martinkaufmann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT arnebrecht rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT dirkniemann rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT meinhardkieser rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT martinbornhauser rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT uweplatzbecker rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT hubertserve rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT claudiadbaldus rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT carstenmullertidow rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
AT richardfschlenk rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi
_version_ 1718442477932773376