Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Yale University
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe22021-12-01T10:47:58ZUnhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-21/imoon2058-5462https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://britishartstudies.ac.uk/issues/issue-index/issue-21/redefining-the-british-decorative-artshttps://doaj.org/toc/2058-5462This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has long been associated with the British decorative arts, proposing instead a move of defamiliarization and making strange the routines of domesticity that seem self-evident and simply “the way things always have been”. Iris MoonYale Universityarticledecorative artsFine ArtsNArts in generalNX1-820ENBritish Art Studies, Iss 21 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
decorative arts Fine Arts N Arts in general NX1-820 |
spellingShingle |
decorative arts Fine Arts N Arts in general NX1-820 Iris Moon Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
description |
This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has long been associated with the British decorative arts, proposing instead a move of defamiliarization and making strange the routines of domesticity that seem self-evident and simply “the way things always have been”. |
format |
article |
author |
Iris Moon |
author_facet |
Iris Moon |
author_sort |
Iris Moon |
title |
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
title_short |
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
title_full |
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
title_fullStr |
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts |
title_sort |
unhomely: redefining the british decorative arts |
publisher |
Yale University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT irismoon unhomelyredefiningthebritishdecorativearts |
_version_ |
1718405264696147968 |