Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts

This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Iris Moon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Yale University 2021
Materias:
N
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe22021-12-01T10:47:58ZUnhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-21/imoon2058-5462https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://britishartstudies.ac.uk/issues/issue-index/issue-21/redefining-the-british-decorative-artshttps://doaj.org/toc/2058-5462This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has long been associated with the British decorative arts, proposing instead a move of defamiliarization and making strange the routines of domesticity that seem self-evident and simply “the way things always have been”. Iris MoonYale Universityarticledecorative artsFine ArtsNArts in generalNX1-820ENBritish Art Studies, Iss 21 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic decorative arts
Fine Arts
N
Arts in general
NX1-820
spellingShingle decorative arts
Fine Arts
N
Arts in general
NX1-820
Iris Moon
Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
description This issue proposes a double move to readers. First, it foregrounds the fact that slavery, colonialism, and empire were integral historical components in the production, consumption, and reception of the British decorative arts. Second, it suggests that readers unhinge the “heritage” aspect that has long been associated with the British decorative arts, proposing instead a move of defamiliarization and making strange the routines of domesticity that seem self-evident and simply “the way things always have been”.
format article
author Iris Moon
author_facet Iris Moon
author_sort Iris Moon
title Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
title_short Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
title_full Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
title_fullStr Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
title_full_unstemmed Unhomely: Redefining the British Decorative Arts
title_sort unhomely: redefining the british decorative arts
publisher Yale University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/deff4376bde04da68f0d0eea2f9bdbe2
work_keys_str_mv AT irismoon unhomelyredefiningthebritishdecorativearts
_version_ 1718405264696147968