Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds

The sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with cost-efficient and ever-advancing sequencing technology is propelling changes in biodiversity monitoring within aquatic ecosystems. Despite the increasing number of eDNA metabarcoding approaches, the ability to quantify species bi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristina Di Muri, Lori Lawson Handley, Colin W. Bean, Jianlong Li, Graeme Peirson, Graham S. Sellers, Kerry Walsh, Hayley V. Watson, Ian J. Winfield, Bernd Hänfling
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/df05e8017adb497c88475145e0eb8d94
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:df05e8017adb497c88475145e0eb8d94
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:df05e8017adb497c88475145e0eb8d942021-12-02T11:04:30ZRead counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds10.3897/mbmg.4.569592534-9708https://doaj.org/article/df05e8017adb497c88475145e0eb8d942020-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/56959/download/pdf/https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/56959/download/xml/https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/56959/https://doaj.org/toc/2534-9708 The sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with cost-efficient and ever-advancing sequencing technology is propelling changes in biodiversity monitoring within aquatic ecosystems. Despite the increasing number of eDNA metabarcoding approaches, the ability to quantify species biomass and abundance in natural systems is still not fully understood. Previous studies have shown positive but sometimes weak correlations between abundance estimates from eDNA metabarcoding data and from conventional capture methods. As both methods have independent biases a lack of concordance is difficult to interpret. Here we tested whether read counts from eDNA metabarcoding provide accurate quantitative estimates of the absolute abundance of fish in holding ponds with known fish biomass and number of individuals. Environmental DNA samples were collected from two fishery ponds with high fish density and broad species diversity. In one pond, two different DNA capture strategies (on-site filtration with enclosed filters and three different preservation buffers versus lab filtration using open filters) were used to evaluate their performance in relation to fish community composition and biomass/abundance estimates. Fish species read counts were significantly correlated with both biomass and abundance, and this result, together with information on fish diversity, was repeatable when open or enclosed filters with different preservation buffers were used. This research demonstrates that eDNA metabarcoding provides accurate qualitative and quantitative information on fish communities in small ponds, and results are consistent between different methods of DNA capture. This method flexibility will be beneficial for future eDNA-based fish monitoring and their integration into fisheries management. Cristina Di MuriLori Lawson HandleyColin W. BeanJianlong LiGraeme PeirsonGraham S. SellersKerry WalshHayley V. WatsonIan J. WinfieldBernd HänflingPensoft PublishersarticleEcologyQH540-549.5ENMetabarcoding and Metagenomics, Vol 4, Iss , Pp 97-112 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecology
QH540-549.5
Cristina Di Muri
Lori Lawson Handley
Colin W. Bean
Jianlong Li
Graeme Peirson
Graham S. Sellers
Kerry Walsh
Hayley V. Watson
Ian J. Winfield
Bernd Hänfling
Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
description The sampling of environmental DNA (eDNA) coupled with cost-efficient and ever-advancing sequencing technology is propelling changes in biodiversity monitoring within aquatic ecosystems. Despite the increasing number of eDNA metabarcoding approaches, the ability to quantify species biomass and abundance in natural systems is still not fully understood. Previous studies have shown positive but sometimes weak correlations between abundance estimates from eDNA metabarcoding data and from conventional capture methods. As both methods have independent biases a lack of concordance is difficult to interpret. Here we tested whether read counts from eDNA metabarcoding provide accurate quantitative estimates of the absolute abundance of fish in holding ponds with known fish biomass and number of individuals. Environmental DNA samples were collected from two fishery ponds with high fish density and broad species diversity. In one pond, two different DNA capture strategies (on-site filtration with enclosed filters and three different preservation buffers versus lab filtration using open filters) were used to evaluate their performance in relation to fish community composition and biomass/abundance estimates. Fish species read counts were significantly correlated with both biomass and abundance, and this result, together with information on fish diversity, was repeatable when open or enclosed filters with different preservation buffers were used. This research demonstrates that eDNA metabarcoding provides accurate qualitative and quantitative information on fish communities in small ponds, and results are consistent between different methods of DNA capture. This method flexibility will be beneficial for future eDNA-based fish monitoring and their integration into fisheries management.
format article
author Cristina Di Muri
Lori Lawson Handley
Colin W. Bean
Jianlong Li
Graeme Peirson
Graham S. Sellers
Kerry Walsh
Hayley V. Watson
Ian J. Winfield
Bernd Hänfling
author_facet Cristina Di Muri
Lori Lawson Handley
Colin W. Bean
Jianlong Li
Graeme Peirson
Graham S. Sellers
Kerry Walsh
Hayley V. Watson
Ian J. Winfield
Bernd Hänfling
author_sort Cristina Di Muri
title Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
title_short Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
title_full Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
title_fullStr Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
title_full_unstemmed Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
title_sort read counts from environmental dna (edna) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/df05e8017adb497c88475145e0eb8d94
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinadimuri readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT lorilawsonhandley readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT colinwbean readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT jianlongli readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT graemepeirson readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT grahamssellers readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT kerrywalsh readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT hayleyvwatson readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT ianjwinfield readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
AT berndhanfling readcountsfromenvironmentaldnaednametabarcodingreflectfishabundanceandbiomassindrainedponds
_version_ 1718396323046096896