Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals

Abstract Dysphagia is frequent in many neurological diseases and gives rise to severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia is essential and can reduce mortality. This study investigated the effect of cognitiv...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul Muhle, Inga Claus, Bendix Labeit, Mao Ogawa, Rainer Dziewas, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, Tobias Warnecke
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/df062f5a46f44bc3a160c742d810a19e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:df062f5a46f44bc3a160c742d810a19e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:df062f5a46f44bc3a160c742d810a19e2021-12-02T15:10:19ZEffects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals10.1038/s41598-020-77421-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/df062f5a46f44bc3a160c742d810a19e2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77421-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Dysphagia is frequent in many neurological diseases and gives rise to severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia is essential and can reduce mortality. This study investigated the effect of cognitive and motor dual-task interference on swallowing in healthy participants, as dual-task effects are reported for other motor tasks such as gait and speech. 27 participants (17 females; 29.2 ± 4.1 years) were included in this prospective study and examined using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Using a previously established FEES-based score, the paradigms “baseline swallowing”, “cognitive dual-task” and “motor dual-task” were assessed. Scores of the three paradigms were compared using a repetitive measures ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. Mean baseline swallowing score in single task was 5 ± 3. It worsened to 6 ± 5 in the cognitive (p = 0.118), and to 8 ± 5 in the motor dual-task condition (p < 0.001). This change was driven by subclinical worsening of premature bolus spillage and pharyngeal residue. Oropharyngeal swallowing is not exclusively reflexive in nature but requires attention, which leads to motor dual-task interference. This has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications, e.g. in the early screening for dysphagia or in avoiding dual-task situations while eating.Paul MuhleInga ClausBendix LabeitMao OgawaRainer DziewasSonja Suntrup-KruegerTobias WarneckeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Paul Muhle
Inga Claus
Bendix Labeit
Mao Ogawa
Rainer Dziewas
Sonja Suntrup-Krueger
Tobias Warnecke
Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
description Abstract Dysphagia is frequent in many neurological diseases and gives rise to severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia is essential and can reduce mortality. This study investigated the effect of cognitive and motor dual-task interference on swallowing in healthy participants, as dual-task effects are reported for other motor tasks such as gait and speech. 27 participants (17 females; 29.2 ± 4.1 years) were included in this prospective study and examined using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Using a previously established FEES-based score, the paradigms “baseline swallowing”, “cognitive dual-task” and “motor dual-task” were assessed. Scores of the three paradigms were compared using a repetitive measures ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. Mean baseline swallowing score in single task was 5 ± 3. It worsened to 6 ± 5 in the cognitive (p = 0.118), and to 8 ± 5 in the motor dual-task condition (p < 0.001). This change was driven by subclinical worsening of premature bolus spillage and pharyngeal residue. Oropharyngeal swallowing is not exclusively reflexive in nature but requires attention, which leads to motor dual-task interference. This has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications, e.g. in the early screening for dysphagia or in avoiding dual-task situations while eating.
format article
author Paul Muhle
Inga Claus
Bendix Labeit
Mao Ogawa
Rainer Dziewas
Sonja Suntrup-Krueger
Tobias Warnecke
author_facet Paul Muhle
Inga Claus
Bendix Labeit
Mao Ogawa
Rainer Dziewas
Sonja Suntrup-Krueger
Tobias Warnecke
author_sort Paul Muhle
title Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
title_short Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
title_full Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
title_fullStr Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
title_full_unstemmed Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals
title_sort effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with fees in healthy individuals
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/df062f5a46f44bc3a160c742d810a19e
work_keys_str_mv AT paulmuhle effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT ingaclaus effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT bendixlabeit effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT maoogawa effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT rainerdziewas effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT sonjasuntrupkrueger effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
AT tobiaswarnecke effectsofcognitiveandmotordualtasksonoropharyngealswallowingassessedwithfeesinhealthyindividuals
_version_ 1718387724096897024