Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach

Objective: The present study assessed the safety and benefits of laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy compared to laparoscopic or laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective comparative study. A total of 277 patients underwent adenomyomectomy between January 2...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun Woo Ahn, Seul-Gi You, Eun Byeol Go, Sang Hun Lee, Jeong Sook Kim, Hyun Jin Cho, Hyun Jin Roh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/df310772246d4bb8b16d9c67ff718132
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:df310772246d4bb8b16d9c67ff718132
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:df310772246d4bb8b16d9c67ff7181322021-11-18T04:44:40ZMinimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach1028-455910.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.010https://doaj.org/article/df310772246d4bb8b16d9c67ff7181322021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455921002503https://doaj.org/toc/1028-4559Objective: The present study assessed the safety and benefits of laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy compared to laparoscopic or laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective comparative study. A total of 277 patients underwent adenomyomectomy between January 2016 and January 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulsan University Hospital, including 25 with laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy, 82 with laparoscopic adenomyomectomy, and 170 with laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy consisted of a laparoscopic uterine artery procedure to reduce blood loss and a minimal incisional for laparotomic adenomyomectomy. An additional laparoscopic surgery was performed for possible pelvic pathology. Results: Data on patient demographics, surgical indications, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), short-term complications, and postoperative hospital stays were compared. The laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) and laparotomic groups were comparable in average EBL (208.0 ± 128.8 vs. 193.6 ± 193.0 ml, p = 0.11), weight of removed mass (85.5 ± 71.7 vs. 108.2 ± 91.9 g, p = 0.39), and postoperative hospital days (HDs) (4.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.27). These values were lower in the laparoscopic group (EBL 119.5 ± 79.6 ml, mass weight 39.3 ± 25.9 g, HD 3.6 ± 0.8 days). Additional procedures, including myomectomy and combined severe endometriosis surgery, were more frequently performed in the LAS group than the laparotomic group. The mean operating time was longer in the LAS group (179.8 ± 36.6 min) than the other groups (laparoscopy 99.9 ± 40.6 min, p < 0.00; laparotomy 133.0 ± 41.1 min, p < 0.00). The three groups did not differ significantly in transfusion rates, hemoglobin changes, or perioperative complications. However, febrile morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic group than the LAS and laparotomic groups. Conclusion: LAS adenomyomectomy allows for maximal debulking of adenomyosis via extracorporeal and intracorporeal procedures while retaining the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Additional pelvic surgery for benign uterine and adnexal pathology may easily be performed with this approach.Jun Woo AhnSeul-Gi YouEun Byeol GoSang Hun LeeJeong Sook KimHyun Jin ChoHyun Jin RohElsevierarticleAdenomyosisLaparoscopic-assisted surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryGynecology and obstetricsRG1-991ENTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 60, Iss 6, Pp 1005-1010 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Adenomyosis
Laparoscopic-assisted surgery
Minimally invasive surgery
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
spellingShingle Adenomyosis
Laparoscopic-assisted surgery
Minimally invasive surgery
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
Jun Woo Ahn
Seul-Gi You
Eun Byeol Go
Sang Hun Lee
Jeong Sook Kim
Hyun Jin Cho
Hyun Jin Roh
Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
description Objective: The present study assessed the safety and benefits of laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy compared to laparoscopic or laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective comparative study. A total of 277 patients underwent adenomyomectomy between January 2016 and January 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulsan University Hospital, including 25 with laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy, 82 with laparoscopic adenomyomectomy, and 170 with laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy consisted of a laparoscopic uterine artery procedure to reduce blood loss and a minimal incisional for laparotomic adenomyomectomy. An additional laparoscopic surgery was performed for possible pelvic pathology. Results: Data on patient demographics, surgical indications, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), short-term complications, and postoperative hospital stays were compared. The laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) and laparotomic groups were comparable in average EBL (208.0 ± 128.8 vs. 193.6 ± 193.0 ml, p = 0.11), weight of removed mass (85.5 ± 71.7 vs. 108.2 ± 91.9 g, p = 0.39), and postoperative hospital days (HDs) (4.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.27). These values were lower in the laparoscopic group (EBL 119.5 ± 79.6 ml, mass weight 39.3 ± 25.9 g, HD 3.6 ± 0.8 days). Additional procedures, including myomectomy and combined severe endometriosis surgery, were more frequently performed in the LAS group than the laparotomic group. The mean operating time was longer in the LAS group (179.8 ± 36.6 min) than the other groups (laparoscopy 99.9 ± 40.6 min, p < 0.00; laparotomy 133.0 ± 41.1 min, p < 0.00). The three groups did not differ significantly in transfusion rates, hemoglobin changes, or perioperative complications. However, febrile morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic group than the LAS and laparotomic groups. Conclusion: LAS adenomyomectomy allows for maximal debulking of adenomyosis via extracorporeal and intracorporeal procedures while retaining the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Additional pelvic surgery for benign uterine and adnexal pathology may easily be performed with this approach.
format article
author Jun Woo Ahn
Seul-Gi You
Eun Byeol Go
Sang Hun Lee
Jeong Sook Kim
Hyun Jin Cho
Hyun Jin Roh
author_facet Jun Woo Ahn
Seul-Gi You
Eun Byeol Go
Sang Hun Lee
Jeong Sook Kim
Hyun Jin Cho
Hyun Jin Roh
author_sort Jun Woo Ahn
title Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
title_short Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
title_full Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
title_fullStr Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
title_sort minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/df310772246d4bb8b16d9c67ff718132
work_keys_str_mv AT junwooahn minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT seulgiyou minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT eunbyeolgo minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT sanghunlee minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT jeongsookkim minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT hyunjincho minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
AT hyunjinroh minimallyinvasiveadenomyomectomyviaalaparoscopicassistedapproachcomparedtoalaparoscopicorlaparotomicapproach
_version_ 1718425132208226304