Rationality as the Normative Dimension of Speech Acts
My paper deals with Searle’s account of the normative dimension involved in the performance of speech acts. I will first critically assess the rule-based speech act theory behind Searle’s characterization of the normativity of language – arguing that this approach cannot explain what makes a certai...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | EN FR IT |
| Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/df4bd20c1eed4f3bae30bcd94a708bac |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | My paper deals with Searle’s account of the normative dimension involved in the performance of speech acts. I will first critically assess the rule-based speech act theory behind Searle’s characterization of the normativity of language – arguing that this approach cannot explain what makes a certain illocutionary act the specific type of illocutionary act it is, both in literal and non-literal or indirect cases. As an alternative, I will endorse the inferentialist model of linguistic communication proposed by Bach and Harnish. Besides a benefit on the side of speech act theory, the inferentialist model – along with some suggestions offered by Grice’s later reflections about rationality – can adequately account for the normative dimension arising from language. In particular, it enables to do so by emphasizing an aspect pointed out by Searle himself: the social character of the communication situation. I will claim that the presumption about the interlocutor’s rationality could be regarded as the basic form of normativity deriving from the social character of the communication situation.
|
|---|