The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse
In the scientific literature concepts such concepts as “demand for insurance”, “demand for insurance services”, “insurance demand”, “demand for insurance products”, etc. are often used. While being simple in their intuitive reading, they are in fact not as unambiguous as they may seem at first glanc...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | RU |
| Publicado: |
Publishing House of the State University of Management
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/df597f85ef274f53a823de90cae7eebf |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:df597f85ef274f53a823de90cae7eebf |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:df597f85ef274f53a823de90cae7eebf2021-12-03T07:43:37ZThe concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse1816-42772686-841510.26425/1816-4277-2021-9-136-144https://doaj.org/article/df597f85ef274f53a823de90cae7eebf2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/3102https://doaj.org/toc/1816-4277https://doaj.org/toc/2686-8415In the scientific literature concepts such concepts as “demand for insurance”, “demand for insurance services”, “insurance demand”, “demand for insurance products”, etc. are often used. While being simple in their intuitive reading, they are in fact not as unambiguous as they may seem at first glance. Since there is a semantic conditionality of the meaning of a derived word by the values of its components and they are also not always well-established, then terminological uncertainty arises. The negative effect is enhanced by the permissible mixing of concepts with each other or the creation of scholastic multivariability. Quite often, the definition of demand as a category is given a characteristic of the level of demand, and without taking into account its dimension and type. Moreover, there are defects in the choice of definitions and the construction of definitions, the dominance of recursive definitions that have no value for the full disclosure of the meaning and content of the defined. The author concludes about the inadmissibility of taking liberties in the interpretation of significant concepts and terms, careful construction of new turns with their participation. The problem of using concepts without giving meaning to their scientific content is posed.М. N. StepanovaPublishing House of the State University of Managementarticledemand for insuranceinsurance demandinsurance marketinsurance serviceinsurance recipientinsurancedemand levelinsurance marketingSociology (General)HM401-1281Economics as a scienceHB71-74RUВестник университета, Vol 0, Iss 9, Pp 136-144 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
RU |
| topic |
demand for insurance insurance demand insurance market insurance service insurance recipient insurance demand level insurance marketing Sociology (General) HM401-1281 Economics as a science HB71-74 |
| spellingShingle |
demand for insurance insurance demand insurance market insurance service insurance recipient insurance demand level insurance marketing Sociology (General) HM401-1281 Economics as a science HB71-74 М. N. Stepanova The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| description |
In the scientific literature concepts such concepts as “demand for insurance”, “demand for insurance services”, “insurance demand”, “demand for insurance products”, etc. are often used. While being simple in their intuitive reading, they are in fact not as unambiguous as they may seem at first glance. Since there is a semantic conditionality of the meaning of a derived word by the values of its components and they are also not always well-established, then terminological uncertainty arises. The negative effect is enhanced by the permissible mixing of concepts with each other or the creation of scholastic multivariability. Quite often, the definition of demand as a category is given a characteristic of the level of demand, and without taking into account its dimension and type. Moreover, there are defects in the choice of definitions and the construction of definitions, the dominance of recursive definitions that have no value for the full disclosure of the meaning and content of the defined. The author concludes about the inadmissibility of taking liberties in the interpretation of significant concepts and terms, careful construction of new turns with their participation. The problem of using concepts without giving meaning to their scientific content is posed. |
| format |
article |
| author |
М. N. Stepanova |
| author_facet |
М. N. Stepanova |
| author_sort |
М. N. Stepanova |
| title |
The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| title_short |
The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| title_full |
The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| title_fullStr |
The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| title_sort |
concept of “demand” and its derivatives in the modern scientific insurance discourse |
| publisher |
Publishing House of the State University of Management |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/df597f85ef274f53a823de90cae7eebf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mnstepanova theconceptofdemandanditsderivativesinthemodernscientificinsurancediscourse AT mnstepanova conceptofdemandanditsderivativesinthemodernscientificinsurancediscourse |
| _version_ |
1718373422585610240 |