Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.

<h4>Objective</h4>To validate the colposcopy indication proposed by the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests (the 2019 ASCCP guidelines).<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical data of 1404 patients who underwent colposcopy in si...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ting Gui, Zhiyan Chen, Fei Chen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/df8831697a1a4078a5f0f46ca6d6ce3a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:df8831697a1a4078a5f0f46ca6d6ce3a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:df8831697a1a4078a5f0f46ca6d6ce3a2021-12-02T20:09:49ZValidation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253493https://doaj.org/article/df8831697a1a4078a5f0f46ca6d6ce3a2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253493https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>To validate the colposcopy indication proposed by the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests (the 2019 ASCCP guidelines).<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical data of 1404 patients who underwent colposcopy in single center in China were reviewed. Based on history and current cervical screening (HPV & cytology), corresponding recommendations were given according to the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The agreement and discrepancy of colposcopy indication were analyzed between the Chinese consensus and the 2019 ASCCP guidelines.<h4>Results</h4>Colposcopy indication was matched in about 80% patients. The left 20% were recommended with follow-up by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The discrepancy mainly focused on patients having a current result of HPV-positive NILM without unknown history. The ratio of observed CIN3+ in our database over estimated CIN3+ by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines was 6.2 (31/5). The ratio was even higher in patients with HPV16/18-positive NILM (7, 28/4), compared with those with other types of high-risk HPV-positive NILM (3, 3/1). The 2019 ASCCP guidelines had a relatively high sensitivity (83.1%), a low specificity (21.5%), a low positive predictive value (14.1%) and a high negative predictive value (89.1%) for prediction of CIN 3+.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We could try to apply the 2019 ASCCP guidelines in Chinese population. The classification of HR-HPV was strongly recommended during risk assessment. For patients with HPV16/18 infection, colposcopy should be recommended. Perspective multi-center randomized controlled trial with reliable follow-up should be performed in the future to confirm the feasibility.Ting GuiZhiyan ChenFei ChenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0253493 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ting Gui
Zhiyan Chen
Fei Chen
Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
description <h4>Objective</h4>To validate the colposcopy indication proposed by the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests (the 2019 ASCCP guidelines).<h4>Methods</h4>Clinical data of 1404 patients who underwent colposcopy in single center in China were reviewed. Based on history and current cervical screening (HPV & cytology), corresponding recommendations were given according to the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The agreement and discrepancy of colposcopy indication were analyzed between the Chinese consensus and the 2019 ASCCP guidelines.<h4>Results</h4>Colposcopy indication was matched in about 80% patients. The left 20% were recommended with follow-up by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines. The discrepancy mainly focused on patients having a current result of HPV-positive NILM without unknown history. The ratio of observed CIN3+ in our database over estimated CIN3+ by the 2019 ASCCP guidelines was 6.2 (31/5). The ratio was even higher in patients with HPV16/18-positive NILM (7, 28/4), compared with those with other types of high-risk HPV-positive NILM (3, 3/1). The 2019 ASCCP guidelines had a relatively high sensitivity (83.1%), a low specificity (21.5%), a low positive predictive value (14.1%) and a high negative predictive value (89.1%) for prediction of CIN 3+.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We could try to apply the 2019 ASCCP guidelines in Chinese population. The classification of HR-HPV was strongly recommended during risk assessment. For patients with HPV16/18 infection, colposcopy should be recommended. Perspective multi-center randomized controlled trial with reliable follow-up should be performed in the future to confirm the feasibility.
format article
author Ting Gui
Zhiyan Chen
Fei Chen
author_facet Ting Gui
Zhiyan Chen
Fei Chen
author_sort Ting Gui
title Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
title_short Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
title_full Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
title_fullStr Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines: A single-center study in China.
title_sort validation of the indication for colposcopy proposed by the 2019 asccp risk-based management consensus guidelines: a single-center study in china.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/df8831697a1a4078a5f0f46ca6d6ce3a
work_keys_str_mv AT tinggui validationoftheindicationforcolposcopyproposedbythe2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesasinglecenterstudyinchina
AT zhiyanchen validationoftheindicationforcolposcopyproposedbythe2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesasinglecenterstudyinchina
AT feichen validationoftheindicationforcolposcopyproposedbythe2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesasinglecenterstudyinchina
_version_ 1718375094281043968