Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function
Divya Narayanan,1 Garrick Wallstrom,2 John Rodriguez,1 Donna Welch,1 Matthew Chapin,1 Paul Arrigg,3,4 Rajkumar Patil,1 Mark Abelson1,4,5 1Ora, Inc, Andover, MA, USA; 2Statistics and Data Corporation, Tempe, AZ, USA; 3Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA; 4Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Bo...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/df969b0080f244d7a543fcf7382c4f18 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Divya Narayanan,1 Garrick Wallstrom,2 John Rodriguez,1 Donna Welch,1 Matthew Chapin,1 Paul Arrigg,3,4 Rajkumar Patil,1 Mark Abelson1,4,5 1Ora, Inc, Andover, MA, USA; 2Statistics and Data Corporation, Tempe, AZ, USA; 3Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA; 4Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 5Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Divya NarayananOra, Inc., 300 Brickstone Square, Andover, MA 01810, USATel +1 978-685-8900Fax +1 978-689-0020Email dnarayanan@oraclinical.comPurpose: Early detection and treatment of age-related macular degeneration require a clear understanding of the early progress of the disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether minimal macular ophthalmoscopic changes corresponded to changes in visual function.Methods: Color macular photos from a group of older subjects who were classified as grade 0 on AREDS simplified grading were further evaluated by a retinal specialist using 5x magnification for possible minimal macular anomalies. Group 0-A (N = 15) were defined as subjects with no visible macular anomalies while Group 0-B (N = 19) comprised subjects for whom minimal macular mottling, pigment changes or very small drusen (< 63 μm) were observed in the study eye. All subjects had best VA of 20/25 or better and had no evidence of other retinal diseases in the study eye. All subjects underwent a series of visual function tests such as standard ETDRS VA, low luminance ETDRS VA, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, variable contrast flicker (VCF) sensitivity, and reading speed (words per minute, wpm) using both MNRead and low luminance reading on a tablet.Results: There was no significant difference between the mean age between the two groups (74.8 ± 5.2 years for 0-A vs 74.5 ± 4.4 for 0-B, p = 0.82). None of the visual function tests identified any significant difference between the two groups. Mean ETDRS VA was 0.0 ± 0.11 for 0-A subjects and 0.08 ± 0.12 for 0-B (p = 0.063). Mean Pelli-Robson log contrast sensitivity was 1.75 ± 0.29 for 0-A and 1.78 ± 0.17 for the 0-B group (p = 0.73). VCF threshold was 0.47 ± 0.25 for 0-A and 0.43 ± 0.22 for 0-B (p = 0.64). Reading speed using MNRead was 214 ± 47.4 wpm for 0-A and 210 ± 64.7 for 0-B (p = 0.85). Low luminance tablet reading speed was 137 ± 71.8 wpm for 0-A and 151 ± 39.4 (0-B) (p = 0.49).Conclusion: A panel of psychophysical tests did not demonstrate significant differences between subjects with and without minimal macular changes.Keywords: macula, visual function, AMD |
|---|