Managing the risks of missing international climate targets

The Paris targets are based on assumptions that a global temperature increase of 1.5 °C−2 °C above preindustrial levels will be safe, and that the climate can be stabilized at these higher temperatures. However, global average temperatures are already measurably impacting the Earth’s systems at 1.2 ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Graeme Taylor, Sue Vink
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Climate risk management Paris agreement Overshoot Tipping points Climate interventions Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/df9f8a6e374e4ec58691840a403f045c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:df9f8a6e374e4ec58691840a403f045c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:df9f8a6e374e4ec58691840a403f045c2021-12-04T04:33:56ZManaging the risks of missing international climate targets2212-096310.1016/j.crm.2021.100379https://doaj.org/article/df9f8a6e374e4ec58691840a403f045c2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209632100108Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2212-0963The Paris targets are based on assumptions that a global temperature increase of 1.5 °C−2 °C above preindustrial levels will be safe, and that the climate can be stabilized at these higher temperatures. However, global average temperatures are already measurably impacting the Earth’s systems at 1.2 °C above preindustrial levels. Many human and environmental systems cannot adapt to higher temperatures, which may exceed critical tipping points in physical climate and ecological systems.Compounding these risks is the likelihood that the international 2 °C limit will be overshot due to political obstacles and systemic inertia from existing greenhouse gases, warming oceans, and the decades required to replace existing infrastructure. Moreover, the Earth energy imbalance may have to be reduced to approximately zero to stabilize the global climate (i.e., CO2 concentrations lowered to around 350 ppm.)Most IPCC mitigation scenarios assume that climate targets will be temporarily overshot, and require large-scale carbon dioxide removal [CDR] to subsequently lower temperatures. However, many CDR methods may not be politically and/or technologically feasible, and they will act too slowly to prevent dangerous overshoot.These issues raise serious doubts about the ability of current mitigation polices to ensure safe outcomes. They also indicate the need to investigate whether rapid climate cooling measures may be required to reduce the risks associated with high temperatures during the long time it will take to decarbonize the global economy and stabilize the climate.Given the uncertainty of future mitigation success, and the potentially existential costs of failure, there is now an urgent need to examine whether or not current efforts are credible, and if not, what mitigation measures will be required to prevent dangerous overshoot and ensure a safe, stable climate.In order to develop a feasible mitigation strategy, it will be necessary to prioritize research both on climate overshoot risks, and on the relative effectiveness, risks, costs and timelines of potential mitigation and adaptation approaches. Since large scale climate interventions will be needed to prevent dangerous global warming, all plausible options need to be investigated, including carbon dioxide removal methods and technologies for rapidly cooling global temperatures. This research is a prerequisite for evaluating the comparative benefits, costs and risks of using, or not using, various forms of mitigation and adaptation, and then developing a realistic overshoot risk management plan.Graeme TaylorSue VinkElsevierarticleClimate risk managementParis agreementOvershootTipping pointsClimate interventionsMeteorology. ClimatologyQC851-999ENClimate Risk Management, Vol 34, Iss , Pp 100379- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Climate risk management Paris agreement Overshoot Tipping points Climate interventions Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999
spellingShingle	Climate risk management Paris agreement Overshoot Tipping points Climate interventions Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 Graeme Taylor Sue Vink Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
description	The Paris targets are based on assumptions that a global temperature increase of 1.5 °C−2 °C above preindustrial levels will be safe, and that the climate can be stabilized at these higher temperatures. However, global average temperatures are already measurably impacting the Earth’s systems at 1.2 °C above preindustrial levels. Many human and environmental systems cannot adapt to higher temperatures, which may exceed critical tipping points in physical climate and ecological systems.Compounding these risks is the likelihood that the international 2 °C limit will be overshot due to political obstacles and systemic inertia from existing greenhouse gases, warming oceans, and the decades required to replace existing infrastructure. Moreover, the Earth energy imbalance may have to be reduced to approximately zero to stabilize the global climate (i.e., CO2 concentrations lowered to around 350 ppm.)Most IPCC mitigation scenarios assume that climate targets will be temporarily overshot, and require large-scale carbon dioxide removal [CDR] to subsequently lower temperatures. However, many CDR methods may not be politically and/or technologically feasible, and they will act too slowly to prevent dangerous overshoot.These issues raise serious doubts about the ability of current mitigation polices to ensure safe outcomes. They also indicate the need to investigate whether rapid climate cooling measures may be required to reduce the risks associated with high temperatures during the long time it will take to decarbonize the global economy and stabilize the climate.Given the uncertainty of future mitigation success, and the potentially existential costs of failure, there is now an urgent need to examine whether or not current efforts are credible, and if not, what mitigation measures will be required to prevent dangerous overshoot and ensure a safe, stable climate.In order to develop a feasible mitigation strategy, it will be necessary to prioritize research both on climate overshoot risks, and on the relative effectiveness, risks, costs and timelines of potential mitigation and adaptation approaches. Since large scale climate interventions will be needed to prevent dangerous global warming, all plausible options need to be investigated, including carbon dioxide removal methods and technologies for rapidly cooling global temperatures. This research is a prerequisite for evaluating the comparative benefits, costs and risks of using, or not using, various forms of mitigation and adaptation, and then developing a realistic overshoot risk management plan.
format	article
author	Graeme Taylor Sue Vink
author_facet	Graeme Taylor Sue Vink
author_sort	Graeme Taylor
title	Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
title_short	Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
title_full	Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
title_fullStr	Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
title_full_unstemmed	Managing the risks of missing international climate targets
title_sort	managing the risks of missing international climate targets
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/df9f8a6e374e4ec58691840a403f045c
work_keys_str_mv	AT graemetaylor managingtherisksofmissinginternationalclimatetargets AT suevink managingtherisksofmissinginternationalclimatetargets
_version_	1718373000062959616

Managing the risks of missing international climate targets

Ejemplares similares