Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.

Although accelerometers are extensively used for assessing gait, limited research has evaluated the concurrent validity of these devices on less predictable walking surfaces or the comparability of different methods used for gravitational acceleration compensation. This study evaluated the concurren...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael H Cole, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Justin K Kavanagh, Steven Morrison, Paul W Hodges, James E Smeathers, Graham K Kerr
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dfb013b818b4419c8dfe2dea655c5929
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dfb013b818b4419c8dfe2dea655c5929
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dfb013b818b4419c8dfe2dea655c59292021-11-18T08:18:05ZConcurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0098395https://doaj.org/article/dfb013b818b4419c8dfe2dea655c59292014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24866262/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Although accelerometers are extensively used for assessing gait, limited research has evaluated the concurrent validity of these devices on less predictable walking surfaces or the comparability of different methods used for gravitational acceleration compensation. This study evaluated the concurrent validity of trunk accelerations derived from a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces and contrasted two methods used to remove gravitational accelerations; i) subtraction of the best linear fit from the data (detrending); and ii) use of orientation information (quaternions) from the inertial measurement unit. Twelve older and twelve younger adults walked at their preferred speed along firm, compliant and uneven walkways. Accelerations were evaluated for the thoracic spine (T12) using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit and an eleven-camera Vicon system. The findings demonstrated excellent agreement between accelerations derived from the inertial measurement unit and motion analysis system, including while walking on uneven surfaces that better approximate a real-world setting (all differences <0.16 m.s(-2)). Detrending produced slightly better agreement between the inertial measurement unit and Vicon system on firm surfaces (delta range: -0.05 to 0.06 vs. 0.00 to 0.14 m.s(-2)), whereas the quaternion method performed better when walking on compliant and uneven walkways (delta range: -0.16 to -0.02 vs. -0.07 to 0.07 m.s(-2)). The technique used to compensate for gravitational accelerations requires consideration in future research, particularly when walking on compliant and uneven surfaces. These findings demonstrate trunk accelerations can be accurately measured using a wireless inertial measurement unit and are appropriate for research that evaluates healthy populations in complex environments.Michael H ColeWolbert van den HoornJustin K KavanaghSteven MorrisonPaul W HodgesJames E SmeathersGraham K KerrPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 5, p e98395 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Michael H Cole
Wolbert van den Hoorn
Justin K Kavanagh
Steven Morrison
Paul W Hodges
James E Smeathers
Graham K Kerr
Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
description Although accelerometers are extensively used for assessing gait, limited research has evaluated the concurrent validity of these devices on less predictable walking surfaces or the comparability of different methods used for gravitational acceleration compensation. This study evaluated the concurrent validity of trunk accelerations derived from a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces and contrasted two methods used to remove gravitational accelerations; i) subtraction of the best linear fit from the data (detrending); and ii) use of orientation information (quaternions) from the inertial measurement unit. Twelve older and twelve younger adults walked at their preferred speed along firm, compliant and uneven walkways. Accelerations were evaluated for the thoracic spine (T12) using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit and an eleven-camera Vicon system. The findings demonstrated excellent agreement between accelerations derived from the inertial measurement unit and motion analysis system, including while walking on uneven surfaces that better approximate a real-world setting (all differences <0.16 m.s(-2)). Detrending produced slightly better agreement between the inertial measurement unit and Vicon system on firm surfaces (delta range: -0.05 to 0.06 vs. 0.00 to 0.14 m.s(-2)), whereas the quaternion method performed better when walking on compliant and uneven walkways (delta range: -0.16 to -0.02 vs. -0.07 to 0.07 m.s(-2)). The technique used to compensate for gravitational accelerations requires consideration in future research, particularly when walking on compliant and uneven surfaces. These findings demonstrate trunk accelerations can be accurately measured using a wireless inertial measurement unit and are appropriate for research that evaluates healthy populations in complex environments.
format article
author Michael H Cole
Wolbert van den Hoorn
Justin K Kavanagh
Steven Morrison
Paul W Hodges
James E Smeathers
Graham K Kerr
author_facet Michael H Cole
Wolbert van den Hoorn
Justin K Kavanagh
Steven Morrison
Paul W Hodges
James E Smeathers
Graham K Kerr
author_sort Michael H Cole
title Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
title_short Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
title_full Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
title_fullStr Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
title_sort concurrent validity of accelerations measured using a tri-axial inertial measurement unit while walking on firm, compliant and uneven surfaces.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/dfb013b818b4419c8dfe2dea655c5929
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelhcole concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT wolbertvandenhoorn concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT justinkkavanagh concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT stevenmorrison concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT paulwhodges concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT jamesesmeathers concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
AT grahamkkerr concurrentvalidityofaccelerationsmeasuredusingatriaxialinertialmeasurementunitwhilewalkingonfirmcompliantandunevensurfaces
_version_ 1718421955404627968