Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses

Nowadays, desalination continues to expand globally, which is one of the most effective solutions to solve the problem of the global drinking water shortage. However, desalination is not a fail-safe process and has many environmental and human health consequences. This paper investigated the desalin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huyen Trang Do Thi, Tibor Pasztor, Daniel Fozer, Flavio Manenti, Andras Jozsef Toth
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dfdf4b0ebc3a464b9e7573b3d1657f28
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dfdf4b0ebc3a464b9e7573b3d1657f28
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dfdf4b0ebc3a464b9e7573b3d1657f282021-11-11T19:54:53ZComparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses10.3390/w132130232073-4441https://doaj.org/article/dfdf4b0ebc3a464b9e7573b3d1657f282021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/21/3023https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441Nowadays, desalination continues to expand globally, which is one of the most effective solutions to solve the problem of the global drinking water shortage. However, desalination is not a fail-safe process and has many environmental and human health consequences. This paper investigated the desalination procedure of seawater with different technologies, namely, multi-stage flash distillation (MSF), multi-effect distillation (MED), and reverse osmosis (RO), and with various energy sources (fossil energy, solar energy, wind energy, nuclear energy). The aim was to examine the different desalination technologies’ effectiveness with energy sources using three assessment methods, which were examined separately. The life cycle assessment (LCA), PESTLE, and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods were used to evaluate each procedure. LCA was based on the following impact analysis and evaluation methods: ReCiPe 2016, IMPACT 2002+, and IPCC 2013 GWP 100a; PESTLE risk analysis evaluated the long-lasting impact on processes and technologies with political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors. Additionally, MCDA was based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to evaluate desalination technologies. This study considered the operational phase of a plant, which includes the necessary energy and chemical needs, which is called “gate-to-gate” analysis. Saudi Arabia data were used for the analysis, with the base unit of 1 m<sup>3</sup> of the water product. As the result of this study, RO combined with renewable energy provided outstanding benefits in terms of human health, ecosystem quality, and resources, as well as the climate change and emissions of GHGs categories.Huyen Trang Do ThiTibor PasztorDaniel FozerFlavio ManentiAndras Jozsef TothMDPI AGarticlelife cycle assessmentPESTLE analysismulti-criteria decision analysesdesalinationreverse osmosismulti-stage flash distillationHydraulic engineeringTC1-978Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENWater, Vol 13, Iss 3023, p 3023 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic life cycle assessment
PESTLE analysis
multi-criteria decision analyses
desalination
reverse osmosis
multi-stage flash distillation
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle life cycle assessment
PESTLE analysis
multi-criteria decision analyses
desalination
reverse osmosis
multi-stage flash distillation
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Huyen Trang Do Thi
Tibor Pasztor
Daniel Fozer
Flavio Manenti
Andras Jozsef Toth
Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
description Nowadays, desalination continues to expand globally, which is one of the most effective solutions to solve the problem of the global drinking water shortage. However, desalination is not a fail-safe process and has many environmental and human health consequences. This paper investigated the desalination procedure of seawater with different technologies, namely, multi-stage flash distillation (MSF), multi-effect distillation (MED), and reverse osmosis (RO), and with various energy sources (fossil energy, solar energy, wind energy, nuclear energy). The aim was to examine the different desalination technologies’ effectiveness with energy sources using three assessment methods, which were examined separately. The life cycle assessment (LCA), PESTLE, and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods were used to evaluate each procedure. LCA was based on the following impact analysis and evaluation methods: ReCiPe 2016, IMPACT 2002+, and IPCC 2013 GWP 100a; PESTLE risk analysis evaluated the long-lasting impact on processes and technologies with political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors. Additionally, MCDA was based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to evaluate desalination technologies. This study considered the operational phase of a plant, which includes the necessary energy and chemical needs, which is called “gate-to-gate” analysis. Saudi Arabia data were used for the analysis, with the base unit of 1 m<sup>3</sup> of the water product. As the result of this study, RO combined with renewable energy provided outstanding benefits in terms of human health, ecosystem quality, and resources, as well as the climate change and emissions of GHGs categories.
format article
author Huyen Trang Do Thi
Tibor Pasztor
Daniel Fozer
Flavio Manenti
Andras Jozsef Toth
author_facet Huyen Trang Do Thi
Tibor Pasztor
Daniel Fozer
Flavio Manenti
Andras Jozsef Toth
author_sort Huyen Trang Do Thi
title Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
title_short Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
title_full Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
title_fullStr Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
title_sort comparison of desalination technologies using renewable energy sources with life cycle, pestle, and multi-criteria decision analyses
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/dfdf4b0ebc3a464b9e7573b3d1657f28
work_keys_str_mv AT huyentrangdothi comparisonofdesalinationtechnologiesusingrenewableenergysourceswithlifecyclepestleandmulticriteriadecisionanalyses
AT tiborpasztor comparisonofdesalinationtechnologiesusingrenewableenergysourceswithlifecyclepestleandmulticriteriadecisionanalyses
AT danielfozer comparisonofdesalinationtechnologiesusingrenewableenergysourceswithlifecyclepestleandmulticriteriadecisionanalyses
AT flaviomanenti comparisonofdesalinationtechnologiesusingrenewableenergysourceswithlifecyclepestleandmulticriteriadecisionanalyses
AT andrasjozseftoth comparisonofdesalinationtechnologiesusingrenewableenergysourceswithlifecyclepestleandmulticriteriadecisionanalyses
_version_ 1718431379578945536