Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka

Equivalence of Written Translation in the Context of the Assessment of the Credibility of Witness Testimony This article presents a study on the equivalence of written translation in the context of the assessment of the credibility of witness testimony. Part one examines psychological criteria for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska, Magdalena Brol, Agnieszka Głowacka, Justyna Kudyk, Marta Pasiut
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2019
Materias:	equivalence credibility assessment eyewitness testimony translation comparative analysis Translating and interpreting P306-310
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e0624e00c41b4f839b434c8bbd4e5b65
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e0624e00c41b4f839b434c8bbd4e5b65
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e0624e00c41b4f839b434c8bbd4e5b652021-11-27T13:05:08ZEkwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka10.12797/MOaP.25.2019.43.071689-91212391-6745https://doaj.org/article/e0624e00c41b4f839b434c8bbd4e5b652019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/moap/article/view/568https://doaj.org/toc/1689-9121https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6745 Equivalence of Written Translation in the Context of the Assessment of the Credibility of Witness Testimony This article presents a study on the equivalence of written translation in the context of the assessment of the credibility of witness testimony. Part one examines psychological criteria for assessing the credibility of testimony and linguistic indicators of deception that formed the theoretical basis of the study. Translations gathered during the study were analyzed linguistically and compared with original in order to categorize the errors and mistakes made by translators before and after learning the criteria of statements credibility assessment in training. The article also presents a comparative analysis of the assessments made by expert judges with regard to both the original testimonies and the translations thereof. The results of the statistical analysis showed that there are certain differences in the assessment of an original and its translation, and knowledge of the criteria for determining the credibility of a witness’s testimony has a positive impact on translation equivalence. Katarzyna Liber-KwiecińskaMagdalena BrolAgnieszka GłowackaJustyna KudykMarta PasiutKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticleequivalencecredibility assessmenteyewitness testimonytranslationcomparative analysisTranslating and interpretingP306-310ENFRPLMiędzy Oryginałem a Przekładem, Vol 25, Iss 1 (43) (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR PL
topic	equivalence credibility assessment eyewitness testimony translation comparative analysis Translating and interpreting P306-310
spellingShingle	equivalence credibility assessment eyewitness testimony translation comparative analysis Translating and interpreting P306-310 Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska Magdalena Brol Agnieszka Głowacka Justyna Kudyk Marta Pasiut Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
description	Equivalence of Written Translation in the Context of the Assessment of the Credibility of Witness Testimony This article presents a study on the equivalence of written translation in the context of the assessment of the credibility of witness testimony. Part one examines psychological criteria for assessing the credibility of testimony and linguistic indicators of deception that formed the theoretical basis of the study. Translations gathered during the study were analyzed linguistically and compared with original in order to categorize the errors and mistakes made by translators before and after learning the criteria of statements credibility assessment in training. The article also presents a comparative analysis of the assessments made by expert judges with regard to both the original testimonies and the translations thereof. The results of the statistical analysis showed that there are certain differences in the assessment of an original and its translation, and knowledge of the criteria for determining the credibility of a witness’s testimony has a positive impact on translation equivalence.
format	article
author	Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska Magdalena Brol Agnieszka Głowacka Justyna Kudyk Marta Pasiut
author_facet	Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska Magdalena Brol Agnieszka Głowacka Justyna Kudyk Marta Pasiut
author_sort	Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska
title	Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
title_short	Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
title_full	Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
title_fullStr	Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
title_full_unstemmed	Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
title_sort	ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/e0624e00c41b4f839b434c8bbd4e5b65
work_keys_str_mv	AT katarzynaliberkwiecinska ekwiwalencjaprzekładuwkontekscieocenywiarygodnoscizeznanswiadka AT magdalenabrol ekwiwalencjaprzekładuwkontekscieocenywiarygodnoscizeznanswiadka AT agnieszkagłowacka ekwiwalencjaprzekładuwkontekscieocenywiarygodnoscizeznanswiadka AT justynakudyk ekwiwalencjaprzekładuwkontekscieocenywiarygodnoscizeznanswiadka AT martapasiut ekwiwalencjaprzekładuwkontekscieocenywiarygodnoscizeznanswiadka
_version_	1718408774262194176

Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka

Ejemplares similares