Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA) are associated with recurrent skin abscesses. Secondary prevention, in conjunction with primary treatment of the infection, focuses...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marc-Nicolas Rentinck, Renate Krüger, Pia-Alice Hoppe, Daniel Humme, Michaela Niebank, Anna Pokrywka, Miriam Stegemann, Axel Kola, Leif Gunnar Hanitsch, Rasmus Leistner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e0904ebdbce84c088c08b893f93013eb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e0904ebdbce84c088c08b893f93013eb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e0904ebdbce84c088c08b893f93013eb2021-12-02T20:09:59ZSkin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253633https://doaj.org/article/e0904ebdbce84c088c08b893f93013eb2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253633https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4>Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA) are associated with recurrent skin abscesses. Secondary prevention, in conjunction with primary treatment of the infection, focuses on topical decolonization. Topical decolonization is a standard procedure in cases of recurrent PVL-SA skin infections and is recommended in international guidelines. However, this outpatient treatment is often not fully reimbursed by health insurance providers, which may interfere with successful PVL-SA decolonization.<h4>Aim</h4>Our goal was to estimate the cost effectiveness of outpatient decolonization of patients with recurrent PVL-SA skin infections. We calculated the average cost of treatment for PVL-SA per outpatient decolonization procedure as well as per in-hospital stay.<h4>Methods</h4>The study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at a German tertiary care university hospital. The cohort analyzed was obtained from the hospital's microbiology laboratory database. Data on medical costs, DRG-based diagnoses, and ICD-10 patient data was obtained from the hospital's financial controlling department. We calculated the average cost of treatment for patients admitted for treatment of PVL-SA induced skin infections. The cost of outpatient treatment is based on the German regulations of drug prices for prescription drugs.<h4>Results</h4>We analyzed a total of n = 466 swabs from n = 411 patients with recurrent skin infections suspected of carrying PVL-SA. PVL-SA was detected in 61.3% of all patients included in the study. Of those isolates, 80.6% were methicillin-susceptible, 19.4% methicillin-resistant. 89.8% of all patients were treated as outpatients. In 73.0% of inpatients colonized with PVL-SA the main diagnosis was SSTI. The median length of stay was 5.5 days for inpatients colonized with PVL-SA whose main diagnosis SSTI; the average cost was €2,283. The estimated costs per decolonization procedure in outpatients ranged from €50-€110, depending on the products used.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our data shows that outpatient decolonization offers a highly cost-effective secondary prevention strategy, which may prevent costly inpatient treatments. Therefore, health insurance companies should consider providing coverage of outpatient treatment of recurrent PVL-SA skin and soft tissue infections.Marc-Nicolas RentinckRenate KrügerPia-Alice HoppeDaniel HummeMichaela NiebankAnna PokrywkaMiriam StegemannAxel KolaLeif Gunnar HanitschRasmus LeistnerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0253633 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marc-Nicolas Rentinck
Renate Krüger
Pia-Alice Hoppe
Daniel Humme
Michaela Niebank
Anna Pokrywka
Miriam Stegemann
Axel Kola
Leif Gunnar Hanitsch
Rasmus Leistner
Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA) are associated with recurrent skin abscesses. Secondary prevention, in conjunction with primary treatment of the infection, focuses on topical decolonization. Topical decolonization is a standard procedure in cases of recurrent PVL-SA skin infections and is recommended in international guidelines. However, this outpatient treatment is often not fully reimbursed by health insurance providers, which may interfere with successful PVL-SA decolonization.<h4>Aim</h4>Our goal was to estimate the cost effectiveness of outpatient decolonization of patients with recurrent PVL-SA skin infections. We calculated the average cost of treatment for PVL-SA per outpatient decolonization procedure as well as per in-hospital stay.<h4>Methods</h4>The study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at a German tertiary care university hospital. The cohort analyzed was obtained from the hospital's microbiology laboratory database. Data on medical costs, DRG-based diagnoses, and ICD-10 patient data was obtained from the hospital's financial controlling department. We calculated the average cost of treatment for patients admitted for treatment of PVL-SA induced skin infections. The cost of outpatient treatment is based on the German regulations of drug prices for prescription drugs.<h4>Results</h4>We analyzed a total of n = 466 swabs from n = 411 patients with recurrent skin infections suspected of carrying PVL-SA. PVL-SA was detected in 61.3% of all patients included in the study. Of those isolates, 80.6% were methicillin-susceptible, 19.4% methicillin-resistant. 89.8% of all patients were treated as outpatients. In 73.0% of inpatients colonized with PVL-SA the main diagnosis was SSTI. The median length of stay was 5.5 days for inpatients colonized with PVL-SA whose main diagnosis SSTI; the average cost was €2,283. The estimated costs per decolonization procedure in outpatients ranged from €50-€110, depending on the products used.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our data shows that outpatient decolonization offers a highly cost-effective secondary prevention strategy, which may prevent costly inpatient treatments. Therefore, health insurance companies should consider providing coverage of outpatient treatment of recurrent PVL-SA skin and soft tissue infections.
format article
author Marc-Nicolas Rentinck
Renate Krüger
Pia-Alice Hoppe
Daniel Humme
Michaela Niebank
Anna Pokrywka
Miriam Stegemann
Axel Kola
Leif Gunnar Hanitsch
Rasmus Leistner
author_facet Marc-Nicolas Rentinck
Renate Krüger
Pia-Alice Hoppe
Daniel Humme
Michaela Niebank
Anna Pokrywka
Miriam Stegemann
Axel Kola
Leif Gunnar Hanitsch
Rasmus Leistner
author_sort Marc-Nicolas Rentinck
title Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
title_short Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
title_full Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
title_fullStr Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
title_full_unstemmed Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
title_sort skin infections due to panton-valentine leukocidin (pvl)-producing s. aureus-cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e0904ebdbce84c088c08b893f93013eb
work_keys_str_mv AT marcnicolasrentinck skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT renatekruger skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT piaalicehoppe skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT danielhumme skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT michaelaniebank skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT annapokrywka skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT miriamstegemann skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT axelkola skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT leifgunnarhanitsch skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
AT rasmusleistner skininfectionsduetopantonvalentineleukocidinpvlproducingsaureuscosteffectivenessofoutpatienttreatment
_version_ 1718375094488662016