Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses

Abstract The ability of humans to discriminate enantiomeric odour pairs is substance –specific. Current literature suggests that psychophysical discrimination of odour enantiomers mainly depends on the peripheral processing at the level of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSN). To study the influence...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sophia C. Poletti, Annachiara Cavazzana, Cagdas Guducu, Maria Larsson, Thomas Hummel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e0a8b7422b7d465e97f8d4473857a1f2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e0a8b7422b7d465e97f8d4473857a1f2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e0a8b7422b7d465e97f8d4473857a1f22021-12-02T16:06:50ZIndistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses10.1038/s41598-017-09594-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/e0a8b7422b7d465e97f8d4473857a1f22017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09594-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The ability of humans to discriminate enantiomeric odour pairs is substance –specific. Current literature suggests that psychophysical discrimination of odour enantiomers mainly depends on the peripheral processing at the level of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSN). To study the influence of central processing in discrimination, we investigated differences in the electrophysiological responses to psychophysically indistinguishable (+)- and (−)- rose oxide enantiomers at peripheral and central-nervous levels in humans. We recorded the electro-olfactogram (EOG) from the olfactory epithelium and the EEG-derived olfactory event-related potentials (OERP). Results from a psychophysical three alternative forced choice test indicated indistinguishability of the two odour enantiomers. In a total of 19 young participants EOG could be recorded in 74 and OERP in 95% of subjects. Significantly different EOG amplitudes and latencies were recorded in response to the 2 stimuli. However, no such differences in amplitude or latency emerged for the OERP. In conclusion, although the pair of enantiomer could be discriminated at a peripheral level this did not lead to a central-nervous/cognitive differentiation of the two stimuli.Sophia C. PolettiAnnachiara CavazzanaCagdas GuducuMaria LarssonThomas HummelNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sophia C. Poletti
Annachiara Cavazzana
Cagdas Guducu
Maria Larsson
Thomas Hummel
Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
description Abstract The ability of humans to discriminate enantiomeric odour pairs is substance –specific. Current literature suggests that psychophysical discrimination of odour enantiomers mainly depends on the peripheral processing at the level of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSN). To study the influence of central processing in discrimination, we investigated differences in the electrophysiological responses to psychophysically indistinguishable (+)- and (−)- rose oxide enantiomers at peripheral and central-nervous levels in humans. We recorded the electro-olfactogram (EOG) from the olfactory epithelium and the EEG-derived olfactory event-related potentials (OERP). Results from a psychophysical three alternative forced choice test indicated indistinguishability of the two odour enantiomers. In a total of 19 young participants EOG could be recorded in 74 and OERP in 95% of subjects. Significantly different EOG amplitudes and latencies were recorded in response to the 2 stimuli. However, no such differences in amplitude or latency emerged for the OERP. In conclusion, although the pair of enantiomer could be discriminated at a peripheral level this did not lead to a central-nervous/cognitive differentiation of the two stimuli.
format article
author Sophia C. Poletti
Annachiara Cavazzana
Cagdas Guducu
Maria Larsson
Thomas Hummel
author_facet Sophia C. Poletti
Annachiara Cavazzana
Cagdas Guducu
Maria Larsson
Thomas Hummel
author_sort Sophia C. Poletti
title Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
title_short Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
title_full Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
title_fullStr Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
title_full_unstemmed Indistinguishable odour enantiomers: Differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
title_sort indistinguishable odour enantiomers: differences between peripheral and central-nervous electrophysiological responses
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/e0a8b7422b7d465e97f8d4473857a1f2
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiacpoletti indistinguishableodourenantiomersdifferencesbetweenperipheralandcentralnervouselectrophysiologicalresponses
AT annachiaracavazzana indistinguishableodourenantiomersdifferencesbetweenperipheralandcentralnervouselectrophysiologicalresponses
AT cagdasguducu indistinguishableodourenantiomersdifferencesbetweenperipheralandcentralnervouselectrophysiologicalresponses
AT marialarsson indistinguishableodourenantiomersdifferencesbetweenperipheralandcentralnervouselectrophysiologicalresponses
AT thomashummel indistinguishableodourenantiomersdifferencesbetweenperipheralandcentralnervouselectrophysiologicalresponses
_version_ 1718384873974005760