Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.

<h4>Background</h4>Healthcare systems monitor and improve mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction through use of population-based and efficiency-based staffing models, the former focused on staffing ratios and the latter, staff productivity. Preliminary evide...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matt Boden, Clifford A Smith, Jodie A Trafton
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e116e54bbdb04df0926f4b9ff49ab8dd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e116e54bbdb04df0926f4b9ff49ab8dd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e116e54bbdb04df0926f4b9ff49ab8dd2021-12-02T20:18:04ZInvestigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256268https://doaj.org/article/e116e54bbdb04df0926f4b9ff49ab8dd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256268https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Healthcare systems monitor and improve mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction through use of population-based and efficiency-based staffing models, the former focused on staffing ratios and the latter, staff productivity. Preliminary evidence suggests that both high staffing ratios and moderate-to-high staff productivity are important for ensuring a full continuum of mental health services to indicated populations.<h4>Methods & findings</h4>With an information-theoretic approach, we conducted a longitudinal investigation of mental health staffing, productivity and treatment at the largest integrated healthcare system in American, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). VHA facilities (N = 140) served as the unit of measure, with mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction predicted by facility staffing and productivity in longitudinal mixed models. An information-theoretic approach: (a) entails the development of a comprehensive set of plausible models that are fit, ranked and weighted to quantitatively assess the relative support for each, and (b) accounts for model uncertainty while identifying best-fit model(s) that include important and exclude unimportant explanatory variables. In best-fit models, higher staffing was the strongest and most consistent predictor of better treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Higher staff productivity was often, but not always associated with better treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Results were further nuanced by differential prediction of treatment by between- and within-facility predictor effects and variable interactions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A population-based mental health staffing ratio and an efficiency-based productivity value are important longitudinal predictors of mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Our longitudinal design and use of mixed regression models and an information-theoretic approach addresses multiple limitations of prior studies and strengthen our results. Results are discussed in terms of the provision of mental health treatment by healthcare systems, and analytical modeling of treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction.Matt BodenClifford A SmithJodie A TraftonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0256268 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Matt Boden
Clifford A Smith
Jodie A Trafton
Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
description <h4>Background</h4>Healthcare systems monitor and improve mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction through use of population-based and efficiency-based staffing models, the former focused on staffing ratios and the latter, staff productivity. Preliminary evidence suggests that both high staffing ratios and moderate-to-high staff productivity are important for ensuring a full continuum of mental health services to indicated populations.<h4>Methods & findings</h4>With an information-theoretic approach, we conducted a longitudinal investigation of mental health staffing, productivity and treatment at the largest integrated healthcare system in American, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). VHA facilities (N = 140) served as the unit of measure, with mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction predicted by facility staffing and productivity in longitudinal mixed models. An information-theoretic approach: (a) entails the development of a comprehensive set of plausible models that are fit, ranked and weighted to quantitatively assess the relative support for each, and (b) accounts for model uncertainty while identifying best-fit model(s) that include important and exclude unimportant explanatory variables. In best-fit models, higher staffing was the strongest and most consistent predictor of better treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Higher staff productivity was often, but not always associated with better treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Results were further nuanced by differential prediction of treatment by between- and within-facility predictor effects and variable interactions.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A population-based mental health staffing ratio and an efficiency-based productivity value are important longitudinal predictors of mental health treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction. Our longitudinal design and use of mixed regression models and an information-theoretic approach addresses multiple limitations of prior studies and strengthen our results. Results are discussed in terms of the provision of mental health treatment by healthcare systems, and analytical modeling of treatment quality, access, continuity and satisfaction.
format article
author Matt Boden
Clifford A Smith
Jodie A Trafton
author_facet Matt Boden
Clifford A Smith
Jodie A Trafton
author_sort Matt Boden
title Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
title_short Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
title_full Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
title_fullStr Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
title_sort investigation of population-based mental health staffing and efficiency-based mental health productivity using an information-theoretic approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e116e54bbdb04df0926f4b9ff49ab8dd
work_keys_str_mv AT mattboden investigationofpopulationbasedmentalhealthstaffingandefficiencybasedmentalhealthproductivityusinganinformationtheoreticapproach
AT cliffordasmith investigationofpopulationbasedmentalhealthstaffingandefficiencybasedmentalhealthproductivityusinganinformationtheoreticapproach
AT jodieatrafton investigationofpopulationbasedmentalhealthstaffingandefficiencybasedmentalhealthproductivityusinganinformationtheoreticapproach
_version_ 1718374317844070400