Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.

<h4>Background</h4>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are commonly used diagnostic modalities in biliary strictures. We compared the diagnostic yield of EUS and ERCP-based tissue sampling in intrinsic biliary strictures without extrinsic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hye Gyo Chung, Jong-In Chang, Kwang Hyuk Lee, Joo Kyung Park, Kyu Taek Lee, Jong Kyun Lee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e1191b1742e84761bb38d07e2515d316
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e1191b1742e84761bb38d07e2515d316
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e1191b1742e84761bb38d07e2515d3162021-12-02T20:16:43ZComparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0258887https://doaj.org/article/e1191b1742e84761bb38d07e2515d3162021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258887https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are commonly used diagnostic modalities in biliary strictures. We compared the diagnostic yield of EUS and ERCP-based tissue sampling in intrinsic biliary strictures without extrinsic mass outside the bile duct.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 85 patients who underwent ERCP and EUS for diagnosis of suspected biliary strictures confined to the bile duct were analyzed retrospectively at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between 2010 and 2018.<h4>Results</h4>Seventy-one patients were diagnosed with malignancy and 14 patients were diagnosed with benign strictures. EUS-based tissue sampling was more sensitive and accurate than ERCP-based tissue sampling (p = 0.038). The overall sensitivity and accuracy were 67.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.1-77.3) and 72.9% (95% CI 62.7-81.2) for ERCP-based sampling, and 80.3% (95% CI 69.6-87.9) and 83.5% (95% CI 74.2-89.9) for EUS-based sampling, respectively. EUS-based sampling was superior to ERCP-based sampling in distal bile duct strictures (accuracy: 87.0% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.007), but not in perihilar strictures. In cases without intraductal mass, EUS-based tissue sampling was also superior to ERCP-based sampling (accuracy: 83.3% vs. 69.7%, p = 0.029), but not in cases with mass.<h4>Conclusion</h4>EUS-based tissue sampling was superior to ERCP-based method in intrinsic biliary stricture with no mass outside the bile duct, particularly in those without intraductal mass or those with strictures located in distal bile duct. Therefore, EUS-based sampling should be considered for making a pathological diagnosis of suspected distal bile duct strictures even in lesions without definite mass.Hye Gyo ChungJong-In ChangKwang Hyuk LeeJoo Kyung ParkKyu Taek LeeJong Kyun LeePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0258887 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hye Gyo Chung
Jong-In Chang
Kwang Hyuk Lee
Joo Kyung Park
Kyu Taek Lee
Jong Kyun Lee
Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
description <h4>Background</h4>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are commonly used diagnostic modalities in biliary strictures. We compared the diagnostic yield of EUS and ERCP-based tissue sampling in intrinsic biliary strictures without extrinsic mass outside the bile duct.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 85 patients who underwent ERCP and EUS for diagnosis of suspected biliary strictures confined to the bile duct were analyzed retrospectively at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between 2010 and 2018.<h4>Results</h4>Seventy-one patients were diagnosed with malignancy and 14 patients were diagnosed with benign strictures. EUS-based tissue sampling was more sensitive and accurate than ERCP-based tissue sampling (p = 0.038). The overall sensitivity and accuracy were 67.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.1-77.3) and 72.9% (95% CI 62.7-81.2) for ERCP-based sampling, and 80.3% (95% CI 69.6-87.9) and 83.5% (95% CI 74.2-89.9) for EUS-based sampling, respectively. EUS-based sampling was superior to ERCP-based sampling in distal bile duct strictures (accuracy: 87.0% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.007), but not in perihilar strictures. In cases without intraductal mass, EUS-based tissue sampling was also superior to ERCP-based sampling (accuracy: 83.3% vs. 69.7%, p = 0.029), but not in cases with mass.<h4>Conclusion</h4>EUS-based tissue sampling was superior to ERCP-based method in intrinsic biliary stricture with no mass outside the bile duct, particularly in those without intraductal mass or those with strictures located in distal bile duct. Therefore, EUS-based sampling should be considered for making a pathological diagnosis of suspected distal bile duct strictures even in lesions without definite mass.
format article
author Hye Gyo Chung
Jong-In Chang
Kwang Hyuk Lee
Joo Kyung Park
Kyu Taek Lee
Jong Kyun Lee
author_facet Hye Gyo Chung
Jong-In Chang
Kwang Hyuk Lee
Joo Kyung Park
Kyu Taek Lee
Jong Kyun Lee
author_sort Hye Gyo Chung
title Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
title_short Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
title_full Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
title_fullStr Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of EUS and ERCP-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
title_sort comparison of eus and ercp-guided tissue sampling in suspected biliary stricture.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e1191b1742e84761bb38d07e2515d316
work_keys_str_mv AT hyegyochung comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
AT jonginchang comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
AT kwanghyuklee comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
AT jookyungpark comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
AT kyutaeklee comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
AT jongkyunlee comparisonofeusandercpguidedtissuesamplinginsuspectedbiliarystricture
_version_ 1718374496824459264