TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO

This article is set out to examine the homogenizing nature of two factors: nation-building and globalization and social movements emerged within the regions of two countries, Turkey and Mexico. On the one hand, homogenizing mechanism in Turkey is depicted as the general framework of nation-building,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Alper ÇAKMAK
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	kurdish movement the zapatista regionalism democratization civil society identity Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e130ce3d32124106a57e23d25da44bc8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e130ce3d32124106a57e23d25da44bc8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e130ce3d32124106a57e23d25da44bc82021-11-24T09:20:58ZTWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO2148-416310.9761/JASSS2506https://doaj.org/article/e130ce3d32124106a57e23d25da44bc82019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=1275778088_23-Ar%C5%9F.%20G%C3%B6r.%20Alper%20%C3%87AKMAK.pdf&key=27204https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163This article is set out to examine the homogenizing nature of two factors: nation-building and globalization and social movements emerged within the regions of two countries, Turkey and Mexico. On the one hand, homogenizing mechanism in Turkey is depicted as the general framework of nation-building, on the other side, the intertwined relationship between patterns of liberal institutionalism, globalization and regionalism is depicted as the mechanisms of harassment of original identities and so-long protected lands. In order to grasp the intertwined relationship between globalization and regionalism, the latter as a mechanism of getting in harmony with the former, a general overview of the literature is presented. One needs to grasp the general framework that forced such a social movement like Zapatista to rebel against the systemic structure and that’s why the paper puts more emphasis on the review of what the scholars with different perspectives think about the globalization and regionalism. As much as the subject concerned, a brief overview of the backgrounds for both the Zapatista and Kurdish movements is given in order to reflect the notion of hegemony prevailing in the milieus that these two social movements emerged. The article lastly focuses on the fact that both Kurdish movement in Turkey and Zapatista Movement in Mexico paved the way for other subaltern identities to speak louder than before. A comparative reading of these two Marxist movements is studied here in order to appreciate de facto contributions made to the democratization of the countries concerned.Alper ÇAKMAKFırat Universityarticlekurdish movementthe zapatistaregionalismdemocratizationcivil societyidentitySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 7, Iss 29, Pp 387-401 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	kurdish movement the zapatista regionalism democratization civil society identity Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	kurdish movement the zapatista regionalism democratization civil society identity Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Alper ÇAKMAK TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
description	This article is set out to examine the homogenizing nature of two factors: nation-building and globalization and social movements emerged within the regions of two countries, Turkey and Mexico. On the one hand, homogenizing mechanism in Turkey is depicted as the general framework of nation-building, on the other side, the intertwined relationship between patterns of liberal institutionalism, globalization and regionalism is depicted as the mechanisms of harassment of original identities and so-long protected lands. In order to grasp the intertwined relationship between globalization and regionalism, the latter as a mechanism of getting in harmony with the former, a general overview of the literature is presented. One needs to grasp the general framework that forced such a social movement like Zapatista to rebel against the systemic structure and that’s why the paper puts more emphasis on the review of what the scholars with different perspectives think about the globalization and regionalism. As much as the subject concerned, a brief overview of the backgrounds for both the Zapatista and Kurdish movements is given in order to reflect the notion of hegemony prevailing in the milieus that these two social movements emerged. The article lastly focuses on the fact that both Kurdish movement in Turkey and Zapatista Movement in Mexico paved the way for other subaltern identities to speak louder than before. A comparative reading of these two Marxist movements is studied here in order to appreciate de facto contributions made to the democratization of the countries concerned.
format	article
author	Alper ÇAKMAK
author_facet	Alper ÇAKMAK
author_sort	Alper ÇAKMAK
title	TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
title_short	TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
title_full	TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
title_fullStr	TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
title_full_unstemmed	TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO
title_sort	two different movements as a response to two different homogenizing mechanisms: a comparative reading of the kurdish movement in turkey and zapatista movement in chiapas, mexico
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/e130ce3d32124106a57e23d25da44bc8
work_keys_str_mv	AT alpercakmak twodifferentmovementsasaresponsetotwodifferenthomogenizingmechanismsacomparativereadingofthekurdishmovementinturkeyandzapatistamovementinchiapasmexico
_version_	1718415389499588608

TWO DIFFERENT MOVEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO TWO DIFFERENT HOMOGENIZING MECHANISMS: A COMPARATIVE READING OF THE KURDISH MOVEMENT IN TURKEY AND ZAPATISTA MOVEMENT IN CHIAPAS, MEXICO

Ejemplares similares