Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
Abstract Induction of labour (IOL) is increasingly used in obstetric practice. For patients with unfavourable cervix, we are constantly looking for an optimal, in terms of effectiveness and safety, ripening of cervix protocol. It was retrospective cohort study. We analyzed obstetrical results in 481...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Jakub Mlodawski, Marta Mlodawska, Justyna Armanska, Grzegorz Swiercz, Stanisław Gluszek |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e16539abedff4a83ac1d096bafa3c3d1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Induction of Labor with Vaginal Dinoprostone (PGE<sub>2</sub>) in Patients with a Previous Cesarean Section: Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Nuria López-Jiménez, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Effect of Sublingual Misoprostol Prior to Insertion of Intrauterine Device in Women with no Previous Vaginal Delivery
por: Zeinab Elgharbawy, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
COMPARISON OF ORAL (20 µG 2 HOURLY) VERSUS VAGINAL (25 µG 6 HOURLY) MISOPROSTOL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR IN TERM PREGNANCIES
por: Tahmina Yousaf, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Prophylactic Administration of Per Rectal Misoprostol vs Intramuscular Injection of Oxytocin in Third-stage of Labour for Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Sougata Kumar Burman, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Carbetocin versus Rectal Misoprostol to Decrease Blood Loss in Vaginal Delivery in High Risk Patients for Postpartum Hemorrhage
por: Yasmin Abd-Elmoaty Abdo Mohamed Hetiba, et al.
Publicado: (2021)